Chabriat H.,University Paris Diderot |
Chabriat H.,French Institute of Health and Medical Research |
Herve D.,University Paris Diderot |
Herve D.,French Institute of Health and Medical Research |
And 14 more authors.
Stroke | Year: 2016
Background and Purpose - Predictors of clinical worsening in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy remain unknown. This study aims to identify demographic, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging predictors of incident strokes, incident dementia, clinical deterioration, and death in patients with this genetically proven disease. Methods - Two hundred ninety subjects (mean age, 50.6±11.4 years) were assessed at baseline and followed up for 36 months. Incident clinical events were recorded, and clinical scores included the Mini Mental State Examination, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, modified Rankin Scale, and Barthel index. The number of lacunes and microbleeds, the volume of white-matter hyperintensities, and brain parenchymal fraction were assessed on baseline magnetic resonance imaging. Data were analyzed by ANCOVA, multivariable logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazard models. Results - Incident stroke occurred in 55 of 278 patients (19.8%). Moderate or severe disability developed in 19 of 210 (9%) nondisabled individuals, incident dementia in 49 of 231 (20%) nondemented subjects, and 4.8% of patients died. Active smoking, the number of lacunes, and brain parenchymal fraction independently predicted incident stroke during follow-up. Gait disturbance, dementia, and brain parenchymal fraction predicted progression toward moderate or severe disability. Active smoking, disability, and brain parenchymal fraction predicted incident dementia. Age was the only significant predictor of death. Conclusions - Clinical assessment and brain magnetic resonance imaging aid in predicting incident clinical events and clinical deterioration in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. There is a bidirectional relationship between dementia and moderate or severe disability in predicting each other's onset. Active smoking is a modifiable risk factor associated with clinical progression in Notch3 mutation carriers. © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc. Source
Duering M.,Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich |
Gesierich B.,Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich |
Seiler S.,Medical University of Graz |
Pirpamer L.,Medical University of Graz |
And 11 more authors.
Neurology | Year: 2014
Objective: Cerebral small vessel disease is the most common cause of vascular cognitive impairment and typically manifests with slowed processing speed. We investigated the impact of lesion location on processing speed in age-related small vessel disease. Methods: A total of 584 community-dwelling elderly underwent brainMRI followed by segmentation of white matter hyperintensities. Processing speed was determined by the timed measure of the Trail Making Test part B. The impact of the location of white matter hyperintensities was assessed by voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and graph-based statistical models on regional lesion volumes in major white matter tracts. Results: Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping identified multiple voxel clusters where the presence of white matter hyperintensities was associated with slower performance on the TrailMaking Test part B. Clusterswere located bilaterally in the forcepsminor and anterior thalamic radiation. Region of interest- based Bayesian network analyses on lesion volumeswithinmajor whitematter tracts depicted the same tracts as direct predictors for an impaired Trail Making Test part B performance. Conclusions: Our findings highlight damage to frontal interhemispheric and thalamic projection fiber tracts harboring frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits as a predictor for processing speed performance in age-related small vessel disease. © 2014 American Academy of Neurology. Source
Parienti J.-J.,Caen University Hospital Center |
Mongardon N.,University of Caen Lower Normandy |
Megarbane B.,CHU Lariboisiere |
Mira J.-P.,University of Caen Lower Normandy |
And 9 more authors.
New England Journal of Medicine | Year: 2015
Background: Three anatomical sites are commonly used to insert central venous catheters, but insertion at each site has the potential for major complications. Methods: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned nontunneled central venous catheterization in patients in the adult intensive care unit (ICU) to the subclavian, jugular, or femoral vein (in a 1:1:1 ratio if all three insertion sites were suitable [threechoice scheme] and in a 1:1 ratio if two sites were suitable [two-choice scheme]). The primary outcome measure was a composite of catheter-related bloodstream infection and symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis. Results: A total of 3471 catheters were inserted in 3027 patients. In the three-choice comparison, there were 8, 20, and 22 primary outcome events in the subclavian, jugular, and femoral groups, respectively (1.5, 3.6, and 4.6 per 1000 catheter-days; P = 0.02). In pairwise comparisons, the risk of the primary outcome was significantly higher in the femoral group than in the subclavian group (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 7.8; P = 0.003) and in the jugular group than in the subclavian group (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.3; P = 0.04), whereas the risk in the femoral group was similar to that in the jugular group (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.1; P = 0.30). In the three-choice comparison, pneumothorax requiring chest-tube insertion occurred in association with 13 (1.5%) of the subclavian-vein insertions and 4 (0.5%) of the jugular-vein insertions. Conclusions: In this trial, subclavian-vein catheterization was associated with a lower risk of bloodstream infection and symptomatic thrombosis and a higher risk of pneumothorax than jugular-vein or femoral-vein catheterization. Copyright © 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society. Source
Mejjad O.,Clinique de lEurope |
Serrie A.,CHU Lariboisiere |
Ganry H.,Laboratoires Grunenthal
Current Medical Research and Opinion | Year: 2011
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the paracetamol-tramadol combination (PTC) in treating moderate-to-severe pain, in patients aged 65 years and over within general practitioner (GP) practice centers. Research design and methods: This was an observational, non-interventional, longitudinal, multicenter, open, non-comparative, prospective study. This intermediary analysis was of patients recruited before the French Health Authority confirmation (25th June, 2009) of the EMEA decision to withdraw all analgesics containing dextropropoxyphen. Trial registration information: This study has been submitted for approval to the CNIL and French Medical Council (CNOM) only. Results: A total of 2663 patients aged 65 years or over were assessed 1 month after inclusion in the study. PTC was prescribed as first-line treatment in 30% of patients and, in the other cases, after failed or inadequate efficacy (69.8%), and/or as a result of safety problems (7.8%) with at least one other analgesic. During the month of the study period 14.7% of patients received an additional rescue analgesic. The study confirmed the efficacy of PTC with regard to pain intensity (-3.1 points reduction of pain scored 6.1 points on inclusion), pain relief (64.8% of patients experienced significant pain relief), patient satisfaction (90.5% of patients satisfied or completely satisfied) and clinical global impression evaluated by the patient (78.7% much or very much improved), regardless of the pain etiologies or duration of the underlying pathology. PTC was well-tolerated in this patient group, who had a mean age of 73.6 ± 6.6 years. A total of 119 patients (4.5%) reported at least one adverse event (AE). All were known and predictable AEs. This percentage is comparable to that found under similar conditions in patients of all ages (4.2%). Conclusions: PTC, due to the complementary action of its two analgesics, is effective in treating the different types of pain in a GP's practice setting and is well-tolerated, even in an elderly population. Study limitations include all those inherent to non-interventional and open-label observations. © 2011 Informa UK Ltd. Source
Arnaud L.,systemIC |
Arnaud L.,French Institute of Health and Medical Research |
Hervier B.,systemIC |
Hervier B.,University Pierre and Marie Curie |
And 27 more authors.
Blood | Year: 2011
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare form of non-Langerhans histiocytosis, with noncodified therapeutic management and high mortality. No treatment has yet been shown to improve survival in these patients. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational cohort study to assess whether extraskeletal manifestations and interferon-α treatment would influence survival in a large cohort of ECD patients. To achieve this goal, we thoroughly analyzed the clinical presentation of 53 patients with biopsyproven ECD, and we performed a survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard model. Fifty-three patients (39 men and 14 women) with biopsy-proven ECD were followed up between November 1981 and November 2010. Forty-six patients (87%) received interferon-α and/or PEGylated interferon-α. Multivariate survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard model revealed that central nervous system involvement was an independent predictor of death (hazard ratio = 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-5.52; P = .006) in our cohort. Conversely, treatment with interferon-α was identified as an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio = 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.70; P = .006). Although definitive confirmation would require a randomized controlled trial, these results suggest that interferon-α improves survival in ECD patients. This may be seen as a significant advance, as it is the first time a treatment is shown to improve survival in this multisystemic disease with high mortality. © 2011 by The American Society of Hematology. Source