News Article | May 16, 2017
The global herbicide market was $23.97 billion in 2016 and is estimated to reach $34.10 billion by 2022, at a CAGR of 6.05% for the forecasted period. Gradual transformation in usage from selective herbicide to non-selective herbicide will be a key trend during the period. Glyphosate segment is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.69% during the period, second in terms of volume. Within types of herbicides, bio-herbicide would grow at the fastest rate reflecting 23.5% CAGR during forecast period Latin America and Asia-Pacific are the top two consumers of herbicides, together accounted for more than half of the market share in 2016. North America has become a saturated market and as a result, the growth is slow, while APAC is prone to be the fastest growing market. Increasing demand from end applications will drive demand for Glyphosate-based herbicides. Added to this, agriculture growing rapidly in Asia-Pacific and Latin America will increase demand for such herbicides. Countries like US, China, Japan and Taiwan are having the lead in terms of per capita usage of pesticide market in comparison to low consumption countries like India, Greece and others. However, food security need and good reforms will drive the market in these countries. Factors like high ecological and concerns over health along with the latest scientific developments drive the global herbicides industry's growth towards new, safe, and effective products. Demand for food grain products and shrinking arable land are as well driving the market. Companies are investing in R&D to bring in innovative products that adhere to government norms producing better results. On the other hand, regulatory authorities such as EPA have stringent laws related to curbing pesticide use for damaging environment and increasing consumer awareness about pesticide consumption, is hindering the market demand. Constraints include low per capita usage in several countries, shrinking farm lands, and rapidly increasing research and development costs are limiting the market. Added to this, several highly toxic pesticides are either banned or in process of being phased out, or are under constant scrutiny by the regulatory agencies. Key Topics Covered: 1. Research Methodology 2. Market Overview 3. Market Dynamics 4. Herbicide Market Segmentation, Forecasts and Trends - by Revenue 5. By Product type Glyphosate Atrazine Acetochlor 2,4-D Paraquat Bio-herbicide Others Mode of Action Selective Non-Selective 6. By Crop Type Cereals and Grains Oilseeds and Pulses Fruits and Vegetables Cotton 7. By Region 8. Global Vendor Market Share Analysis 9. Competitive Intelligence - Company Profiles BASF Bayer Ag DOW Agriscience LLC Syngenta Cheminova A/S Adama Agricultural Solutions Ltd FMC Corporation Nufarm Ltd Dupont Monsanto Ag Chemical Drexel Chemical Co. Others 10. Investment Scenario For more information about this report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/vtszm5/global_herbicide To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-3410-billion-herbicide-market-2022---research-and-markets-300458389.html
News Article | May 12, 2017
This report studies Oil Seed Crop Protection in Global market, especially in North America, China, Europe, Southeast Asia, Japan and India, with production, revenue, consumption, import and export in these regions, from 2012 to 2016, and forecast to 2022. This report focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Adama Agricultural Solutions American Vanguard Corporation Arysta LifeScience BASF Bayer Bioworks Cheminova Chemtura AgroSolutions Dow DuPont FMC Corporation IsAgro Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha Marrone Bio Innovations Monsanto Natural Industries -Novozymes Nufarm Ltd Syngenta International Valent Biosciences Corp By types, the market can be split into Synthetic Pesticides Biopesticides By Application, the market can be split into Sunflower Rape Sesame Groundnut Linseed Safflower Others By Regions, this report covers (we can add the regions/countries as you want) North America China Europe Southeast Asia Japan India Global Oil Seed Crop Protection Market Professional Survey Report 2017 1 Industry Overview of Oil Seed Crop Protection 1.1 Definition and Specifications of Oil Seed Crop Protection 1.1.1 Definition of Oil Seed Crop Protection 1.1.2 Specifications of Oil Seed Crop Protection 1.2 Classification of Oil Seed Crop Protection 1.2.1 Synthetic Pesticides 1.2.2 Biopesticides 1.3 Applications of Oil Seed Crop Protection 1.3.1 Sunflower 1.3.2 Rape 1.3.3 Sesame 1.3.4 Groundnut 1.3.5 Linseed 1.3.6 Safflower 1.3.7 Others 1.4 Market Segment by Regions 1.4.1 North America 1.4.2 China 1.4.3 Europe 1.4.4 Southeast Asia 1.4.5 Japan 1.4.6 India 2 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis of Oil Seed Crop Protection 2.1 Raw Material and Suppliers 2.2 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis of Oil Seed Crop Protection 2.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Oil Seed Crop Protection 2.4 Industry Chain Structure of Oil Seed Crop Protection 8 Major Manufacturers Analysis of Oil Seed Crop Protection 8.1 Adama Agricultural Solutions 8.1.1 Company Profile 8.1.2 Product Picture and Specifications 18.104.22.168 Product A 22.214.171.124 Product B 8.1.3 Adama Agricultural Solutions 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.1.4 Adama Agricultural Solutions 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.2 American Vanguard Corporation 8.2.1 Company Profile 8.2.2 Product Picture and Specifications 126.96.36.199 Product A 188.8.131.52 Product B 8.2.3 American Vanguard Corporation 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.2.4 American Vanguard Corporation 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.3 Arysta LifeScience 8.3.1 Company Profile 8.3.2 Product Picture and Specifications 184.108.40.206 Product A 220.127.116.11 Product B 8.3.3 Arysta LifeScience 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.3.4 Arysta LifeScience 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.4 BASF 8.4.1 Company Profile 8.4.2 Product Picture and Specifications 18.104.22.168 Product A 22.214.171.124 Product B 8.4.3 BASF 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.4.4 BASF 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.5 Bayer 8.5.1 Company Profile 8.5.2 Product Picture and Specifications 126.96.36.199 Product A 188.8.131.52 Product B 8.5.3 Bayer 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.5.4 Bayer 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.6 Bioworks 8.6.1 Company Profile 8.6.2 Product Picture and Specifications 184.108.40.206 Product A 220.127.116.11 Product B 8.6.3 Bioworks 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.6.4 Bioworks 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.7 Cheminova 8.7.1 Company Profile 8.7.2 Product Picture and Specifications 18.104.22.168 Product A 22.214.171.124 Product B 8.7.3 Cheminova 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.7.4 Cheminova 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.8 Chemtura AgroSolutions 8.8.1 Company Profile 8.8.2 Product Picture and Specifications 126.96.36.199 Product A 188.8.131.52 Product B 8.8.3 Chemtura AgroSolutions 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.8.4 Chemtura AgroSolutions 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.9 Dow 8.9.1 Company Profile 8.9.2 Product Picture and Specifications 184.108.40.206 Product A 220.127.116.11 Product B 8.9.3 Dow 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.9.4 Dow 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.10 DuPont 8.10.1 Company Profile 8.10.2 Product Picture and Specifications 18.104.22.168 Product A 22.214.171.124 Product B 8.10.3 DuPont 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Sales, Ex-factory Price, Revenue, Gross Margin Analysis 8.10.4 DuPont 2016 Oil Seed Crop Protection Business Region Distribution Analysis 8.11 FMC Corporation 8.12 IsAgro 8.13 Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha 8.14 Marrone Bio Innovations 8.15 Monsanto 8.16 Natural Industries -Novozymes 8.17 Nufarm Ltd 8.18 Syngenta International 8.19 Valent Biosciences Corp For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/1270936-global-oil-seed-crop-protection-market-professional-survey-report-2017
Agency: European Commission | Branch: FP7 | Program: CP-TP | Phase: KBBE.2013.3.3-04 | Award Amount: 11.20M | Year: 2013
The INDOX proposal on industrial oxidoreductases aims to provide relevant industrial case stories to demonstrate the efficacy of optimized biocatalysts on targeted reactions, and to establish the processes scalability, sustainability and cost-efficiency versus chemical conversion processes. The chemical industry (specialties excluded) is not yet embracing enzymatic oxidation reactions to a significant extent primarily due to lack of biocatalysts with the required selectivity, availability and compatibility with the rigorous process conditions. Selected industrial oxidation and oxyfunctionalization target reactions form the basis for the INDOX screening and optimization of new biocatalysts, including: i) Intermediates for agrochemicals/APIs; ii) Polymer precursors and functionalized polymers; and iii) Intermediates for dye-stuffs. The project flow comprises: i) Recovery of selective biocatalysts from the groups of heme-peroxidases/peroxygenases, flavo-oxidases and copper-oxidoreductases from fungal genomes and other sources; ii) Improvement of their oxidative activity and stability by protein engineering (using rational design, directed evolution and hybrid approaches combined with computational calculations) to fulfill the operational and catalytic conditions required by the chemical industry; and iii) Optimization of reaction conditions and reactor configurations (including immobilization technologies and new enzymatic cascade reactions). Finally the cost efficiency compared to chemical processing will be evaluated. The INDOX approach is supported by a highly-specialized consortium of SMEs, large companies and research/academic institutions. Production of the new optimized biocatalysts and their introduction into the chemical market will take advantage from the participation of the world-leading company in the sector of industrial enzymes, together with several chemical companies willing to implement the new medium- and large-scale biotransformation processes.
Cheminova | Date: 2014-05-27
Process for preparing 4,6-bis(aryloxy)pyrimidine derivatives A process is provided for preparing 4,6-bis(aryloxy)pyrimidine derivatives. The process is conducted in water as reaction medium and catalyzed by one or more tertiary-amine catalyst(s). It has been found that a water based reaction substantially free of organic solvents can be carried out providing excellent yields by the addition of one or more tertiary-amine catalysts to the reaction medium. This provides a clean reaction and produces the desired product in high yields.
Cheminova | Date: 2013-01-16
The present invention provides herbicidal, aqueous suspension concentrate compositions comprising certain active compounds, adjuvants and a structuring agent selected among smectite clays suitable for controlling weeds in crops of cultivated plants.
Cheminova | Date: 2013-11-27
The present invention relates to herbicidal aqueous compositions comprising a combination of at least one aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid herbicide and at least one triazolopyrimidine herbicide in addition to at least one C6-C14 fatty acid ester solvent, suitable for selectively controlling weeds in crops of cultivated plants. The compositions show high stability for the aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid herbicide as well as the triazolopyrimidine herbicide.
Cheminova | Date: 2014-06-13
The present invention relates to a novel process for producing of 2,3-dichloro-5-(trichloromethyl)pyridine by using PCl as chlorinating agent at elevated temperature and pressure.
Cheminova | Date: 2014-06-19
Presented is a composition comprising pethoxamidand picloram. The composition exerts asynergistical effect.
Cheminova | Date: 2012-02-29
Liquid neonicotinyl formulations comprising DMSO as solvent and an emulgator system selected among compounds having an ethylenglycol-propylenglycol co-polymeric chain as well as mixtures thereof.
Cheminova | Date: 2014-07-11
This invention relates to the use of flutriafol for controlling or preventing pathogenic damage caused by the fungi Macrophomina phaseolina in a plant propagation material, a plant, part of a plant and/or plant organ that grow or grows at a later point in time. The use comprises applying a composition of flutriafol on the plant, part of the plant, plant organ, plant propagation material or a surrounding area.