Entity

Time filter

Source Type

Holderness, NH, United States

van Saun R.J.,Pennsylvania State University | Sniffen C.J.,Fencrest LLC
Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice | Year: 2014

In this article, an overview is presented of nutrient modeling to define energy and protein requirements of the late pregnant cow, and metabolic relationships between fetus and cow as they relate to nutrient utilization and risk for postparturient disease are discussed. Recommendations for formulating dry cow diets are provided, with emphasis on opportunities to minimize variation and risk for postparturient disease events. © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Source


Ferraretto L.F.,University of Wisconsin - Madison | Fonseca A.C.,University of Wisconsin - Madison | Sniffen C.J.,Fencrest LLC | Formigoni A.,University of Bologna | Shaver R.D.,University of Wisconsin - Madison
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2015

Selection for hybrids with greater starch and NDF digestibility may be beneficial for dairy producers. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of feeding a TMR containing a floury-leafy corn silage hybrid (LFY) compared with a brown midrib corn silage hybrid (BMR) for intake, lactation performance, and total-tract nutrient digestibility in dairy cows. Ninety-six multiparous Holstein cows, 105 ± 31. d in milk at trial initiation, were stratified by DIM and randomly assigned to 12 pens of 8 cows each. Pens were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments, BMR or LFY, in a completely randomized design; a 2-wk covariate period with cows fed a common diet followed by a 14-wk treatment period with cows fed their assigned treatment diet. Starch digestibilities, in situ, in vitro, and in vivo, were greater for LFY compared with BMR; the opposite was observed for NDF digestibility. Cows fed BMR consumed 1.7. kg/d more dry matter than LFY. Although, actual-, energy-, and solids-corrected milk yields were greater for BMR than LFY, feed conversions (kg of milk or component-corrected milk per kg of DMI) did not differ. Fat-corrected milk and milk fat yield were similar, as milk fat content was greater for cows fed LFY (4.05%) than BMR (3.83%). Cows fed BMR had lower milk urea nitrogen concentration, but greater milk protein and lactose yields compared with LFY. Body weight change and condition score were unaffected by treatment. Total-tract starch digestibility was greater for cows fed the LFY corn silage however, dry matter intake and milk and protein yields were greater for cows fed the BMR corn silage. Although total-tract starch digestibility was greater for cows fed the LFY corn silage, feed efficiency was not affected by hybrid type due to greater dry matter intake and milk and protein yields by cows fed the BMR corn silage. © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Source


Westendorf M.L.,Rutgers University | Wohlt J.E.,Rutgers University | Sniffen C.J.,Fencrest LLC | Ward R.T.,Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Inc.
Professional Animal Scientist | Year: 2014

This study analyzed wet brewers grain samples taken from a large commercial brewery. Samples (n = 48) taken over a 1-yr period averaged 33.1% CP (previous reports indicated CP% near or less than 30%). Low lysine concentrations and high RUP concentrations indicate a need for proper RUP and amino acid (AA) formulation. Samples were also divided and composited into low- and high-CP groups; every 3 samples, starting from the least to the greatest CP, were composited to produce 16 samples representative of the range in CP. These samples were analyzed for DM, CP, ammonia N, and AA concentration. The 8 lowest CP composites averaged 32.2% CP and the 8 highest averaged 34.0% CP. A difference was observed in AA concentrations (analyzed from borate-phosphate buffer residues, which contain insoluble true protein and are useful in determining RUP) between the 2 groups (P < 0.05), but AA profiles were consistent between the 2 CP composite groups. Fiber (NDF) fractions were analyzed both with and without added sulfite. This yielded different results between methods, as samples without added sulfite yielded NDF values greater than current published values; hence, the use of sulfite is recommended for NDF analysis. Fat, starch, sugar, and mineral concentrations were within ranges already published. © 2014 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Source


Bernard J.K.,University of Georgia | Chandler P.T.,Chandler and Associates | Sniffen C.J.,Fencrest LLC | Chalupa W.,University of Pennsylvania
Professional Animal Scientist | Year: 2014

Thirty Holstein cows (111 ± 18 DIM, 37.9 ± 5.6 kg/d of milk) were used in a crossover design trial with 2 periods of 3 wk each. Treatments included diets supplemented with 0 (CONT) or 37 g (LYS+) of rumen-protected Lys provided by Metabolys (H. J. Baker & Bros. Inc., Westport, CT). Diets were based on corn silage and formulated to provide adequate amounts of rumen-protected Met. No differences were observed in DMI, milk yield, or concentration of fat, lactose, or nonfat solids, but cows fed supplemental LYS+ had a greater concentration of milk protein and tended to have higher yields of milk fat, protein, and energy-corrected milk (ECM) than cows fed CONT. Cows fed LYS+ and producing more than 36 kg/d just before beginning the trial had greater concentrations of milk fat and yield of milk fat and ECM and tended to have higher milk protein concentrations compared with CONT. Cows producing less than 36 kg/d just before beginning the trial tended to have higher concentrations of milk protein when fed LYS+ compared with CONT, but no other differences were observed. The results of this trial with cows after peak lactation suggest feeding supplemental rumen-protected Lys to cows producing more than 36 kg/d can result in improved concentrations of fat and protein and yield of ECM, but cows producing less than 36 kg/d do not respond positively. © 2014 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists. Source


von Keyserlingk M.A.G.,University of British Columbia | Martin N.P.,U.S. Department of Agriculture | Kebreab E.,University of California at Davis | Knowlton K.F.,Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | And 6 more authors.
Journal of Dairy Science | Year: 2013

The US dairy industry has realized tremendous improvements in efficiencies and milk production since the 1940s. During this time, farm and total cow numbers have decreased and average herd size has increased. This intensification, combined with the shift to a largely urban public, has resulted in increased scrutiny of the dairy industry by social and environmental movements and increased concern regarding the dairy industry's sustainability. In response to these concerns, a group of scientists specializing in animal welfare, nutrient management, greenhouse gas emissions, animal science, agronomy, agricultural engineering, microbiology, and economics undertook a critical review of the US dairy industry. Although the US dairy system was identified as having significant strengths, the consensus was that the current structure of the industry lacks the resilience to adapt to changing social and environmental landscapes. We identified several factors affecting the sustainability of the US dairy industry, including climate change, rapid scientific and technological innovation, globalization, integration of societal values, and multidisciplinary research initiatives. Specific challenges include the westward migration of milk production in the United States (which is at odds with projected reductions in precipitation and associated limitations in water availability for cattle and crops), and the growing divide between industry practices and public perceptions, resulting in less public trust. Addressing these issues will require improved alignment between industry practices and societal values, based upon leadership from within the industry and sustained engagement with other interested participants, including researchers, consumers, and the general public. © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Source

Discover hidden collaborations