Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment

Milano, Italy

Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment

Milano, Italy

Time filter

Source Type

Fogazzi G.B.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment | Garigali G.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
Clinica Chimica Acta | Year: 2017

We describe three ways to take digital images of urine sediment findings. Way 1 encompasses a digital camera permanently mounted on the microscope and connected with a computer equipped with a proprietary software to acquire, process and store the images. Way 2 is based on the use of inexpensive compact digital cameras, held by hands - or mounted on a tripod - close to one eyepiece of the microscope. Way 3 is based on the use of smartphones, held by hands close to one eyepiece of the microscope or connected to the microscope by an adapter. The procedures, advantages and limitations of each way are reported. © 2017


Hami M.,Mashhad University of Medical Sciences | Shahidi S.,Isfahan University of Medical Sciences | Nouri-Majalan N.,University of Yazd | Atapour A.,Isfahan University of Medical Sciences | Fogazzi G.B.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases | Year: 2013

Urinalysis is a mandatory diagnostic tool for the evaluation of patients with kidney diseases. A workshop on urinalysis was held for nephrologists in Isfahan, Iran, on October 11-12, 2012. After the presentation of the results of a survey of the nephrology centers of Iran on urine microscopy, the most important aspects of urinalysis were presented and discussed. These included the following: (1) urinalysis by dipstick, which provides results in a few seconds, is simple to use, has a low cost, and is used worldwide for screening purposes, in spite of some limitations; (2) measurement of proteinuria by 24-hour urine collection, which still represents the reference method in spite of limitations due to frequent over or under collection errors; (3) protein-creatinine ratio in a random urine sample, which is recommended by international guidelines as an alternative to the measurement of 24-hour protein excretion; (4) microalbuminuria, which is seen as a marker of systemic endothelial damage; and (5) the urinary sediment, which is underused even among nephrologists in spite of the relevant diagnostic information it can supply in a wide spectrum of kidney diseases.


Becker G.J.,Royal Melbourne Hospital | Garigali G.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment | Fogazzi G.B.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
American Journal of Kidney Diseases | Year: 2016

Urine microscopy is an important tool for the diagnosis and management of several conditions affecting the kidneys and urinary tract. In this review, we describe the automated instruments, based either on flow cytometry or digitized microscopy, that are currently in use in large clinical laboratories. These tools allow the examination of large numbers of samples in short periods. We also discuss manual urinary microscopy commonly performed by nephrologists, which we encourage. After discussing the advantages of phase contrast microscopy over bright field microscopy, we describe the advancements of urine microscopy in various clinical conditions. These include persistent isolated microscopic hematuria (which can be classified as glomerular or nonglomerular on the basis of urinary erythrocyte morphology), drug- and toxin-related cystalluria (which can be a clue for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury associated with intrarenal crystal precipitation), and some inherited conditions (eg, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency, which is associated with 2,8-dihydroxyadenine crystalluria, and Fabry disease, which is characterized by unique urinary lamellated fatty particles). Finally, we describe the utility of identifying "decoy cells" and atypical malignant cells, which can be easily done with phase contrast microscopy in unfixed samples. © 2016 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.


Spinelli D.,University of Milan | Consonni D.,Unita Operativa di Epidemiologia | Garigali G.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment | Fogazzi G.B.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
Clinica Chimica Acta | Year: 2013

Background: Casts are well known components of the urinary sediment. For most casts, the clinical associations are known and demonstrated, while for waxy casts they are totally unknown. Methods: Prospective study for the search and count of waxy casts in the urinary sediment of patients with different types of glomerular diseases. Results: Waxy casts were found in 39 out of 287 patients (13.6%), mostly in low number (1 to 9 out of 100 casts evaluated/sample). They were frequent in postinfectious glomerulonephritis and renal amyloidosis (5/9 patients, 44.5%, p=. 0.02 for each condition), while they were rare in membranous nephropathy (4/67 patients, 6.0%, 0.04) and absent in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (0/23 patients, p=. 0.05). Waxy casts were associated significantly with higher serum creatinine levels (. p<. 0.0001), with the presence of >. 1 leukocyte/HPF, granular casts and leukocytic casts (. p=. 0.001 to 0.008) and with higher numbers of erythrocytes, leukocytes, renal tubular epithelial cells, granular casts, epithelial casts, and leukocytic casts (. p<. 0.0001 to. =. 0.03). Conclusions: Waxy casts are uncommon and few in patients with glomerular diseases and are associated with impaired renal function and with several other structures of the urinary sediment. © 2013 The Authors.


Fogazzi G.B.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment | Secchiero S.,University of Padua | Garigali G.,University of Padua | Plebani M.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine | Year: 2014

Background: The few available External Quality Assessment (EQA) programs on urinary sediment rarely include an evaluation of clinical cases. The present paper provides a descriptive analysis of clinical cases included inthe Italian EQA program on urinary sediment. Methods: Ten cases were presented over a 5-year period (2007-2011). Each clinical case included a brief clinical history, some key laboratory data and four key urinary sediment particles obtained by phase contrast microscopy. The clinical diagnoses indicated by participants, chosen among four or five proposed, were evaluated only for those who had been able to correctly identify all four urinary sediment particles. The results of each survey were then evaluated, scored and commented on. Results: The numbers of participants for the 10 surveys ranged from 268 to 325. Throughout surveys, only 63.9% ± 17.0% (range 39.6%-88.7%) of participants achieved access to clinical diagnosis. Of these, 90.2% ± 8.5% (range 73.7%-98.1%) were able to indicate the correct diagnosis. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that once the correct identification of urinary sediment particles is obtained, most participants are able to associate urinary findings with the respective clinical conditions, thus establishing the correct diagnosis.


Secchiero S.,University of Padua | Fogazzi G.B.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment | Epifani M.,University of Padua | Garigali G.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment | Plebani M.,University of Padua
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine | Year: 2015

Background: Manual microscopy still represents the gold standard for urinary sediment (US) examination. We report the results obtained in the period 2012-2015 by the EQA Italian program on US, which today involves about 260 laboratories. Methods: The program includes four surveys per year. In two surveys, participants are asked to supply identification and clinical association of US particles. In two other surveys, they are asked to supply the diagnosis of clinical cases, presented with images, some key laboratory findings and a short clinical history. Sixty-six images of US particles (21 cells, 2 lipids, 21 casts, 10 crystals, 3 microorganisms, 15 contaminants) and seven clinical cases were presented. Results: The correct identification rate for each category of particles, in decreasing order, was: micro-organisms (mean±SD: 92.4%±4.5%), lipids (92.0%±1.8%), casts (82.8%±8.8%), crystals (79.4%±29.8%), cells (77.3%±13.5%), and contaminants (70.9%±22.2%). For 13 particles, a correct clinical association was indicated by 91.5%±11.7% of participants, while it was 52.7% for particles associated with urinary tract infection. For clinical cases, due to a high rate of particles misidentification, only 44.3%±10.1% of participants achieved access to clinical diagnosis, which was then correctly indicated by 92.5%±5.3% of them. Conclusions: The results of the EQA program confirm that, while some US particles are well known in terms of identification, clinical association and clinical meaning, others particles still are not, and this represents an important reason to encourage EQA programs on US. © 2015 by De Gruyter 2015.


Fogazzi G.B.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment | Pallotti F.,U.O. di Anatomia Patologica | Garigali G.,Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
Clinica Chimica Acta | Year: 2014

Background: Urinary cytology (Ucytol), which is performed in pathology laboratories on fixed and stained samples, represents the gold standard for the identification of atypical/malignant urothelial cells (A/MUC) due to urothelial carcinoma. In this paper we describe three patients in whom A/MUC, due to a bladder carcinoma, were identified with conventional urine sediment (Used) examination on unfixed and unstained samples. Methods: Included are urine samples prepared with conventional and standardized techniques as currently used in general clinical laboratories. Samples were examined with phase contrast microscopy. A/MUC were identified according to the criteria currently used for Ucytol. Results: A/MUC (i.e., cells with unusual and pleomorphic size and shape, increased nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, increased number of nuclei, irregular nuclear borders and irregular chromatin patterns, either isolated or in clusters) were identified in the urine of three patients, all of whom were found to have bladder carcinoma by cystoscopy. Conclusions: At variance with the common and widespread view, A/MUC can also be identified with conventional Used examination, even though Ucytol still represents the gold standard method. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.


PubMed | Royal Melbourne Hospital and Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
Type: Journal Article | Journal: American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation | Year: 2016

Urine microscopy is an important tool for the diagnosis and management of several conditions affecting the kidneys and urinary tract. In this review, we describe the automated instruments, based either on flow cytometry or digitized microscopy, that are currently in use in large clinical laboratories. These tools allow the examination of large numbers of samples in short periods. We also discuss manual urinary microscopy commonly performed by nephrologists, which we encourage. After discussing the advantages of phase contrast microscopy over bright field microscopy, we describe the advancements of urine microscopy in various clinical conditions. These include persistent isolated microscopic hematuria (which can be classified as glomerular or nonglomerular on the basis of urinary erythrocyte morphology), drug- and toxin-related cystalluria (which can be a clue for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury associated with intrarenal crystal precipitation), and some inherited conditions (eg, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase deficiency, which is associated with 2,8-dihydroxyadenine crystalluria, and Fabry disease, which is characterized by unique urinary lamellated fatty particles). Finally, we describe the utility of identifying decoy cells and atypical malignant cells, which can be easily done with phase contrast microscopy in unfixed samples.


PubMed | Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment
Type: | Journal: Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry | Year: 2017

We describe three ways to take digital images of urine sediment findings. Way 1 encompasses a digital camera permanently mounted on the microscope and connected with a computer equipped with a proprietary software to acquire, process and store the images. Way 2 is based on the use of inexpensive compact digital cameras, held by hands - or mounted on a tripod - close to one eyepiece of the microscope. Way 3 is based on the use of smartphones, held by hands close to one eyepiece of the microscope or connected to the microscope by an adapter. The procedures, advantages and limitations of each way are reported.

Loading Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment collaborators
Loading Clinical and Research Laboratory on Urinary Sediment collaborators