Federazione italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia FAVO

Rome, Italy

Federazione italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia FAVO

Rome, Italy
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

Baili P.,Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori | Di Salvo F.,Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori | de Lorenzo F.,Federazione italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia FAVO | Maietta F.,Centro Studi Investimenti Sociali CENSIS | And 18 more authors.
Supportive Care in Cancer | Year: 2016

Purpose: To illustrate the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs incurred by a population-based group of patients from 5 to 10 years since their cancer diagnosis in a country with a nationwide public health system. Methods: Interviews on OOP costs to a sample of 5–10 year prevalent cases randomly extracted from four population-based cancer registries (CRs), two in the north and two in the south of Italy. The patients’ general practitioners (GPs) gave assurance about the patient’s physical and psychological condition for the interview. A zero-inflated negative binomial model was used to analyze OOP cost determinants. Results: Two hundred six cancer patients were interviewed (48 % of the original sample). On average, a patient in the north spent €69 monthly, against €244 in the south. The main differences are for transport, room, and board (TRB) to reach the hospital and/or the cancer specialist (north €0; south €119). Everywhere, OOP costs without TRB costs were higher for patients with a low quality of life. Conclusions: Despite the limited participation, our study sample’s characteristics are similar to those of the Italian cancer prevalence population, allowing us to generalize the results. The higher OOP costs in the south may be due to the scarcity of oncologic structures, obliging patients to seek assistance far from their residence. Implications for cancer survivors Cancer survivors need descriptive studies to show realistic data about their status. Future Italian and European descriptive studies on cancer survivorship should be based on population CRs and involve GPs in order to approach the patient at best. © 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.


PubMed | Italian Association of Medical Oncologists AIOM, Trapani Cancer Registry, Associazione Senza Limiti, Inter institutional Epidemiology Unit and 5 more.
Type: Journal Article | Journal: Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer | Year: 2016

To illustrate the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs incurred by a population-based group of patients from 5 to 10 years since their cancer diagnosis in a country with a nationwide public health system.Interviews on OOP costs to a sample of 5-10 year prevalent cases randomly extracted from four population-based cancer registries (CRs), two in the north and two in the south of Italy. The patients general practitioners (GPs) gave assurance about the patients physical and psychological condition for the interview. A zero-inflated negative binomial model was used to analyze OOP cost determinants.Two hundred six cancer patients were interviewed (48 % of the original sample). On average, a patient in the north spent 69 monthly, against 244 in the south. The main differences are for transport, room, and board (TRB) to reach the hospital and/or the cancer specialist (north 0; south 119). Everywhere, OOP costs without TRB costs were higher for patients with a low quality of life.Despite the limited participation, our study samples characteristics are similar to those of the Italian cancer prevalence population, allowing us to generalize the results. The higher OOP costs in the south may be due to the scarcity of oncologic structures, obliging patients to seek assistance far from their residence. Implications for cancer survivors Cancer survivors need descriptive studies to show realistic data about their status. Future Italian and European descriptive studies on cancer survivorship should be based on population CRs and involve GPs in order to approach the patient at best.

Loading Federazione italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia FAVO collaborators
Loading Federazione italiana delle Associazioni di Volontariato in Oncologia FAVO collaborators