Entity

Time filter

Source Type


Kuemmerle A.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute | Kuemmerle A.,University of Basel | Kuemmerle A.,CRP Sante | Dodoo A.N.O.,University of Ghana | And 5 more authors.
Malaria Journal | Year: 2011

Background: In spite of enhanced control efforts, malaria remains a major public health problem causing close to a million deaths annually. With support from several donors, large amounts of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) are being deployed in endemic countries raising safety concerns as little is known about the use of ACT in several of the settings where they are deployed. This project was undertaken to profile the provenance of the pharmacovigilance reporting of all anti-malarials, including ACT to the WHO adverse drug reaction (ADR) database (Vigibase) over the past 40 years. Methods. The WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring, the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) provided anonymized extracts of Vigibase covering the period 1968-2008. All countries in the programme were clustered according to their malaria control phase and income status. The number of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of anti-malarials was analyzed according to those clusters. Results: From 1968 to 2008, 21,312 ICSRs suspecting anti-malarials were received from 64 countries. Low-income countries, that are also malaria-endemic (categorized as priority 1 countries) submitted only 1.2% of the ICSRs. Only 60 out of 21,312 ICSRs were related to ACT, 51 of which were coming from four sub-Saharan African countries. Although very few ICSRs involved artemisinin-based compounds, many of the adverse events reported were potentially serious. Conclusions: This paper illustrates the low reporting of ADRs to anti-malarials in general and ACT in particular. Most reports were submitted by non-endemic and/or high-income countries. Given the current mix of large donor funding, the insufficient information on safety of these drugs, increasing availability of ACT and artemisinin-based monotherapies in public and private sector channels, associated potential for inappropriate use and finally a pipeline of more than 10 new novel anti-malarials in various stages of development, the presence of well functioning national pharmacovigilance systems is vital to ensure safe and responsible scale up of ACT deployment. Bringing together the competencies of national pharmacovigilance centres and various types of organizations in the NGO, academic and private sectors with global coordination to create short- and long-term solutions may help address the lag between rapidly growing ACT use and poor ADR reporting. © 2011 Kuemmerle et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source


Olsson S.,Collaborating Center for International Drug Monitoring | Pal S.N.,World Health Organization | Dodoo A.,University of Ghana
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology | Year: 2015

In the past 20 years, many low- and middle-income countries have created national pharmacovigilance (PV) systems and joined the WHO's global PV network. However, very few of them have fully functional systems. Scientific evidence on the local burden of medicine-related harm and their preventability is missing. Legislation and regulatory framework as well as financial support to build sustainable PV systems are needed. Public health programs need to integrate PV to monitor new vaccines and medicines introduced through these programs. Signal analysis should focus on high-burden preventable adverse drug problems. Increased involvement of healthcare professionals from public and private sectors, pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions and the public at large is necessary to assure a safe environment for drug therapy. WHO has a major role in supporting and coordinating these developments. © 2015 Informa UK, Ltd. Source


Giezen T.J.,University Utrecht | Mantel-Teeuwisse A.K.,University Utrecht | Meyboom R.H.B.,University Utrecht | Meyboom R.H.B.,Collaborating Center for International Drug Monitoring | And 3 more authors.
Drug Safety | Year: 2010

Background: Biologicals have specific characteristics, as compared with the small molecule drugs, and carry specific risks. Safety problems, for example infliximab and the risk for tuberculosis, have been identified via spontaneous reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, in general there is limited data on the nature of spontaneously reported suspected ADRs for biologicals. Objective: To map the safety profile of biologicals as compared with all other drugs. In addition, mechanistic classes of biologicals will be compared. Methods: Data was obtained from the ADR database (VigiBase) maintained by theWHOCollaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring. A disproportionality analysis was performed in which case reports for biologicals and all other drugs (the reference group), reported between January 1995 and December 2008, were selected. Vaccines were not included in the analysis. Suspected ADRs were classified according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) version 12.0 at the System Organ Class (SOC) level. Biologicals were classified into mechanistic classes: antibodies, cytokines, enzymes, growth factors, hormones (reference group), interferons, receptors and others/various. The safety profile of the biologicals versus all other drugs in the database and of the various mechanistic classes of biologicals was compared using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Results: 191 004 case reports containing 546 474 suspected ADRs were reported for 62 different biologicals, and 2 556 209 case reports containing 8 761 522 suspected ADRs were reported for all other drugs (the reference group). It was found that two-thirds of all suspected ADRs reported for biologicals were reported for five active substances: etanercept (20.3%), interferon-b-1a (15.6%), infliximab (11.6%), teriparatide (10.7%) and adalimumab (9.0%). Comparison of the safety profile of biologicals and the reference group showed that suspected ADRs for biologicals were more frequently reported in the SOCs Infections and infestations (PRR 4.5), Surgical and medical procedures (PRR 2.4) and Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (PRR 2.1), and less frequently reported in the SOCs Psychiatric disorders (PRR 0.4), Vascular disorders (PRR 0.4) and Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions (PRR 0.4). Regarding the differences in safety profile between various mechanistic classes of biologicals, compared with hormones (reference group), Infections and infestations were more frequently reported for receptors and antibodies. Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified were more frequently reported for antibodies, cytokines, interferons and receptors, and less frequently for enzymes as compared with the reference group. Conclusions: In VigiBase, five biologicals comprise two-thirds of the suspected ADRs reported for biologicals, which might distort the relation found between a specific biological and a specific adverse event in case of quantitative signal detection. Therefore the choice of reference group to be used in case of quantitative signal detection should be considered very carefully. This study confirmed that biologicals have a different safety profile compared with all other drugs in the database and, within the group of biologicals, differences exist between mechanistic classes. Infections are, for example, frequently reported for receptors and antibodies, which often have an immune compromising effect. Such predictable safety issues should be specifically studied by preregistration clinical trials and/or targeted pharmacovigilance. In addition, since not all adverse reactions can be predicted or detected during development, spontaneous reporting remains an important tool for the early detection of signals. © 2010 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved. Source


Isah A.O.,University of Benin | Pal S.N.,WHO | Olsson S.,Collaborating Center for International Drug Monitoring | Dodoo A.,University of Ghana | Bencheikh R.S.,Moroccan Poison and Pharmacovigilance Center
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety | Year: 2012

The thalidomide tragedy in the late 1950s and early 1960s served as a wakeup call and raised questions about the safety of medicinal products. The developed countries rose to the challenge putting in place systems to ensure the safety of medicines. However, this was not the case for low-resource settings because of prevailing factors inherent in them. This paper reviews some of these features and the current status of pharmacovigilance in Africa. The health systems in most of the 54 countries of Africa are essentially weak, lacking in basic infrastructure, personnel, equipment and facilities. The recent mass deployment of medicines to address diseases of public health significance in Africa poses additional challenges to the health system with notable safety concerns. Other safety issues of note include substandard and counterfeit medicines, medication errors and quality of medicinal products. The first national pharmacovigilance centres established in Africa with membership of the World Health Organization (WHO) international drug monitoring programme were in Morocco and South Africa in 1992. Of the 104 full member countries in the programme, there are now 24 African countries with a further nine countries as associate members. The pharmacovigilance systems operational in African countries are based essentially on spontaneous reporting facilitated by the introduction of the new tool Vigiflow. The individual case safety reports committed to the WHO global database (Vigibase) attest to the growth of pharmacovigilance in Africa with the number of reports rising from 2695 in 2000 to over 25,000 in 2010. There is need to engage the various identified challenges of the weak pharmacovigilance systems in the African setting and to focus efforts on how to provide resources, infrastructure and expertise. Raising the level of awareness among healthcare providers, developing training curricula for healthcare professionals, provisions for paediatric and geriatric pharmacovigilance, engaging the pharmaceutical industries as well as those for herbal remedies are of primary concern. © SAGE Publications 2011. Source


Pokladnikova J.,Charles University | Meyboom R.H.B.,Collaborating Center for International Drug Monitoring | Meyboom R.H.B.,University Utrecht | Meincke R.,Charles University | And 2 more authors.
Drug Safety | Year: 2016

Introduction: Herbal medicines are used worldwide and with an increasing popularity in Western countries. Although often perceived as ‘naturally safe’, herbals may cause severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs), with immediate allergic reactions being particularly life threatening. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse immediate allergy-like ADRs to herbals documented in VigiBase®, the WHO international pharmacovigilance database. Methods: The documentation of all suspected ADRs in association with herbal exposure reported to VigiBase® from 1969 to August 2014 was retrieved. Among all reports in which WHO-ART reaction terms were indicative of acute allergic reactions, those classified as ‘suspect’ with a documented causality assessment and latency time of ≤1 day were selected. For the most frequent specific herbal–ADR combinations, the information component (IC) as a measure of disproportionality based on Bayesian statistics was calculated. Results: We identified 757 reports out of 1039 ADRs. Products with mixed herbals (36.0 %) as well as those administered orally (63.2 %) were predominant. The most frequent reactions were urticaria and rash (49.2 %). Anaphylactic reactions accounted for 9.5 %. Disproportionally frequent reporting of mouth edema (IC = 1.81) and anaphylactic reactions (IC = 1.24) to Phleum pretense were noted. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that herbal medicines for oral use carry a risk of causing immediate allergy-like ADRs. Studies using the Vigibase® database can identify specific combinations of particular herbs and adverse reactions. Healthcare professionals and patients should be aware of these risks and report any serious adverse experiences. © 2016, Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Source

Discover hidden collaborations