Fox S.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Cashell A.,Parkinsons Association of Ireland |
Kernohan W.G.,University of Ulster |
Lynch M.,Irish Hospice Foundation |
And 4 more authors.
BMC Palliative Care | Year: 2016
Background: An integrated palliative care approach is recommended in all life-limiting diseases, including Parkinson's disease (PD). However research shows that people with PD have unmet palliative care needs. The study aimed to explore multidisciplinary healthcare workers' (HCWs) views on palliative care for people with PD, identifying perceived barriers and facilitators. Methods: A qualitative design was used; data was analysed using Thematic Analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 HCWs, working either with people with PD or in a palliative care setting in Ireland. Results: A number of perceived barriers were evident helping to account for the previously reported unmet palliative care needs in PD. A lack of education about PD and palliative care meant that HCWs were unsure of the appropriateness of referral, and patients and carers weren't equipped with information to seek palliative care. A lack of communication between PD and palliative care specialists was seen to impede collaboration between the disciplines. Uncertainty about the timing of palliative care meant that it was often not introduced until a crisis point, despite the recognised need for early planning due to increased prevalence of dementia. Conclusions: Most HCWs recognised a need for palliative care for people with PD; however several barriers to implementing a palliative care approach in this population need to be addressed. Implications for clinical practice and policy include the need for an integrated model of care, and education for all HCWs, patients, carers, and the public on both the nature of advanced PD, and the potential of palliative care in support of patients and their family members. © 2016 Fox et al. Source
Kuhn E.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Du X.,University of Cambridge |
Mcgrath K.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Coveney S.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
And 13 more authors.
PLoS ONE | Year: 2014
Background: Delirium is increasingly considered to be an important determinant of trajectories of cognitive decline. Therefore, analyses of existing cohort studies measuring cognitive outcomes could benefit from methods to ascertain a retrospective delirium diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate such a method for delirium detection using routine medical records in UK and Ireland. Methods: A point prevalence study of delirium provided the reference-standard ratings for delirium diagnosis. Blinded to study results, clinical vignettes were compiled from participants' medical records in a standardised manner, describing any relevant delirium symptoms recorded in the whole case record for the period leading up to case-ascertainment. An expert panel rated each vignette as unlikely, possible, or probable delirium and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results: From 95 case records, 424 vignettes were abstracted by 5 trained clinicians. There were 29 delirium cases according to the reference standard. Median age of subjects was 76.6 years (interquartile range 54.6 to 82.5). Against the original study DSM-IV diagnosis, the chart abstraction method gave a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 7.8 (95% CI 5.7-12.0) and the negative LR of 0.45 (95% CI 0.40-0.47) for probable delirium (sensitivity 0.58 (95% CI 0.53-0.62); specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95); AUC 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.89)). The method diagnosed possible delirium with positive LR 3.5 (95% CI 2.9-4.3) and negative LR 0.15 (95% CI 0.11-0.21) (sensitivity 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.91); specificity 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.79); AUC 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.89)). Conclusions: This chart abstraction method can retrospectively diagnose delirium in hospitalised patients with good accuracy. This has potential for retrospectively identifying delirium in cohort studies where routine medical records are available. This example of record linkage between hospitalisations and epidemiological data may lead to further insights into the inter-relationship between acute illness, as an exposure, for a range of chronic health outcomes. © 2014 Kuhn et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Source
Fitzgerald J.,University of Limerick |
O'Regan N.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Adamis D.,University of Limerick |
Timmons S.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
And 6 more authors.
International Psychogeriatrics | Year: 2016
Background: Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric syndrome that includes clinical subtypes identified by the Delirium Motor Subtyping Scale (DMSS). We explored the concordance between the DMSS and an abbreviated 4-item version in elderly medical inpatients. Methods: Elderly general medical admissions (n = 145) were assessed for delirium using the Revised Delirium Rating scale (DRS-R98). Clinical subtype was assessed with the DMSS (which includes the four items included in the DMSS-4). Motor subtypes were generated for all patient assessments using both versions of the scale. The concordance of the original and abbreviated DMSS was examined. Results: The agreement between the DMSS and DMSS-4 was high, both at initial and subsequent assessments (κ range 0.75-0.91). Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for all three raters for the DMSS was high (0.70) and for DMSS-4 was moderate (0.59). Analysis of the agreement between raters for individual DMSS items found higher concordance in respect of hypoactive features compared to hyperactive. Conclusions: The DMSS-4 allows for rapid assessment of clinical subtype in delirium and has high concordance with the longer and well-validated DMSS, including over longitudinal assessment. There is good inter-rater reliability between medical and nursing staff. More consistent clinical subtyping can facilitate better delirium management and more focused research effort. © International Psychogeriatric Association 2015. Source
Meagher D.,University of Limerick |
O'Regan N.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Ryan D.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Connolly W.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
And 13 more authors.
British Journal of Psychiatry | Year: 2014
Background: The frequency of full syndromal and subsyndromal delirium is understudied. Aims: We conducted a point prevalence study in a general hospital. Method: Possible delirium identified by testing for inattention was evaluated regarding delirium status (full/subsyndromal delirium) using categorical (Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), DSM-IV) and dimensional (Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) scores) methods. Results: In total 162 of 311 patients (52%) screened positive for inattention. Delirium was diagnosed in 55 patients (17.7%) using DSM-IV, 52 (16.7% ) using CAM and 58 (18.6%) using DRS-R98512 with concordance for 38 (12.2%) individuals. Subsyndromal delirium was identified in 24 patients (7.7%) using a DRS-R98 score of 7-11 and 41 (13.2%) using 2/4 CAM criteria. Subsyndromal delirium with inattention (v. without) had greater disturbance of multiple delirium symptoms. Conclusions: The point prevalence of delirium and subsyndromal delirium was 25%. There was modest concordance between DRS-R98, DSM-IV and CAM delirium diagnoses. Inattention should be central to subsyndromal delirium definitions. Source
O'Caoimh R.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Gao Y.,Center for Gerontology and Rehabilitation |
Gallagher P.F.,University College Cork |
Eustace J.,University College Cork |
And 2 more authors.
Age and Ageing | Year: 2013
Introduction: the Qmci is a sensitive and specific test to differentiate between normal cognition (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the subtests of the Qmci to determine which best discriminated NC, MCI and dementia.Objective: the objective was to determine the contribution each subtest of the Qmci makes, to its sensitivity and specificity in differentiating MCI from NC and dementia, to refine and shorten the instrument.Methods: existing data from our previous study of 965 subjects, testing the Qmci, was analysed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Qmci subtests.Results: all the subtests of the Qmci differentiated MCI from NC. Logical memory (LM) performed the best (area under the receiver operating curve of 0.80), registration the worst, (0.56). LM and verbal fluency had the largest median differences (expressed as percentage of total score) between MCI and NC, 20 and 25%, respectively. Other subtests did not have clinically useful differences. LM was best at differentiating MCI from NC, irrespective of age or educational status.Conclusion: the Qmci incorporates several important cognitive domains making it useful across the spectrum of cognitive impairment. LM is the best performing subtest for differentiating MCI from NC. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. Source