Gastrointestinal Surgery

China

Gastrointestinal Surgery

China

Time filter

Source Type

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "Global Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery Market 2016-2025: Market Size, Share, Forecast and Strategy" report to their offering. Global demand for robotic gastrointestinal surgery in 2025 will advance to $1.41 billion. Technological advancement of robotic gastrointestinal surgery will continue to create smarter and more efficient assistive tools and devices to meet the needs of gastrointestinal surgery procedures across the globe. Compared with traditional minimally invasive surgery approaches, robot-assisted surgery gives the surgeon better control over the surgical instruments and a better view of the surgical site. Current open gastrointestinal surgeries and procedures can be replaced largely by robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) during the years to come. It is expected to see that many more gastrointestinal surgery procedures will be undertaken with at least some aspects of surgical robotics owing to the fast adoption of the advanced RMIS technology in hospitals and clinical centers. Global Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery Market 2016-2025: Market Size, Share, Forecast and Strategy is based on a comprehensive research of the robotic gastrointestinal surgery market by analyzing the entire global market and all its sub-segments through extensively detailed classifications. Profound analysis and assessment are generated from premium primary and secondary information sources with inputs derived from industry professionals across the value chain. In-depth qualitative analyses include identification and investigation of the following aspects: For more information about this report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/f8b6mv/global_robotic


Receive press releases from iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc.: By Email Electrosurgical Devices Market by Products, Application, End Users and Forecast to 2021, Upcoming Report by iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. Electrosurgical Devices Market by Device Type (Electrocautery Devices, Electrosurgical Accessories, Radiofrequency Electrosurgery Devices Monopolar, Bipolar), Application (Cardiology, Cosmetology, Dermatology, General Surgery, Gynecology, Urology, Dentistry and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Neurology, Oncology, Orthopedics) End Users (Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Hospitals, Specialized Clinics) and Forecast 2017-2021 Maryland Heights, MO, April 19, 2017 --( Browse Electrosurgical Devices Market by Device Type (Electrocautery Devices, Electrosurgical Accessories, Radiofrequency Electrosurgery Devices Monopolar, Bipolar), Application (Cardiology, Cosmetology, Dermatology, General Surgery, Gynecology, Urology, Dentistry and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Neurology, Oncology, Orthopedics) End Users (Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Hospitals, Specialized Clinics) and Forecast 2017-2021 at https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/electrosurgical-devices-market/ The global electrosurgical devices market segmentation is based on device type (electrocautery devices, electrosurgical accessories, radiofrequency electrosurgery devices – monopolar, bipolar), application (cardiology, cosmetology, dermatology, general surgery, gynecology, urology, dentistry and gastrointestinal surgery, neurology, oncology, orthopedics) end users (ambulatory surgical centers, hospitals, specialized clinics). The global electrosurgical devices market report provides market size (Revenue USD Million 2014 to 2021), market share, trends and forecasts growth trends (CAGR%, 2017 to 2021). The global electrosurgical devices market research report is further segmented by geography into North America (U.S., Canada), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of LA), Europe (U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Rest of EU), Asia Pacific (Japan, China, India, Rest of APAC), and Rest of the World. The global electrosurgical devices market report also provides the detailed market landscape (market drivers, restraints, opportunities), market attractiveness analysis and also tracks the major competitors operating in the market by company overview, financial snapshot, key products, technologies and services offered, market share analysis and recent trends in the global market. Major players operating in the global electrosurgical devices market and profiled in this report include B. Braun Melsungen AG, Boston Scientific Corporation, Bovie Medical Corporation, BOWA-electronic GmbH & Co. KG, Conmed, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., KLS Martin, Medtronic, Olympus, and Symmetry Surgical, Inc. 1. Device Type 1.1. Electrocautery Devices 1.2. Electrosurgical Accessories 1.3. Radiofrequency Electrosurgery Devices 1.3.1. Monopolar 1.3.2. Bipolar 2. Application 2.1. Cardiology 2.2. Cosmetology 2.3. Dermatology 2.4. General Surgery 2.5. Gynecology 2.6. Urology 2.7. Others (Dentistry and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Neurology, Oncology, Orthopedics, etc.) 3. End User 3.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers 3.2. Hospitals 3.3. Specialized Clinics 4. Geography (Region, Country) 4.1. North America (U.S., Canada) 4.2. Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of LA) 4.3. Europe (U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Rest of EU) 4.4. Asia Pacific (Japan, China, India, Rest of APAC) 4.5. Rest of the World 5. Company Profiles 5.1. B. Braun Melsungen AG 5.2. Boston Scientific Corporation 5.3. Bovie Medical Corporation 5.4. BOWA-electronic GmbH & Co. KG 5.5. Conmed 5.6. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH 5.7. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. 5.8. KLS Martin 5.9. Medtronic 5.10. Olympus 5.11. Symmetry Surgical, Inc. To request Table of Contents and Sample Pages of this report visit: https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/electrosurgical-devices-market/ About Us iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. is a global healthcare market research and consulting company providing market analysis, and competitive intelligence services to global clients. The company publishes syndicate, custom and consulting grade healthcare reports covering animal healthcare, biotechnology, clinical diagnostics, healthcare informatics, healthcare services, medical devices, medical equipment, and pharmaceuticals. In addition to multi-client studies, we offer creative consulting services and conduct proprietary single-client assignments targeted at client’s specific business objectives, information needs, time frame and budget. Please contact us to receive a proposal for a proprietary single-client study. Contact Us iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. 2109, Mckelvey Hill Drive, Maryland Heights, MO 63043 United States Email: sales@ihealthcareanalyst.com Website: https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com Maryland Heights, MO, April 19, 2017 --( PR.com )-- Electrosurgery is the application of a high-frequency (radio frequency) alternating polarity, electrical current to biological tissue as a means to cut, coagulate, desiccate, or fulgurate tissue. Electrosurgical devices are frequently used during surgical operations helping to prevent blood loss in hospital operating rooms or in outpatient procedures. Electrocautery uses heat conduction from a probe heated to a glowing temperature by a direct current. Electrosurgery, by contrast, uses radio frequency (RF) alternating current to heat the tissue by RF induced intracellular oscillation of ionized molecules that result in an elevation of intracellular temperature. RF Electrosurgery is commonly used in virtually all surgical disciplines including dermatological, gynecological, cardiac, plastic, ocular, spine, ENT, maxillofacial, orthopedic, urological, neuro- and general surgical procedures as well as certain dental procedures.Browse Electrosurgical Devices Market by Device Type (Electrocautery Devices, Electrosurgical Accessories, Radiofrequency Electrosurgery Devices Monopolar, Bipolar), Application (Cardiology, Cosmetology, Dermatology, General Surgery, Gynecology, Urology, Dentistry and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Neurology, Oncology, Orthopedics) End Users (Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Hospitals, Specialized Clinics) and Forecast 2017-2021 at https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/electrosurgical-devices-market/The global electrosurgical devices market segmentation is based on device type (electrocautery devices, electrosurgical accessories, radiofrequency electrosurgery devices – monopolar, bipolar), application (cardiology, cosmetology, dermatology, general surgery, gynecology, urology, dentistry and gastrointestinal surgery, neurology, oncology, orthopedics) end users (ambulatory surgical centers, hospitals, specialized clinics).The global electrosurgical devices market report provides market size (Revenue USD Million 2014 to 2021), market share, trends and forecasts growth trends (CAGR%, 2017 to 2021). The global electrosurgical devices market research report is further segmented by geography into North America (U.S., Canada), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of LA), Europe (U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Rest of EU), Asia Pacific (Japan, China, India, Rest of APAC), and Rest of the World. The global electrosurgical devices market report also provides the detailed market landscape (market drivers, restraints, opportunities), market attractiveness analysis and also tracks the major competitors operating in the market by company overview, financial snapshot, key products, technologies and services offered, market share analysis and recent trends in the global market.Major players operating in the global electrosurgical devices market and profiled in this report include B. Braun Melsungen AG, Boston Scientific Corporation, Bovie Medical Corporation, BOWA-electronic GmbH & Co. KG, Conmed, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., KLS Martin, Medtronic, Olympus, and Symmetry Surgical, Inc.1. Device Type1.1. Electrocautery Devices1.2. Electrosurgical Accessories1.3. Radiofrequency Electrosurgery Devices1.3.1. Monopolar1.3.2. Bipolar2. Application2.1. Cardiology2.2. Cosmetology2.3. Dermatology2.4. General Surgery2.5. Gynecology2.6. Urology2.7. Others (Dentistry and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Neurology, Oncology, Orthopedics, etc.)3. End User3.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers3.2. Hospitals3.3. Specialized Clinics4. Geography (Region, Country)4.1. North America (U.S., Canada)4.2. Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of LA)4.3. Europe (U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Rest of EU)4.4. Asia Pacific (Japan, China, India, Rest of APAC)4.5. Rest of the World5. Company Profiles5.1. B. Braun Melsungen AG5.2. Boston Scientific Corporation5.3. Bovie Medical Corporation5.4. BOWA-electronic GmbH & Co. KG5.5. Conmed5.6. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH5.7. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.5.8. KLS Martin5.9. Medtronic5.10. Olympus5.11. Symmetry Surgical, Inc.To request Table of Contents and Sample Pages of this report visit:https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/electrosurgical-devices-market/About UsiHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. is a global healthcare market research and consulting company providing market analysis, and competitive intelligence services to global clients. The company publishes syndicate, custom and consulting grade healthcare reports covering animal healthcare, biotechnology, clinical diagnostics, healthcare informatics, healthcare services, medical devices, medical equipment, and pharmaceuticals.In addition to multi-client studies, we offer creative consulting services and conduct proprietary single-client assignments targeted at client’s specific business objectives, information needs, time frame and budget. Please contact us to receive a proposal for a proprietary single-client study.Contact UsiHealthcareAnalyst, Inc.2109, Mckelvey Hill Drive,Maryland Heights, MO 63043United StatesEmail: sales@ihealthcareanalyst.comWebsite: https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com Click here to view the list of recent Press Releases from iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc.


Yang R.,Hubei Cancer Hospital | Yang R.,Huazhong University of Science and Technology | Zhang Y.,Huazhong University of Science and Technology | Zhou H.,Huazhong University of Science and Technology | And 5 more authors.
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring | Year: 2016

Recent studies suggest that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dosing by use of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters is superior to the traditional body surface area (BSA) method in colorectal cancer therapy. The purpose of this study was to compare the estimated efficacy and toxicity of the use of PK-guided versus BSA-based dose adjustment of 5-FU in advanced cancers. Methods: The authors searched from electronic databases (up to September, 2014) and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology held between 2000 and 2014 for studies comparing the response rate and toxicity in 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Results: Five eligible articles with 654 patients were included in double-arms and contained colorectal cancer, and head and neck cancer. PK-monitored 5-FU therapy was associated with significant improvement in overall response rate (odds ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.95, Z = 3.78, P = 0.0002) compared with the traditional BSA method. There was no evidence of improved tolerability: grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, neutropenia, and hand-foot syndrome were found not to be significantly different except that mucositis was less prominent for PK-monitored 5-FU therapy (odds ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.63, Z = 2.62, P = 0.009). Conclusions: In comparison with conventional BSA method, PK-based 5-FU dosage confirmed a superior overall response rate and improved toxicities irrespective of significant difference, the results of which indicated that PK-monitored 5-FU dosage has the potential to be performed in colorectal cancer personalized therapy. More high-quality and multicenter randomized controlled trails should be carried out to provide more information for comparing the response and toxicity of these 2 dose adjustment methods. © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.


Receive press releases from iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc.: By Email Global Minimally Invasive Surgery Market USD 9.8 Billion by 2020, Published by iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. Maryland Heights, MO, December 04, 2016 --( Visit the Minimally Invasive Surgery Market – Surgical Devices (Ablation Devices, Radiofrequency Ablation, Microwave Ablation, Cryoablation, Electrosurgical Devices, Medical Robotic Systems), Monitoring and Visualization Devices (X-Ray Devices, Computed Tomography Scanners, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment, Ultrasound Equipment, Endoscopy Devices), and Surgery Types (orthopedic Surgery, Spinal Surgery, Joint Replacement Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery, Breast Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Gynecological Surgery, Bariatric Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Urological Surgery) 2016-2020 report at https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/minimally-invasive-surgery-market/ Minimally-invasive procedures (minimally-invasive surgeries) have been enabled by the advance of various medical technologies. Minimally invasive surgery involves performing surgical procedures through small incisions where, the patients tend to have quicker recovery times and less discomfort than with conventional surgery. By the use of imaging techniques, interventional instruments could be directed throughout the body by way of catheters instead of large incisions needed in traditional surgery. The global minimally invasive surgery market report provides market size (Revenue USD Million 2013 to 2020), market share and forecasts growth trends (CAGR%, 2016 to 2020). The global minimally invasive surgery market segmentation is based on surgical devices (ablation devices, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, others, electrosurgical devices, medical robotic systems), monitoring and visualization devices (X-ray devices, computed tomography scanners, magnetic resonance imaging equipment, ultrasound equipment, endoscopy devices), and surgery types (orthopedic surgery, spinal surgery, joint replacement surgery, cosmetic surgery, breast surgery, vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, gynecological surgery, bariatric surgery, cardiac surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, urological surgery). The global minimally invasive surgery market report also provides the detailed market landscape (market drivers, restraints, opportunities), market attractiveness analysis and profiles of major competitors in the global market including company overview, financial snapshot, key products, technologies and services offered, and recent developments. The global minimally invasive surgery market research report is divided by geography (regional and country based) into North America (U.S., Canada), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of LA), Europe (U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Rest of EU), Asia Pacific (Japan, China, India, Rest of APAC), and Rest of the World. Major players operating in the global minimally invasive surgery market and included in this report are Abbott Laboratories, Inc., ArthroCare Corporation, Biomet, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., GE Healthcare, Given Imaging Ltd., Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Philips Healthcare, Siemens Healthcare, Stryker Corporation, Surgical Innovations Group plc., Teleflex, Inc., and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. To request Table of Contents and Sample Pages of this report visit: https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/minimally-invasive-surgery-market/ About Us iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. is a global health care market research and consulting company providing market analysis, and competitive intelligence services to global clients. The Company publishes syndicate, custom and consulting grade healthcare reports covering animal healthcare, biotechnology, clinical diagnostics, healthcare informatics, healthcare services, medical devices, medical equipment, and pharmaceuticals. iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. provides industry participants and stakeholders with strategically analyzed, unbiased view of market dynamics and business opportunities within its coverage areas. Contact Us iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. 2109, Mckelvey Hill Drive, Maryland Heights, MO 63043 United States Email: sales@ihealthcareanalyst.com Website: https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com Maryland Heights, MO, December 04, 2016 --( PR.com )-- The global minimally invasive surgery market is estimated to reach USD 9.8 Billion in 2020, growing at a CAGR of 6.4% from 2016 to 2020, published by iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc.Visit the Minimally Invasive Surgery Market – Surgical Devices (Ablation Devices, Radiofrequency Ablation, Microwave Ablation, Cryoablation, Electrosurgical Devices, Medical Robotic Systems), Monitoring and Visualization Devices (X-Ray Devices, Computed Tomography Scanners, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Equipment, Ultrasound Equipment, Endoscopy Devices), and Surgery Types (orthopedic Surgery, Spinal Surgery, Joint Replacement Surgery, Cosmetic Surgery, Breast Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Gynecological Surgery, Bariatric Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Urological Surgery) 2016-2020 report at https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/minimally-invasive-surgery-market/Minimally-invasive procedures (minimally-invasive surgeries) have been enabled by the advance of various medical technologies. Minimally invasive surgery involves performing surgical procedures through small incisions where, the patients tend to have quicker recovery times and less discomfort than with conventional surgery. By the use of imaging techniques, interventional instruments could be directed throughout the body by way of catheters instead of large incisions needed in traditional surgery.The global minimally invasive surgery market report provides market size (Revenue USD Million 2013 to 2020), market share and forecasts growth trends (CAGR%, 2016 to 2020).The global minimally invasive surgery market segmentation is based on surgical devices (ablation devices, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, others, electrosurgical devices, medical robotic systems), monitoring and visualization devices (X-ray devices, computed tomography scanners, magnetic resonance imaging equipment, ultrasound equipment, endoscopy devices), and surgery types (orthopedic surgery, spinal surgery, joint replacement surgery, cosmetic surgery, breast surgery, vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, gynecological surgery, bariatric surgery, cardiac surgery, gastrointestinal surgery, urological surgery).The global minimally invasive surgery market report also provides the detailed market landscape (market drivers, restraints, opportunities), market attractiveness analysis and profiles of major competitors in the global market including company overview, financial snapshot, key products, technologies and services offered, and recent developments. The global minimally invasive surgery market research report is divided by geography (regional and country based) into North America (U.S., Canada), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Rest of LA), Europe (U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Rest of EU), Asia Pacific (Japan, China, India, Rest of APAC), and Rest of the World.Major players operating in the global minimally invasive surgery market and included in this report are Abbott Laboratories, Inc., ArthroCare Corporation, Biomet, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., GE Healthcare, Given Imaging Ltd., Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., NuVasive, Inc., Philips Healthcare, Siemens Healthcare, Stryker Corporation, Surgical Innovations Group plc., Teleflex, Inc., and Varian Medical Systems, Inc.To request Table of Contents and Sample Pages of this report visit:https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com/report/minimally-invasive-surgery-market/About UsiHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. is a global health care market research and consulting company providing market analysis, and competitive intelligence services to global clients. The Company publishes syndicate, custom and consulting grade healthcare reports covering animal healthcare, biotechnology, clinical diagnostics, healthcare informatics, healthcare services, medical devices, medical equipment, and pharmaceuticals.iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc. provides industry participants and stakeholders with strategically analyzed, unbiased view of market dynamics and business opportunities within its coverage areas.Contact UsiHealthcareAnalyst, Inc.2109, Mckelvey Hill Drive,Maryland Heights, MO 63043United StatesEmail: sales@ihealthcareanalyst.comWebsite: https://www.ihealthcareanalyst.com Click here to view the list of recent Press Releases from iHealthcareAnalyst, Inc.


News Article | November 1, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Surgical Stapling Device is medical device which is used to place surgical staples. Surgical staples are specialized staples used in surgery in place of sutures to close skin wounds, connect or remove parts of the bowels or lungs. Scope of the Report: This report focuses on the Surgical Stapling Devices in Global market, especially in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa. This report categorizes the market based on manufacturers, regions, type and application. Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) Latin America, Middle East and Africa Market Segment by Applications, can be divided into Gastrointestinal Surgery Gynecologic Surgery Thoracic Surgery Others There are 13 Chapters to deeply display the global Surgical Stapling Devices market. Chapter 2, to analyze the top manufacturers of Surgical Stapling Devices, with sales, revenue, and price of Surgical Stapling Devices, in 2015 and 2016; Chapter 3, to display the competitive situation among the top manufacturers, with sales, revenue and market share in 2015 and 2016; Chapter 4, to show the global market by regions, with sales, revenue and market share of Surgical Stapling Devices, for each region, from 2011 to 2016; Chapter 5, 6, 7 and 8, to analyze the key regions, with sales, revenue and market share by key countries in these regions; Chapter 9 and 10, to show the market by type and application, with sales market share and growth rate by type, application, from 2011 to 2016; Chapter 11, Surgical Stapling Devices market forecast, by regions, type and application, with sales and revenue, from 2016 to 2021; Chapter 12 and 13, to describe Surgical Stapling Devices sales channel, distributors, traders, dealers, appendix and data source. Global Surgical Stapling Devices Market by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2021 1 Market Overview 1.1 Surgical Stapling Devices Introduction 1.2 Market Analysis by Type 1.2.1 Straight Surgical Stapling Devices 1.2.2 Curved Surgical Stapling Devices 1.2.3 Circular Surgical Stapling Devices 1.3 Market Analysis by Applications 1.3.1 Gastrointestinal Surgery 1.3.2 Gynecologic Surgery 1.3.3 Thoracic Surgery 1.4 Market Analysis by Regions 1.4.1 North America (USA, Canada and Mexico) 1.4.1.1 USA 1.4.1.2 Canada 1.4.1.3 Mexico 1.4.2 Europe (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy) 1.4.2.1 Germany 1.4.2.2 France 1.4.2.3 UK 1.4.2.4 Russia 1.4.2.5 Italy 1.4.3 Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India and Southeast Asia) 1.4.3.1 China 1.4.3.2 Japan 1.4.3.3 Korea 1.4.3.4 India 1.4.3.5 Southeast Asia 1.4.4 Latin America, Middle East and Africa 1.4.4.1 Brazil 1.4.4.2 Egypt 1.4.4.3 Saudi Arabia 1.4.4.4 South Africa 1.4.4.5 Nigeria 1.5 Market Dynamics 1.5.1 Market Opportunities 1.5.2 Market Risk 1.5.3 Market Driving Force 2 Manufacturers Profiles 2.1 J&J (Ethicon) 2.1.1 Business Overview 2.1.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.1.2.1 Type 1 2.1.2.2 Type 2 2.1.3 J&J (Ethicon) Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.2 Medtronic 2.2.1 Business Overview 2.2.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.2.2.1 Type 1 2.2.2.2 Type 2 2.2.3 Medtronic Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.3 B.Braun 2.3.1 Business Overview 2.3.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.3.2.1 Type 1 2.3.2.2 Type 2 2.3.3 B.Braun Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.4 BD 2.4.1 Business Overview 2.4.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.4.2.1 Type 1 2.4.2.2 Type 2 2.4.3 BD Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.5 Conmed 2.5.1 Business Overview 2.5.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.5.2.1 Type 1 2.5.2.2 Type 2 2.5.3 Conmed Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.6 Grena 2.6.1 Business Overview 2.6.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.6.2.1 Type 1 2.6.2.2 Type 2 2.6.3 Grena Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.7 Frankenman 2.7.1 Business Overview 2.7.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.7.2.1 Type 1 2.7.2.2 Type 2 2.7.3 Frankenman Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.8 Purple surgical 2.8.1 Business Overview 2.8.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.8.2.1 Type 1 2.8.2.2 Type 2 2.8.3 Purple surgical Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.9 Kangdi 2.9.1 Business Overview 2.9.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.9.2.1 Type 1 2.9.2.2 Type 2 2.9.3 Kangdi Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.10 Reach 2.10.1 Business Overview 2.10.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.10.2.1 Type 1 2.10.2.2 Type 2 2.10.3 Reach Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.11 Dextera Surgical 2.11.1 Business Overview 2.11.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.11.2.1 Type 1 2.11.2.2 Type 2 2.11.3 Dextera Surgical Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 2.12 Medizintechnik 2.12.1 Business Overview 2.12.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Type and Applications 2.12.2.1 Type 1 2.12.2.2 Type 2 2.12.3 Medizintechnik Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Price, Revenue, Gross Margin and Market Share 3 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Market Competition, by Manufacturer 3.1 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Market Share by Manufacturer 3.2 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Revenue and Market Share by Manufacturer 3.3 Market Concentration Rate 3.3.1 Top 3 Surgical Stapling Devices Manufacturer Market Share 3.3.2 Top 6 Surgical Stapling Devices Manufacturer Market Share 3.4 Market Competition Trend 4 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Market Analysis by Regions 4.1 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Revenue and Market Share by Regions 4.1.1 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Sales by Regions (2011-2016) 4.1.2 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Revenue by Regions (2011-2016) 4.2 North America Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 4.3 Europe Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 4.4 Asia-Pacific Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 4.5 Latin America Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 4.6 Middle East and Africa Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 5 North America Surgical Stapling Devices by Countries 5.1 North America Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Revenue and Market Share by Countries 5.1.1 North America Surgical Stapling Devices Sales by Countries (2011-2016) 5.1.2 North America Surgical Stapling Devices Revenue by Countries (2011-2016) 5.2 USA Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 5.3 Canada Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 5.4 Mexico Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 6 Europe Surgical Stapling Devices by Countries 6.1 Europe Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Revenue and Market Share by Countries 6.1.1 Europe Surgical Stapling Devices Sales by Countries (2011-2016) 6.1.2 Europe Surgical Stapling Devices Revenue by Countries (2011-2016) 6.2 Germany Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 6.3 UK Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 6.4 France Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 6.5 Russia Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 6.6 Italy Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 7 Asia-Pacific Surgical Stapling Devices by Countries 7.1 Asia-Pacific Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Revenue and Market Share by Countries 7.1.1 Asia-Pacific Surgical Stapling Devices Sales by Countries (2011-2016) 7.1.2 Asia-Pacific Surgical Stapling Devices Revenue by Countries (2011-2016) 7.2 China Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 7.3 Japan Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 7.4 Korea Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 7.5 India Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 7.6 Southeast Asia Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 8 Latin America, Middle East and Africa Surgical Stapling Devices by Countries 8.1 Latin America, Middle East and Africa Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Revenue and Market Share by Countries 8.1.1 Latin America, Middle East and Africa Surgical Stapling Devices Sales by Countries (2011-2016) 8.1.2 Latin America, Middle East and Africa Surgical Stapling Devices Revenue by Countries (2011-2016) 8.2 Brazil Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 8.3 Saudi Arabia Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 8.4 Egypt Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 8.5 Nigeria Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 8.6 South Africa Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Growth (2011-2016) 9 Surgical Stapling Devices Market Segment by Type 9.1 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 9.1.1 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 9.1.2 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 9.2 Straight Surgical Stapling Devices Sales Growth and Price 9.2.1 Global Straight Surgical Stapling Devices Sales Growth (2011-2016) 9.2.2 Global Straight Surgical Stapling Devices Price (2011-2016) 9.3 Curved Surgical Stapling Devices Sales Growth and Price 9.3.1 Global Curved Surgical Stapling Devices Sales Growth (2011-2016) 9.3.2 Global Curved Surgical Stapling Devices Price (2011-2016) 9.4 Circular Surgical Stapling Devices Sales Growth and Price 9.4.1 Global Circular Surgical Stapling Devices Sales Growth (2011-2016) 9.4.2 Global Circular Surgical Stapling Devices Price (2011-2016) 10 Surgical Stapling Devices Market Segment by Application 10.1 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Sales Market Share by Application (2011-2016) 10.2 Gastrointestinal Surgery Sales Growth (2011-2016) 10.3 Gynecologic Surgery Sales Growth (2011-2016) 10.4 Thoracic Surgery Sales Growth (2011-2016) 10.5 Others Sales Growth (2011-2016) 11 Surgical Stapling Devices Market Forecast (2016-2021) 11.1 Global Surgical Stapling Devices Sales, Revenue and Growth Rate (2016-2021) 11.2 Surgical Stapling Devices Market Forecast by Regions (2016-2021) 11.3 Surgical Stapling Devices Market Forecast by Type (2016-2021) 11.4 Surgical Stapling Devices Market Forecast by Application (2016-2021) 12 Sales Channel, Distributors, Traders and Dealers 12.1 Sales Channel 12.1.1 Direct Marketing 12.1.2 Indirect Marketing 12.1.3 Marketing Channel Future Trend 12.2 Distributors, Traders and Dealers 13 Appendix 13.1 Methodology 13.2 Analyst Introduction 13.3 Data SourceList of Tables and Figures Get It Now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=717174


This report studies Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market 2016, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, with production, revenue, consumption, import and export in these regions, from 2011 to 2015, and forecast to 2021. This report focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Medtronic PLC Aesculap, Inc Stryker Corporation Smith & Nephew PLC Ethicon Inc Abbott Laboratories, Inc Applied Medicals Conmed Corporation Zimmer Holdings, Inc KLS Martin GmbH B. Braun By types, the market can be split into Handheld Instruments Guiding Device Inflation Systems Auxiliary Instruments Cutter Instruments By Application, the market can be split into Cardiothoracic Surgery Vascular Surgery Cosmetic/Bariatric Surgery Gastrointestinal Surgery Gynecological Surgery Urological Surgery Orthopedic Surgery Others By Regions, this report covers (we can add the regions/countries as you want) North America China Europe Southeast Asia Japan India Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Professional Survey Report 2016 1 Industry Overview of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments 1.1 Definition and Specifications of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments 1.1.1 Definition of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments 1.1.2 Specifications of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments 1.2 Classification of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments 1.2.1 Handheld Instruments 1.2.2 Guiding Device 1.2.3 Inflation Systems 1.2.4 Auxiliary Instruments 1.2.5 Cutter Instruments 1.3 Applications of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments 1.3.1 Cardiothoracic Surgery 1.3.2 Vascular Surgery 1.3.3 Cosmetic/Bariatric Surgery 1.3.4 Gastrointestinal Surgery 1.3.5 Gynecological Surgery 1.3.6 Urological Surgery 1.3.7 Orthopedic Surgery 1.3.8 Others 1.4 Market Segment by Regions 1.4.1 North America 1.4.2 China 1.4.3 Europe 1.4.4 Southeast Asia 1.4.5 Japan 1.4.6 India 8 Major Manufacturers Analysis of Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments 8.1 Medtronic PLC 8.1.1 Company Profile 8.1.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.1.2.1 Type I 8.1.2.2 Type II 8.1.2.3 Type III 8.1.3 Medtronic PLC 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.1.4 Medtronic PLC 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.2 Aesculap, Inc 8.2.1 Company Profile 8.2.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.2.2.1 Type I 8.2.2.2 Type II 8.2.2.3 Type III 8.2.3 Aesculap, Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.2.4 Aesculap, Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.3 Stryker Corporation 8.3.1 Company Profile 8.3.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.3.2.1 Type I 8.3.2.2 Type II 8.3.2.3 Type III 8.3.3 Stryker Corporation 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.3.4 Stryker Corporation 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.4 Smith & Nephew PLC 8.4.1 Company Profile 8.4.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.4.2.1 Type I 8.4.2.2 Type II 8.4.2.3 Type III 8.4.3 Smith & Nephew PLC 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.4.4 Smith & Nephew PLC 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.5 Ethicon Inc 8.5.1 Company Profile 8.5.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.5.2.1 Type I 8.5.2.2 Type II 8.5.2.3 Type III 8.5.3 Ethicon Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.5.4 Ethicon Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.6 Abbott Laboratories, Inc 8.6.1 Company Profile 8.6.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.6.2.1 Type I 8.6.2.2 Type II 8.6.2.3 Type III 8.6.3 Abbott Laboratories, Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.6.4 Abbott Laboratories, Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.7 Applied Medicals 8.7.1 Company Profile 8.7.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.7.2.1 Type I 8.7.2.2 Type II 8.7.2.3 Type III 8.7.3 Applied Medicals 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.7.4 Applied Medicals 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.8 Conmed Corporation 8.8.1 Company Profile 8.8.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.8.2.1 Type I 8.8.2.2 Type II 8.8.2.3 Type III 8.8.3 Conmed Corporation 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.8.4 Conmed Corporation 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.9 Zimmer Holdings, Inc 8.9.1 Company Profile 8.9.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.9.2.1 Type I 8.9.2.2 Type II 8.9.2.3 Type III 8.9.3 Zimmer Holdings, Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.9.4 Zimmer Holdings, Inc 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.10 KLS Martin GmbH 8.10.1 Company Profile 8.10.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.10.2.1 Type I 8.10.2.2 Type II 8.10.2.3 Type III 8.10.3 KLS Martin GmbH 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.10.4 KLS Martin GmbH 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.11 B. Braun 8.11.1 Company Profile 8.11.2 Product Picture and Specifications 8.11.2.1 Type I 8.11.2.2 Type II 8.11.2.3 Type III 8.11.3 B. Braun 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.11.4 B. Braun 2015 Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Business Region Distribution Analysis Global QYResearch (http://globalqyresearch.com/ ) is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


Mukohyama J.,Kobe University | Shimono Y.,Kobe University | Yamashita K.,Gastrointestinal Surgery | Sumi Y.,Gastrointestinal Surgery | And 3 more authors.
Anticancer Research | Year: 2016

Background: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have a high tumorigenic ability to form patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs). PDXs are an attractive pre-clinical model, but gene expression and biological behavior of cancer cells in the tumor will change during establishment and passage of PDXs. Materials and Methods: Human colon cancer PDX was established and passaged either subcutaneously or orthotopically into the murine intestine. Histology and flow cytometric profile of the surgical specimen and the PDX were analyzed. CSCs were then isolated from the tumors and their microRNA (miRNA) expression was analyzed by semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results: The surgical specimens and PDXs were histologically similar. The size of CSC population increased and expression of miRNAs in CSCs changed in the passaged PDXs. Expression of oncogenic miRNAs was highly up-regulated in the CSCs of the orthotopically passaged PDXs. Conclusion: The xenotransplantation site and the number of tumor passages affect the miRNA expression of human colon CSCs.

Loading Gastrointestinal Surgery collaborators
Loading Gastrointestinal Surgery collaborators