Mackey E.,Childrens National Health Systems |
Schweitzer A.,Center for Translational Science |
Schweitzer A.,University of Maryland University College |
Hurtado M.E.,MedStar Research Institute |
And 5 more authors.
Journal of American College Health | Year: 2015
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an e-mail-delivered program to promote nutrition and physical activity in African American college students. Participants: Forty-seven students (76% female, aged 18-20 years). Methods: Students participated in a 24-week randomized controlled trial, receiving either general health information or the intervention focused on diet and physical activity. Results: At baseline, 80.9% and 76.0% of participants reported interest in improving diet and physical activity, respectively. Participants evidenced poor nutrition behaviors and 46% were overweight or obese. At 24 weeks, most participants (70% control, 84% intervention) were "somewhat" or "very" satisfied with the program. The program was feasible to administrate, with the exception of measurement of physical activity using accelerometers. Conclusions: An innovative e-mail-delivered program promoting positive health behaviors appears to be feasible and acceptable in African American college students. Further research is needed to evaluate program efficacy in this population, including prevention of excess weight gain. © 2015 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Source
Pestieau S.R.,Sedation and Perioperative Medicine |
Finkel J.C.,Sedation and Perioperative Medicine |
Finkel J.C.,Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation |
Junqueira M.M.,Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation |
And 5 more authors.
Paediatric Anaesthesia | Year: 2014
Background Opioid consumption after posterior spinal fusion is known to be high and often exceeds those reported in other major surgical procedures. A number of clinical trials provide evidence that the perioperative use of subanesthetic doses of ketamine reduces pain and opioid requirements in some surgical procedures, but the effect of prolonged perioperative low-dose ketamine infusion in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for pediatric scoliosis surgery is unknown. Objective To test the hypothesis that a 72-h perioperative low-dose ketamine infusion would decrease opioid use in pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Methods In a double-blind prospective controlled trial, patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis were randomized to receive perioperative low-dose ketamine or placebo control. Patients received general anesthesia, intraoperative remifentanil, and morphine patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively. Daily opioid consumption, self-reported pain scores, and sedation scores were measured. Results Fifty-four patients were enrolled and 50 completed the study. Contrary to our hypothesis, ketamine- and control-treated patients had similar postoperative opioid use, pain scores, and sedation scores measurements. In contrast, ketamine-treated patients required less intraoperative remifentanil compared with control (mean 2.9 mg vs. 4 mg, P = 0.0415). Number of vertebrae instrumented, time between end-of-surgery and 24 h assessment, or remifentanil doses did not impact on postoperative opioid use. Over 96-h postoperatively, morphine-equivalent consumption was lower (-0.40, P = 0.006) and sedation score was higher (0.47, P = 0.0211) in male patients, compared with female patients. Conclusions These findings do not support the use of perioperative low-dose ketamine to decrease opioid use in children with scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Source
Hill D.L.,Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia |
Miller V.,Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia |
Walter J.K.,Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia |
Carroll K.W.,Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia |
And 5 more authors.
BMC Palliative Care | Year: 2014
Background: Parents of seriously ill children participate in making difficult medical decisions for their child. In some cases, parents face situations where their initial goals, such as curing the condition, may have become exceedingly unlikely. While some parents continue to pursue these goals, others relinquish their initial goals and generate new goals such as maintaining the child's quality of life. We call this process of transitioning from one set of goals to another regoaling. Discussion. Regoaling involves factors that either promote or inhibit the regoaling process, including disengagement from goals, reengagement in new goals, positive and negative affect, and hopeful thinking. We examine these factors in the context of parental decision making for a seriously ill child, presenting a dynamic conceptual model of regoaling. This model highlights four research questions that will be empirically tested in an ongoing longitudinal study of medical decision making among parents of children with serious illness. Additionally, we consider potential clinical implications of regoaling for the practice of pediatric palliative care. Summary. The psychosocial model of regoaling by parents of children with a serious illness predicts that parents who experience both positive and negative affect and hopeful patterns of thought will be more likely to relinquish one set of goals and pursue a new set of goals. A greater understanding of how parents undergo this transition may enable clinicians to better support them through this difficult process. © 2014 Hill et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source
Winter A.L.,Baylor College of Medicine |
Conklin H.M.,St Jude Childrens Research Hospital |
Tyc V.L.,St Jude Childrens Research Hospital |
Stancel H.,Baylor College of Medicine |
And 4 more authors.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology | Year: 2014
Background: Survivors of pediatric brain tumors (BT) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk for neurocognitive late effects related to executive function. Procedure: Survivors of BT (48) and ALL (50) completed neurocognitive assessment. Executive function was compared to estimated IQ and population norms by diagnostic group. Results: Both BT and ALL demonstrated relative executive function weaknesses. As a group, BT survivors demonstrated weaker executive functioning than expected for age. Those BT survivors with deficits exhibited a profile suggestive of global executive dysfunction, while affected ALL survivors tended to demonstrate specific rapid naming deficits. Conclusion: Findings suggest that pediatric BT and ALL survivors may exhibit different profiles of executive function late effects, which may necessitate distinct intervention plans. © 2014 Taylor & Francis. Source
Pentz R.D.,Winship Cancer Institute |
Alderfer M.A.,Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia |
Pelletier W.,Transplant Program |
Stegenga K.,Childrens Mercy Hospital |
And 5 more authors.
Pediatrics | Year: 2014
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2010, the Bioethics Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics issued recommendations that pediatric hematopoietic stem cell donors should have an independent advocate. Formulating appropriate guidelines is hindered by the lack of prospective empirical evidence from families about the experience of siblings during typing and donation. Our aim was to provide these data. METHODS: Families with a child scheduled to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant were recruited. All family members, including children aged 9 to 22 years, were eligible. Qualitative interviews were conducted within 3 time periods: pretransplant, 6 to 8, and 9 to 11 months posttransplant. Quantitative scales assessing decision satisfaction and regret were administered at time 2. RESULTS: Thirty-three families were interviewed. Of the 119 family members, 76% perceived there was no choice in the decision to HLA-type siblings; 77% perceived no choice in sibling donation; 86% had no concerns about typing other than needle sticks; and 64% had no concerns about donation. Common concerns raised were dislike of needle sticks (19%), stress before typing results (14%), and fear of donation (15%). Posttransplantation, 33% of donors wished they had been given more information; 56% of donors stated they benefited from donation. Only 1 donor expressed regret posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Most family members did not view sibling typing and donation as a choice, were positive about the experience, and did not express regrets. We recommend education for all siblings before typing, comprehensive education for the donor by a health care provider pretransplant, and systematic donor follow-up after transplantation. Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Source