EOG Resources. Inc.

Tyler, TX, United States

EOG Resources. Inc.

Tyler, TX, United States
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

News Article | April 19, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

— The Global Construction Sand Market Research Report 2017is a professional and in-depth study on the current state of the Construction Sand industry. In a word, This report studies Construction Sand in Global market, especially in United States, EU, China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer. Key companies included in this research are Saint-Gobain, Bathgate Silica Sand, Nugent Sand, Pattison Sand, Pioneer Natural Resources, Select Sands, Sibelco, Mitsubishi, Quarzwerke, Tochu Corporation, Taiwan Glass Industry, Chongqing Changjiang Moulding Material, Zhuzhou Kibing Group, Holcim, Minerali Industriali, Haryana Ceramic & Allied Products Industries, EOG Resources Incorporated, Adwan Chemical Industries and Emerge Energy Services. Market Segment by Region, this report splits Global into several key Region, with sales, revenue, market share and growth rate of Construction Sand in these regions, from 2011 to 2022 (forecast), like United States, EU, China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Firstly, Construction Sand On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Natural Sand and Synthetic Sand. On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate of Construction Sand for each application, including Foundry, Construction, Ceramics & Refractories, Glass manufacturing and Other. 7 Global Construction Sand Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Saint-Gobain 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Construction Sand Product Category, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Product A 7.1.2.2 Product B 7.1.3 Saint-Gobain Construction Sand Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Bathgate Silica Sand 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Construction Sand Product Category, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Product A 7.2.2.2 Product B 7.2.3 Bathgate Silica Sand Construction Sand Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Nugent Sand 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Construction Sand Product Category, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Product A 7.3.2.2 Product B 7.3.3 Nugent Sand Construction Sand Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview Figure Picture of Construction Sand Figure Global Construction Sand Production (K MT) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Types (Product Category) (2012-2022) Figure Global Construction Sand Production Market Share by Types (Product Category) in 2016 Figure Product Picture of Natural Sand Table Major Manufacturers of Natural Sand Figure Product Picture of Synthetic Sand Table Major Manufacturers of Synthetic Sand Figure Global Construction Sand Consumption (K MT) by Applications (2012-2022) Figure Global Construction Sand Consumption Market Share by Applications in 2016 Figure Foundry Examples Figure Construction Examples Figure Ceramics & Refractories Examples Figure Glass manufacturing Examples Figure Other Examples Figure Global Construction Sand Market Size (Million USD), Comparison (K MT) and CAGR (%) by Regions (2012-2022) Figure North America Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure Europe Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure China Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure Japan Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure Southeast Asia Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure India Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) and Growth Rate (2012-2022) Figure Global Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) Status and Outlook (2012-2022) Figure Global Construction Sand Capacity, Production (K MT) Status and Outlook (2012-2022) Figure Global Construction Sand Major Players Product Capacity (K MT) (2012-2017) Table Global Construction Sand Capacity (K MT) of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Table Global Construction Sand Capacity Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Figure Global Construction Sand Capacity (K MT) of Key Manufacturers in 2016 Figure Global Construction Sand Capacity (K MT) of Key Manufacturers in 2017 Figure Global Construction Sand Major Players Product Production (K MT) (2012-2017) Table Global Construction Sand Production (K MT) of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Table Global Construction Sand Production Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) Figure 2016 Construction Sand Production Share by Manufacturers Figure 2017 Construction Sand Production Share by Manufacturers Figure Global Construction Sand Major Players Product Revenue (Million USD) (2012-2017) Table Global Construction Sand Revenue (Million USD) by Manufacturers (2012-2017) Table Global Construction Sand Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017) Table 2016 Global Construction Sand Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2017 Global Construction Sand Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Market Construction Sand Average Price (USD/MT) of Key Manufacturers (2012-2017) Figure Global Market Construction Sand Average Price (USD/MT) of Key Manufacturers in 2016 Table Manufacturers Construction Sand Manufacturing Base Distribution and Sales Area For more information, please visit http://www.reportsweb.com/global-construction-sand-market-research-report-2017


HOUSTON, April 18, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc. (“EGC” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:EXXI) today announced that it has appointed Douglas E. Brooks as Chief Executive Officer and President effective April 17, 2017.  The Board concurrently increased the size of EGC’s Board from six to seven directors and named Mr. Brooks to fill the newly-created directorship. Mr. Brooks has over 34 years of experience in the energy industry. Most recently he served as the Chief Executive Officer for Yates Petroleum Corporation, a privately-owned exploration and production company, from April 2015 until Yates’ merger with EOG Resources, Inc. in October 2016.  Mr. Brooks previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Oil & Gas Limited from October 2012 until June 2014, and as a Senior Vice President at Forest Oil Corporation from April 2012 until October 2012.  In addition, he spent 24 years with Marathon Oil Company in roles of increasing responsibility, lastly as the Director of Upstream Mergers and Acquisitions and Business Development for the Americas.  He has also built two private equity-sponsored firms focused on unconventional resource projects in the western U.S. Mr. Brooks currently serves on the Board of Directors of Chaparral Energy, Inc. and has served as a board member for Aurora Oil & Gas Limited, Magdalena Energy Company, Yates Petroleum and the Houston Producers’ Forum.  Additionally, he is currently an advisor for Hart Energy’s A&D Watch, a global energy research publication.  Mr. Brooks holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Management from the University of Wyoming – Casper and a Masters of Business Administration, Finance from Our Lady of the Lake University in Texas. Michael S. Reddin, EGC’s Chairman of the Board commented, "On behalf of our Board of Directors, we are extremely pleased to welcome Doug Brooks to assume our senior leadership role at Energy XXI.  Doug’s impeccable reputation, extensive industry experience and clear track record of value creation as Chief Executive at other exploration and production companies make him the perfect fit for our Company. His skills are also highly complementary to those of Scott Heck, our Chief Operating Officer, who has an extensive offshore, engineering and operations background.  We look forward to having the powerful combination of Doug and Scott at the top of Energy XXI as we develop and execute strategies to maximize stockholder value.” Douglas E. Brooks, Chief Executive Officer and President remarked, “The confidence shown by the Board of Directors in asking me to lead their experienced technical and financial teams is greatly appreciated.  Energy XXI is at an inflection point in its history since it has emerged from restructuring with a strong balance sheet that provides maximum flexibility for future value creation.  I look forward to working with our Board, senior management, our technical and financial teams, and our stockholders as we plan and execute our new path forward.” This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements, including those relating to the intent, beliefs, plans, or expectations of EGC are based upon current expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors and the following list should not be considered a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties relating to emergence from Chapter 11 or a change in EGC’s senior management team, including, but not limited to: (i) the effects of the departure of EGC’s senior leaders on the Company’s employees, suppliers, regulators and business counterparties, (ii) the increased advisory costs incurred in connection with executing the reorganization, (iii) the impact of restrictions in the exit financing on EGC’s ability to make capital investments and pursue strategic growth opportunities and (iv) other risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results, including project plans and related expenditures and resource recoveries, to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. For a more detailed discussion of risk factors, please see Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Transition Report on Form 10-K for the transition period ended December 31, 2016 filed by EGC for more information. EGC will file reports and other information with the SEC going forward. EGC assumes no obligation and expressly disclaims any duty to update the information contained herein except as required by law. Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc. is an independent oil and natural gas development and production company whose assets are primarily located in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico waters offshore Louisiana and Texas.  The Company’s near-term strategy emphasizes exploitation of key assets, enhanced by its focus on financial discipline and operational excellence. To learn more, visit EGC’s website at www.EnergyXXI.com.


News Article | May 23, 2017
Site: www.ogj.com

EOG Resources Inc., Houston, and global alternative asset manager Carlyle Group LP have formed a combine for development of EOG’s oil and gas assets in Ellis County, Okla.


Patent
EOG Resources. Inc. | Date: 2016-08-24

A plunger piston assembly for a plunger lift system used to remove fluids from a subterranean wellbore includes a sealing sleeve having a central axis, an upper end, a lower end, and a throughbore extending axially from the upper end of the sealing sleeve to the lower end of the sealing sleeve. The throughbore of the sealing sleeve defines a receptacle extending axially from the lower end of the sealing sleeve. In addition, the plunger piston assembly includes an intermediate sleeve having a central axis, an upper end, a lower end, and a throughbore extending axially from the upper end of the intermediate sleeve to the lower end of the intermediate sleeve. The throughbore of the intermediate sleeve defines a receptacle extending axially from the lower end of the intermediate sleeve. The upper end of the intermediate sleeve is configured to be removably seated in the receptacle of the sealing sleeve. Further, the plunger piston assembly includes a plug configured to be removably seated in the in the receptacle of the intermediate sleeve.


News Article | May 10, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.com

EOG is also scheduled to present at the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference at 3 p.m. Central time (4 p.m. Eastern time) on Wednesday, May 31. William R. "Bill" Thomas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, will present on behalf of EOG. Please visit the Investors/Overview page on the EOG website to access the live webcasts. If you are unable to listen live, replays will be available on the Investors/Presentations and Events page for six months. EOG Resources, Inc. is one of the largest independent (non-integrated) crude oil and natural gas companies in the United States with proved reserves in the United States, Trinidad, the United Kingdom and China.  EOG Resources, Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is traded under the ticker symbol "EOG."  To learn more about EOG, visit the website at www.eogresources.com. To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/eog-resources-to-present-at-upcoming-energy-conferences-300455581.html


OPEC will “do whatever it takes” to rebalance the global oil market, said Saudi Oil Minister Khalid al-Falih in a speech Monday in Kuala Lumpur. He expects OPEC to extend its 1.8 million barrel per day production cut at least to the end of the year. Oil prices retraced some recent losses on the news, with Brent around $49.50 and WTI at $46.50. If oil does regain $50, it’ll be holding on by its fingernails. Quarterly earnings reports of the U.S. drillers have been relatively rosy. Many drillers took advantage of $55 oil prices to lock in their economics in burgeoning fields like the Permian basin, where production volumes have leaped by 400,000 bpd in recent months. The U.S. rig count last week was 877, up from 462 a year ago — most of those crews have gone back to work in the Permian. All told, it looks like another a new American oil boom is taking hold before the glut from the last one even gets worked off. U.S. oil production bottomed last October at 8.5 million bpd. Then OPEC agreed to its cuts, which gave the Americans all the encouragment they needed. Now, the U.S. Energy Information Administration figures we’re at 9.3 million bpd — up 800,000 bpd in just six months. At this rate U.S. output will hit 9.9 million bpd by year’s end — would be an all time record. So if the first round of OPEC cuts didn’t work, why should their continuation to finally do the trick? Time will solve the glut. The International Energy Agency figures that global oil output (including the U.S.) has fallen 800,000 bpd year-over-year. It predicts world oil demand to grow 1.3 million bpd this year. Falling supplies and rising demand will clear the market, in time. And yet in recent months global oil stocks have grown as refiners have shut down for maintenance, thus delaying the rebalancing. Amrita Sen, analyst with Energy Aspects, says that although OPEC members have cut production, but have been slower to reduce exports, preferring to sell out of their own sloshing inventories. With refinery turnarounds complete and the driving season set to kick into gear, global oil demand should strengthen in the months ahead. Good thing. Because American drillers are getting better all the time at coaxing out more oil, at lower cost. In a note this morning Zach Parham at Jefferies & Co. singled out Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR), which has employed enhanced completion designs, injecting more sand and fracturing shorter stages in order to boost per-well performance 60% in the Bakken and the Springer shales. Noble Corp (NYSE:NBL) says it has boosted the amount of sand it injects in its hydraulic fracturing to as much as 2.5 tons per lateral foot, and seen a resulting 50% increase in oil production. The Americans are continuously discovering new shale layers worth fracking. Occidental and ExxonMobil and Chevron say they have enough acreage in the Permian to drill for decades -- profitable down to $40 oil. BP and Chesapeake are enthusiastic about the Powder River Basin. Continental likes the Sycamore shale, a layer of oil-soaked rock overlaying the Woodford shale in Oklahoma. Newfield (NYSE:NFX) is putting $100 million into a new play there called SCORE, short for Sycamore, Caney, Osage, Resource Expansion. As Lee Boothby, CEO of Newfield said on his earnings call: “We and our friends in industry are at the point that we all said that we'd get to where we start evaluating these other horizons.” There’s plenty of cash for those friends. Former CEO of EOG Resources Mark Papa is now drilling in the Permian with Centennial Resource Development (CDEV). James Hackett, former CEO of Anadarko Petroleum, has a $1 billion blank check with Silver Run Acquisition II. Private equity goliath Texas Pacific Group recently floated 10 million shares at $6 in an IPO for black-check oil company TPG Pace Equity Holdings. That one is run by fomer CEO of Occidental Petroleum Steve Chazen. The only solace for OPEC? It’s getting expensive for America’s frackers to keep it up. CEO Steven Gray of RSP Permian says he’s seen costs up 20%, especially for sand and steel. Steve Schlotterbeck, CEO of EQT, said on his earnings call that they’ve had a hard time keeping their fracking crews around — “A couple of our frac contractors decided to pay us the penalties to take their frac crews to job that were more profitable.” Good job opportunity there. Senior Editor Chris Helman is based in Houston, Texas. Contact him on Twitter @chrishelman.


News Article | May 10, 2017
Site: news.yahoo.com

A pumpjack brings oil to the surface in the Monterey Shale, California, in a file photo. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on Wednesday rejected a resolution to revoke an Obama-era rule to limit methane emissions from oil and gas production on federal lands, dealing a blow to President Donald Trump's efforts to free the drilling industry from what he sees as excessive environmental regulation. The Congressional Review Act resolution received just 49 votes after Republican leaders scrambled for weeks to secure the 51 needed to pass it. The resolution would have revoked the rule and prevented similar regulations from being introduced. Getting the Trump administration to repeal the BLM rule had been a top priority of the oil and gas industry. Companies said it was unnecessary, would could cost them tens of thousands of dollars per well and hinder production. But not all Republicans supported the measure, in part because it would have made regulating methane waste more difficult in the future. Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona made a surprise vote against the resolution, joining fellow Republicans Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine in opposition to torpedo it. "While I am concerned that the BLM rule may be onerous, passage of the resolution would have prevented the federal government, under any administration, from issuing a rule that is ‘similar’," McCain said in a statement. He said the Interior Department should issue a new rule on to replace the existing one on methane leaks, which he called a public health and air quality issue. The rule, finalized by President Barack Obama in his last weeks in office, updated 30-year-old regulations that govern flaring, venting and natural gas leaks from oil and gas production. Obama's administration said it would preserve up to 41 billion cubic feet (BCF) of natural gas per year that is currently lost to leaks and flaring. The American Petroleum Institute and other industry groups have said the methane rule is unnecessary because companies have made strides in reducing leaks on their own. "The rule could impede U.S. energy production while reducing local and federal revenues," said Erik Milito, API's Upstream and Industry Operations Group Director. Members of the Western Energy Alliance, which include Devon Energy , Whiting Petroleum and EOG Resources had also been strongly opposed to the rule. Environmental groups hailed what they depicted as a rare victory for the environment after several regulatory rollbacks by the Trump administration. “In recent months, thousands of Americans asked the Senate to stand up for clean air and against the oil lobby, and their efforts were successful today," said Jamie Williams, president of the Wilderness Society. The Western Values Project estimated that if the rule had been rescinded, the U.S. Treasury would have lost out on $800 million in lost potential royalties from leaked or vented natural gas over the next decade. Republican Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works who supported the resolution to kill the rule, called on Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to act unilaterally to revoke it.


Patent
EOG Resources. Inc. | Date: 2014-10-28

A method for determining a hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir quality prior to a hydraulic fracture treatment based on completions index is disclosed. The method comprises a step performing a test determining a hydraulic pressure at which a hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir will begin to fracture by pumping a fluid in a wellbore, wherein the wellbore extends from a surface to the reservoir and the wellbore has one or more perforations in communication with reservoir; a step generating a pressure transient in the wellbore, the pressure transient travels from the surface to the reservoir through the perforations and reflects back the surface after contacting the reservoir; a step measuring response of the pressure transient at sufficiently high sampling frequency; a step determining fracture hydraulic parameters of the perforations and the reservoir using the measured response; and optimizing a stimulation treatment to the reservoir based on the determined fracture hydraulic parameters.


Patent
EOG Resources. Inc. | Date: 2016-07-28

A method for determining a hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir quality prior to a hydraulic fracture treatment based on completions index is disclosed. The method comprises a step performing a test determining a hydraulic pressure at which a hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir will begin to fracture by pumping a fluid in a wellbore, wherein the wellbore extends from a surface to the reservoir and the wellbore has one or more perforations in communication with reservoir; a step generating a pressure transient in the wellbore, the pressure transient travels from the surface to the reservoir through the perforations and reflects back the surface after contacting the reservoir; a step measuring response of the pressure transient at sufficiently high sampling frequency; a step determining fracture hydraulic parameters of the perforations and the reservoir using the measured response; and optimizing a stimulation treatment to the reservoir based on the determined fracture hydraulic parameters.


Patent
EOG Resources. Inc. | Date: 2014-12-01

A fracturing fluid that includes the combination of liquid ammonia and a proppant, and a method for fracturing an underground formation by pumping this fracturing fluid into a wellbore that extends to the formation. The process includes generating pressure in the wellbore, creating fractures in the formation using the liquid or gelled ammonia and proppant slurry, and releasing pressure from the wellbore. The ammonia released from the liquid or gelled ammonia helps stabilize clays in the formation and the proppant helps to maintain the fractures in the formation.

Loading EOG Resources. Inc. collaborators
Loading EOG Resources. Inc. collaborators