Francis E.R.,New York Medical College |
Francis E.R.,Pennsylvania State University |
Goodsmith N.,Weill Cornell Rockefeller Sloan Kettering Tri Institutional |
Michelow M.,New York Medical College |
And 12 more authors.
Academic Medicine | Year: 2012
Since 2009, a multidisciplinary team at Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC) has collaborated to create a comprehensive, elective global health curriculum (GHC) for medical students. Increasing student interest sparked the development of this program, which has grown from ad hoc lectures and dispersed international electives into a comprehensive four-year elective pathway with over 100 hours of training, including three courses, two international experiences, a preceptorship with a clinician working with underserved populations in New York City, and regular lectures and seminars by visiting global health leaders. Student and administrative enthusiasm has been strong: In academic years 2009, 2010, and 2011, over half of the first-year students (173 of 311)participated in some aspect of the GHC, and 18% (55 of 311) completed all first-year program requirements.The authors cite the student-driven nature of GHC as a major factor in its success and rapid growth. Also important was the foundation previously established by WCMC global health faculty, the serendipitous timing of the GHC's development in the midst of curricular reform and review, as well as the presence of a full-time, nonclinical Global Health Fellow who served as a program coordinator. Given the enormous expansion of medical student interest in global health training throughout the United States and Canada over the past decade, the authors hope that medical schools developing similar programs will find the experience at Weill Cornell informative and helpful.
Integration of comprehensive women's health programmes into health systems: Cervical cancer prevention, care and control in Rwanda [Intégration de programmes de soins complets pour les femmes dans les systèmes de santé: Prévention, traitement et lutte contre le cancer du col de l'utérus au Rwanda]
Binagwaho A.,Ministry of Health of Rwanda |
Ngabo F.,Ministry of Health of Rwanda |
Wagner C.M.,Global Health Delivery Partnership |
Mugeni C.,Ministry of Health of Rwanda |
And 3 more authors.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization | Year: 2013
Problem Although it is highly preventable and treatable, cervical cancer is the most common and most deadly cancer among women in Rwanda. Approach By mobilizing a diverse coalition of partnerships, Rwanda became the first country in Africa to develop and implement a national strategic plan for cervical cancer prevention, screening and treatment. Local setting Rwanda - a small, landlocked nation in East Africa with a population of 10.4 million - is well positioned to tackle a number of "high-burden" noncommunicable diseases. The country's integrated response to infectious diseases has resulted in steep declines in premature mortality over the past decade. Relevant changes In 2011-2012, Rwanda vaccinated 227 246 girls with all three doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Among eligible girls, three-dose coverage rates of 93.2% and 96.6% were achieved in 2011 and 2012, respectively. The country has also initiated nationwide screening and treatment programmes that are based on visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid, testing for HPV DNA, cryotherapy, the loop electrosurgical excision procedure and various advanced treatment options. Lessons learnt Low-income countries should begin to address cervical cancer by integrating prevention, screening and treatment into routine women's health services. This requires political will, cross-sectoral collaboration and planning, innovative partnerships and robust monitoring and evaluation. With external support and adequate planning, high nationwide coverage rates for HPV vaccination and screening for cervical cancer can be achieved within a few years.
De Assis A.M.,University of Sao Paulo |
Moreira A.M.,University of Sao Paulo |
De Paula Rodrigues V.C.,University of Sao Paulo |
Yoshinaga E.M.,University of Sao Paulo |
And 4 more authors.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | Year: 2015
Purpose To describe the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with spherical microparticles to treat lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with prostate volume > 90 g.Materials and Methods This prospective, single-center, single-arm study was conducted in 35 patients with prostate volumes ranging from 90-252 g. Mean patient age was 64.8 years (range, 53-77 y). Magnetic resonance imaging, uroflowmetry, and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were used to assess clinical and functional outcomes.Results Mean prostate size decreased significantly from 135.1 g before PAE to 91.9 g at 3 months of follow-up (P <.0001). Mean IPSS and quality-of-life index improved from 18.3 to 2.7 and 4.8 to 0.9 (P <.0001 for both), respectively. A significant negative correlation was observed between prostate-specific antigen at 24 hours after PAE and IPSS 3 months after PAE (P =.0057).Conclusions PAE is a safe and effective treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with prostate volume > 90 g. Excessively elevated prostate-specific antigen within 24 hours of PAE is associated with lower symptom burden in short-term follow-up. © 2015 SIR.
Han P.K.J.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation |
Han P.K.J.,Tufts University |
Joekes K.,St Georges, University of London |
Elwyn G.,Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science |
And 6 more authors.
Patient Education and Counseling | Year: 2014
Objective: To develop, pilot, and evaluate a curriculum for teaching clinical risk communication skills to medical students. Methods: A new experience-based curriculum, "Risk Talk," was developed and piloted over a 1-year period among students at Tufts University School of Medicine. An experimental study of 2nd-year students exposed vs. unexposed to the curriculum was conducted to evaluate the curriculum's efficacy. Primary outcome measures were students' objective (observed) and subjective (self-reported) risk communication competence; the latter was assessed using an Observed Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) employing new measures. Results: Twenty-eight 2nd-year students completed the curriculum, and exhibited significantly greater (p < .001) objective and subjective risk communication competence than a convenience sample of 24 unexposed students. New observational measures of objective competence in risk communication showed promising evidence of reliability and validity. The curriculum was resource-intensive. Conclusion: The new experience-based clinical risk communication curriculum was efficacious, although resource-intensive. More work is needed to develop the feasibility of curriculum delivery, and to improve the measurement of competence in clinical risk communication. Practice implications: Risk communication is an important advanced communication skill, and the Risk Talk curriculum provides a model educational intervention and new assessment tools to guide future efforts to teach and evaluate this skill. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Tai-Seale M.,View Medical |
Elwyn G.,Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science |
Wilson C.J.,Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute |
Stults C.,Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute |
And 5 more authors.
Health Affairs | Year: 2016
Patient-provider communication and shared decision making are essential for primary care delivery and are vital contributors to patient experience and health outcomes. To alleviate communication shortfalls, we designed a novel, multidimensional intervention aimed at nudging both patients and primary care providers to communicate more openly. The intervention was tested against an existing intervention, which focused mainly on changing patients' behaviors, in four primary care clinics involving 26 primary care providers and 300 patients. Study results suggest that compared to usual care, both the novel and existing interventions were associated with better patient reports of how well primary care providers engaged them in shared decision making. Future research should build on the work in this pilot to rigorously examine the comparative effectiveness and scalability of these interventions to improve shared decision making at the point of care. © 2016 Project HOPE- The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.