Entity

Time filter

Source Type

Oldenburg, Germany

Bauer J.,Geriatric Center Oldenburg | Biolo G.,University of Trieste | Cederholm T.,Uppsala University | Cesari M.,French Institute of Health and Medical Research | And 9 more authors.
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association | Year: 2013

New evidence shows that older adults need more dietary protein than do younger adults to support good health, promote recovery from illness, and maintain functionality. Older people need to make up for age-related changes in protein metabolism, such as high splanchnic extraction and declining anabolic responses to ingested protein. They also need more protein to offset inflammatory and catabolic conditions associated with chronic and acute diseases that occur commonly with aging. With the goal ofdeveloping updated, evidence-based recommendations for optimal protein intake by older people, theEuropean Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), in cooperation with other scientific organizations, appointed an international study group to review dietary protein needs with aging (PROT-AGE Study Group). To helpolder people (>65 years) maintain and regain lean body mass and function, the PROT-AGE study group recommends average daily intake at least in the range of 1.0 to 1.2 g protein per kilogram of body weight per day. Both endurance- and resistance-type exercises are recommended at individualized levels that are safe and tolerated, and higher protein intake (ie, ≥;1.2 g/kg body weight/d) is advised for those who are exercising and otherwise active. Most older adults who have acute or chronic diseases need even more dietary protein (ie, 1.2-1.5 g/kg body weight/d). Older people with severe kidney disease (ie, estimated GFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2), but who are not on dialysis, are an exception to this rule; these individuals may need to limit proteinintake. Protein quality, timing of ingestion, and intake of other nutritional supplements may be relevant, but evidence is not yet sufficient tosupport specific recommendations. Older people are vulnerable to losses in physical function capacity, and such losses predict loss of independence, falls, and even mortality. Thus, future studies aimed at pinpointing optimal protein intake in specific populations of older people need to include measures of physical function. © 2013 American Medical Directors Association, Inc. Source


Bollwein J.,IBA University | Diekmann R.,IBA University | Kaiser M.J.,IBA University | Bauer J.M.,Geriatric Center Oldenburg | And 3 more authors.
Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Year: 2013

Background.The etiology of the geriatric syndrome frailty is multifactorial. Besides hormonal and inflammatory processes, nutritional influences may be of major relevance. In this cross-sectional study, the association between dietary quality and frailty was investigated.Methods.In 192 community-dwelling older volunteers (>75 years), an interview-based food frequency questionnaire was used to assess nutritional data. A Mediterranean diet (MED) score (maximum 9 points) was used to evaluate dietary quality. Frailty was defined as the presence of at least three and prefrailty as the presence of one or two of the following criteria: weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, low handgrip strength, and slow walking speed. Older adults without any of these attributes were defined as "nonfrail" Binomial logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk of being frail (vs prefrail and nonfrail) in each quartile (vs lowest quartile) of the MED score.Results.The mean (SD) age of the participants was 83 (4) years; 41.1% were prefrail and 15.1% were frail. The risk of being frail was significantly reduced in the highest quartile of the MED score (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-0.98).Conclusions.A healthy dietary pattern is associated with a lower risk of being frail. Larger, prospective and interventional studies are needed to clarify the association between dietary quality and frailty. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. Source


Bollwein J.,IBA University | Diekmann R.,IBA University | Kaiser M.J.,IBA University | Bauer J.M.,Geriatric Center Oldenburg | And 3 more authors.
Nutrition Journal | Year: 2013

Background: To preserve muscle mass and therefore limit the risk of disability in older adults protein intake is seen as important factor. Besides the amount of protein, its distribution over the day is thought to affect protein anabolism. This cross-sectional study investigates the association between the amount and distribution of protein intake and frailty in older adults. Methods. In 194 community-dwelling seniors (≥75 years) amount of protein intake and its distribution over the day (morning, noon, evening) were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. Unevenness of protein distribution was calculated as coefficient of variation (CV). Frailty was defined as the presence of at least three, pre-frailty as the presence of one or two of the following criteria: weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, low handgrip strength and slow walking speed. Results: 15.4% of the participants were frail, 40.5% were pre-frail. Median (min.-max.) daily protein intake was 77.5 (38.5-131.5) g, 1.07 (0.58-2.27) g/kg body weight (BW) and 15.9 (11.2-21.8) % of energy intake without significant differences between the frailty groups. The risk of frailty did not differ significantly between participants in the higher compared to the lowest quartile of protein intake. Frail participants consumed significantly less protein in the morning (11.9 vs. 14.9 vs. 17.4%, p = 0,007), but more at noon (61.4 vs. 60.8 vs. 55.3%, p = 0.024) than pre-frail and non-frail. The median (min.-max.) CV of protein distribution was highest in frail (0.76 (0.18-1.33)) compared to pre-frail (0.74 (0.07-1.29)) and non-frail (0.68 (0.15-1.24)) subjects (p = 0.024). Conclusions: In this sample of healthy older persons, amount of protein intake was not associated with frailty, but distribution of protein intake was significantly different between frail, pre-frail and non-frail participants. More clinical studies are needed to further clarify the relation between protein intake and frailty. © 2013 Bollwein et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source


Drey M.,Friedrich - Alexander - University, Erlangen - Nuremberg | Krieger B.,Friedrich - Alexander - University, Erlangen - Nuremberg | Sieber C.C.,Friedrich - Alexander - University, Erlangen - Nuremberg | Bauer J.M.,Friedrich - Alexander - University, Erlangen - Nuremberg | And 3 more authors.
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association | Year: 2014

Objectives: Sarcopenia, age-related muscle wasting, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the affected individuals. The pathogenesis of sarcopenia is not yet fully understood. A multifactorial concept is currently favored. The reduced number of motor units as a potential mechanism of muscle mass loss is explored in the present study. Design: This is a cross-sectional study. Setting: The participants were community-dwelling older adults. Participants: The participants were sarcopenic (75) and nonsarcopenic (74) according to the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People aged 65 to 94 years. Measurements: The motor unit number index (MUNIX) of the hypothenar muscle was used to assess the number and size [motor unit size index (MUSIX)] of motor units. Results: The participants with pathologic MUNIX and MUSIX (n= 23) are significantly more frequently sarcopenic (n= 17, P= .029) than nonsarcopenic (n= 6). The participants with pathologic MUNIX and MUSIX (n= 23) had significantly less muscle mass than the nonsarcopenic controls (P < .001). After adjusting for age and sex, only gait speed has shown no difference between the 2 groups. Pearson's correlation coefficient between MUSIX and the reciprocal value of MUNIX is 0.87 (P < .001). Conclusions: Sarcopenia induced by a small number of motoneurons can be identified by applying the MUNIX method to the hypothenar muscle. An enlargement of motor units because of motoneuron loss seems to preserve physical performance. © 2014 American Medical Directors Association, Inc. Source


Drey M.,Friedrich - Alexander - University, Erlangen - Nuremberg | Zech A.,University of Hamburg | Freiberger E.,Friedrich - Alexander - University, Erlangen - Nuremberg | Bertsch T.,Institute for Clinical Chemistry | And 4 more authors.
Gerontology | Year: 2012

Background: It has been unclear which training mode is most effective and feasible for improving physical performance in the risk group of prefrail community-dwelling older adults. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of strength training (ST) versus power training (PT) on functional performance in prefrail older adults. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00783159. Methods: 69 community-dwelling older adults (>65 years) who were prefrail according to the definition of Fried were included in a 12-week exercise program. The participants were randomized into an ST group, a PT group and a control group. All participants were supplemented with vitamin D 3 orally before entering the intervention period. The primary outcome was the global score on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Secondary outcomes were muscle power, appendicular lean mass (aLM) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and self-reported functional deficits (Short Form of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument, SF-LLFDI). Results: Regarding changes in the SPPB score during the intervention, significant heterogeneity between the groups was observed (p = 0.023). In pair-wise comparisons, participants in both training groups significantly (PT: p = 0.012, ST: 0.009) increased their SPPB score (PT: Δ mean = 0.8, ST: Δ mean = 1.0) compared to the control group, with no statistical difference among training groups (p = 0.301). No statistical differences were found in changes in aLM (p = 0.769), muscle power (p = 0.308) and SF-LLFDI (p = 0.623) between the groups. Muscle power significantly increased (p = 0.017) under vitamin D 3 intake. Conclusions: In prefrail community-dwelling adults, PT is not superior to ST, although both training modes resulted in significant improvements in physical performance. With regard to dropout rates, ST appears to be advantageous compared to PT. The high prevalence of vitamin D 3 deficiency and the slight improvement of physical performance under vitamin D 3 supplementation among study participants underline the relevance of this approach in physical exercise interventions. © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel. Source

Discover hidden collaborations