Time filter

Source Type

Lee J.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Lee J.,McMaster University | Walus A.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Billing R.,Hennepin Regions Psychiatry Residency Program | And 3 more authors.
Postgraduate Medical Journal | Year: 2016

Background Distributed medical education (DME) programmes, in which training occurs in underserviced areas, have been established as a strategy to increase recruitment and retention of new physicians following graduation to these areas. Little is known about what makes physicians remain in the area in which they train. Objectives To explore the factors that contributed to family physician's decisions to practice in an underserviced area following graduation from a DME programme. Methods Semistructured inperson interviews were conducted with 19 family physicians who graduated from a DME residency training programme. Programme records were reviewed to identify practice location of DME programme graduates. Results Of the 32 graduates to date from this DME programme, 66% (N=21) and all of the interview participants established their practices in this region after completing their residency training. Five key themes were identified from the interview analysis as impacting physicians' decisions to establish their practice in an underserviced area following graduation: familial ties to the region, practice opportunities, positive clerkship and residency experiences, established relationships with specialists and services in the area and lifestyle opportunities afforded by the location. Conclusions This study suggests that DME programmes can be an effective strategy for equalising the distribution of family physicians and highlights the ways in which these programmes can facilitate recruitment and retention in underserviced areas, including being responsive to residents' personal preferences and objectives for learning and shaping their residency experiences to meet to these objectives. © 2016 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine.

Lee L.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Lee L.,McMaster University | Heckman G.,Health Science University | McKelvie R.,McMaster University | And 4 more authors.
Canadian Family Physician | Year: 2015

Objective To explore the barriers to and facilitators of adapting and expanding a primary care memory clinic model to integrate care of additional complex chronic geriatric conditions (heart failure, falls, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and frailty) into care processes with the goal of improving outcomes for seniors. Design Mixed-methods study using quantitative (questionnaires) and qualitative (interviews) methods. Setting Ontario. Participants Family physicians currently working in primary care memory clinic teams and supporting geriatric specialists. Methods Family physicians currently working in memory clinic teams (n = 29) and supporting geriatric specialists (n = 9) were recruited as survey participants. Interviews were conducted with memory clinic lead physicians (n = 16). Statistical analysis was done to assess differences between family physician ratings and geriatric specialist ratings related to the capacity for managing complex chronic geriatric conditions, the role of interprofessional collaboration within primary care, and funding and staffing to support geriatric care. Results from both study methods were compared to identify common findings. Main findings Results indicate overall support for expanding the memory clinic model to integrate care for other complex conditions. However, the current primary care structure is challenged to support optimal management of patients with multiple comorbidities, particularly as related to limited funding and staffing resources. Structured training, interprofessional teams, and an active role of geriatric specialists within primary care were identified as important facilitators. Conclusion The memory clinic model, as applied to other complex chronic geriatric conditions, has the potential to build capacity for high-quality primary care, improve health outcomes, promote efficient use of health care resources, and reduce health care costs.

Lee J.,McMaster University | Lee J.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Alfieri M.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Alfieri M.,McMaster University | And 4 more authors.
Canadian Family Physician | Year: 2011

Objective: To describe key determinants for residents' selection of a new community-based, interprofessional site for their family medicine training, and to evaluate residents' satisfaction with their programs. Design: Combined qualitative and quantitative methods using in-depth interviews and a survey. Setting: McMaster University, including the new site of the Centre for Family Medicine in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ont, and a long-established site in Hamilton, Ont. Participants: Eleven first-year and second-year family medicine residents from the Kitchener-Waterloo site participated in in-depth interviews. Forty-four first-year and second-year family medicine residents completed the survey, 22 in Kitchener-Waterloo and 22 in Hamilton. Methods: Kitchener-Waterloo residents participated in in-depth interviews during their residency programs in 2008 to 2009 using a semistructured format to explore their choice of site and the effect of an interprofessional environment on their education. Common themes were established using qualitative analysis techniques; based on these themes, a survey was developed and distributed to residents from both sites to further explore factors influencing site selection, satisfaction, and effects of interprofessional education. Main findings: Residents identified several reasons for selecting a new community-based, interprofessional family medicine residency program. Reasons included preference for the location and opportunities to learn in an interprofessional teaching environment. A less hierarchical structure and greater opportunities for one-on-one teaching also influenced their choices. Perception of poor communication from the well established site was identified as a challenge. Residents at both sites indicated similarly high levels of program satisfaction. Conclusion: Residents selected the new community-based family medicine site for reasons of geographic location and the potential for clinical learning experiences and interprofessional education. High program satisfaction was achieved at both the new and well established sites. Family medicine residency programs developing community-based networks might consider and encourage the positive influence of interprofessional care and education. Good communication between distributed sites remains a challenge.

McMillan C.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | McMillan C.,University of Waterloo | Lee J.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Lee J.,McMaster University | And 6 more authors.
Health and Social Care in the Community | Year: 2016

Despite the high health risks associated with severe mobility impairments, individuals with physical disabilities are less likely to receive the same level of primary care as able-bodied persons. This study explores family physicians’ perspectives on primary care for individuals with mobility impairments to identify and better understand the challenges that prevent equitable service delivery to this group of patients. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in the autumn of 2012 with a purposeful sample of 20 family physicians practising in Southwestern Ontario to gather their perspectives of the personal and professional barriers to healthcare delivery for individuals with mobility impairments, including perceptions of challenges, contributing reasons and possible improvements. A thematic analysis was conducted on the transcripts generated from the interviews to identify perceptions of existing barriers and gaps in care, needs and existing opportunities for improving primary care for this patient population. Eight themes emerged from the interviews that contributed to understanding the perceived challenges of providing care to patients with mobility impairments: transportation barriers, knowledge gaps and practice constraints resulting in episodic care rather than preventive care, incongruence between perceived and actual accessibility to care, emergency departments used as centres for primary care, inattention to mobility issues among specialist and community services, lack of easily accessible practice tools, low patient volumes impact decision-making regarding building decreased motivation to expand clinical capacity due to low patient volume, and lastly, remuneration issues. Despite this patient population presenting with high healthcare needs and significant barriers and care gaps in primary care, low prevalence rates negatively impact the acquisition of necessary equipment and knowledge required to optimally care for these patients in typical primary care settings. Novel approaches to address inequitable healthcare practices for this vulnerable group are needed. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Moore C.,University of Waterloo | Lee J.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Milligan J.,Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team | Giangregorio L.,University of Waterloo
Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism | Year: 2015

A Family Health Team (FHT) is a multi-disciplinary primary healthcare model that may be an ideal setting to engage patients in physical activity. An environmental scan was conducted to determine the prevalence and characteristics of physical activity services offered by FHTs in Ontario. Of the 186 FHTs, 102 (55%) completed the survey. Almost 60% of responding FHTs offered a physical activity service; however, the availability, duration, size, and target population of the services varied depending on the individual FHT. ©, 2006 National Research Council of Canada. All rights reserved.

Discover hidden collaborations