Shao C.,Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions |
Bai W.,Shenyang University |
Junn J.C.,New York Medical College |
Uemura M.,Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions |
And 8 more authors.
Oral Oncology | Year: 2011
The transcription factor MYB was recently proposed to be a promising oncogene candidate in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). However, the up-regulation of MYB in ACC could not be explained solely by deletion of its 3′ end. It is widely accepted that the promoter methylation status can regulate the transcription of genes, especially in human cancers. Therefore, it is important to know whether MYB promoter demethylation could explain the over-expression of MYB in ACC. By using the Methprimer program, we identified nine CpG islands in the promoter of MYB. All of these CpG islands were located within the -864 to +2082 nt region relative to the transcription start site of MYB. We then used bisulfite genomic sequencing to evaluate the methylation levels of the CpG islands of MYB in 18 primary ACC tumors, 13 normal salivary gland tissues and nine cancer cell lines. Using cell lines, we also determined the relative MYB expression levels and correlated these with the methylation levels. With bisulfite genomic sequencing, we found no detectable methylation in the CpG islands of MYB in either ACC or normal salivary gland tissues. There was a variable degree of MYB expression in the cell lines tested, but none of these cell lines demonstrated promoter methylation. Promoter hypomethylation does not appear to explain the differential expression of MYB in ACC. An alternative mechanism needs to be proposed for the transcriptional control of MYB in ACC. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Klamerus J.F.,David H Koch Cancer Research Building |
Bruinooge S.S.,American Society of Clinical Oncology |
Ye X.,David H Koch Cancer Research Building |
Klamerus M.L.,Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research |
And 8 more authors.
Clinical Cancer Research | Year: 2010
Purpose: Cancer patients at Johns Hopkins undergo insurance clearance to verify coverage for enrollment to interventional clinical trials. We sought to explore the impact of insurance clearance on disparities in access to cancer clinical trials at this urban comprehensive cancer center. Experimental Design: We evaluated the frequency of insurance-based denial of access to cancer clinical trials over a 5-year period after initiation of a formal insurance clearance process. We used a case-control design to compare demographic and clinical parameters of patients denied or approved for clinical trials participation by their insurance company in a 3-year interval. Results: From July 2003 to July 2008, insurance requests for clinical trial participation were submitted on 4,617 consented cancer patients at Johns Hopkins. A total of 628 patients (13.6%) with health insurance were denied therapeutic trial enrollment owing to lack of insurance coverage for participation. A total of 254 patients denied enrollment from 2005 to 2007 were selected for further analysis. Two-hundred sixty randomly selected patients approved for clinical trial participation served as controls. Patients approved were on average older (59.2 versus 54.9 years) than patients denied (P = 0.0001). Residents of Pennsylvania, which lacks a state law mandating cancer clinical trial coverage for residents, were overrepresented among the denied patients (P = 0.0009). No statistically significant variance in the likelihood of insurance denial was found on the basis of sex, race, stage of disease, or presence of comorbidities. Conclusions: Denial of access to therapeutic clinical trials, even among insured patients, is a significant barrier to clinical cancer research. This barrier spans racial, ethnic, and gender categories. ©2010 AACR.