Sinicrope F.A.,North Central Cancer Treatment Group |
Foster N.R.,North Central Cancer Treatment Group |
Yothers G.,National Surgery Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project |
Benson A.,Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group |
And 6 more authors.
Cancer | Year: 2013
BACKGROUND: Although obesity is an established risk factor for developing colon cancer, its prognostic impact and relation to patient sex in colon cancer survivors remains unclear. METHODS: The authors examined the prognostic and predictive impact of the body mass index (BMI) in patients with stage II and III colon carcinoma (N = 25,291) within the Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints (ACCENT) database. BMI was measured at enrollment in randomized trials of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Association of BMI with the time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using Cox regression models. Statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 7.8 years, obese and underweight patients had significantly poorer survival compared with overweight and normal-weight patients. In a multivariable analysis, the adverse prognostic impact of BMI was observed among men but not among women (Pinteraction =.0129). Men with class 2 and 3 obesity (BMI ≥35.0 kg/m2) had a statistically significant reduction in DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.33; P =.0297) compared with normal-weight patients. Underweight patients had a significantly shorter TTR and reduced DFS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09-1.28; P <.0001) that was more significant among men (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.15-1.50; P <.0001) than among women (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23; P =.0362; Pinteraction =.0340). BMI was not predictive of a benefit from adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and underweight status were associated independently with inferior outcomes in patients with colon cancer who received treatment in adjuvant chemotherapy trials. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
Yothers G.,N-of-One |
Yothers G.,University of Pittsburgh |
Sargent D.J.,Mayo Clinic Cancer Center |
Sargent D.J.,North Central Cancer Treatment Group |
And 13 more authors.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | Year: 2011
Conclusion Background Among patients with resected colon cancer, black patients have worse survival than whites. We investigated whether disparities in survival and related endpoints would persist when patients were treated with identical therapies in controlled clinical trials.Conclusion Methods We assessed 14611 patients (1218 black and 13393 white) who received standardized adjuvant treatment in 12 randomized controlled clinical trials conducted in North America for resected stage II and stage III colon cancer between 1977 and 2002. Individual patient data on covariates and outcomes were extracted from the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoinTs (ACCENT) database. The endpoints examined in this meta-analysis were overall survival (time to death), recurrence-free survival (time to recurrence or death), and recurrence-free interval (time to recurrence). Cox models were stratified by study and controlled for sex, stage, age, and treatment to determine the effect of race. Kaplan-Meier estimates were adjusted for similar covariates to control for confounding. All statistical tests were two-sided.Conclusion Results Black patients were younger than whites (median age, 58 vs 61 years, respectively; P <. 001) and more likely to be female (55% vs 45%, respectively; P <. 001). Overall survival was worse in black patients than whites (hazard ratio [HR] of death = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.34, P <. 001). Five-year overall survival rates for blacks and whites were 68.2% and 72.8%, respectively. When subsets defined by sex, stage, and age were analyzed, overall survival was consistently worse in black patients. Recurrence-free survival was worse in black patients than whites (HR of recurrence or death = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.24, P =. 0045). Three-year recurrence-free survival rates in blacks and whites were 68.4% and 72.1%, respectively. In contrast, recurrence-free interval was similar in black and white patients (HR of recurrence = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.19, P =. 15). Three-year recurrence-free interval rates in blacks and whites were 71.3% and 74.2%, respectively.Conclusion Conclusion sBlack patients with resected stage II and stage III colon cancer who were treated with the same therapy as white patients experienced worse overall and recurrence-free survival, but similar recurrence-free interval, compared with white patients. The differences in survival may be mostly because of factors unrelated to the patients' adjuvant colon cancer treatment. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.
News Article | February 24, 2017
BOUDRY, Switzerland--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Celgene International Sàrl, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG), today announced that the European Commission (EC) has approved REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) as monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). REVLIMID® is the first and only licensed maintenance treatment available to these patients. The REVLIMID® Marketing Authorisation has been updated to include this new indication, which expands on the existing multiple myeloma indications as combination therapy for the treatment of those not eligible for transplant who are newly diagnosed, or have received at least one prior therapy. Multiple myeloma is an incurable and life-threatening blood cancer that is characterised by tumour proliferation and suppression of the immune system.1 It is a rare but deadly disease: around 39,000 people are diagnosed with multiple myeloma in Europe, and around 24,000 people die from the disease each year.2 The median age at diagnosis in Europe is between 65 and 70 years.3 In Europe, patients who are fit and in good clinical condition are typically considered eligible for ASCT.4 For patients who are newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma and eligible for ASCT, key treatment goals are to delay disease progression and ultimately achieve long-term control over multiple myeloma.5 These patients typically receive induction therapy and high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by ASCT. This treatment approach has been an established standard of care for over 20 years.6 Considering that over half of those patients who relapse do so within 2 to 3 years of ASCT,7,8 the approval of a maintenance therapy for use after ASCT that may delay disease progression represents a major advance for these patients. “ After ASCT, most patients will still see their disease recur or progress. We now have an opportunity to enhance immune function and delay disease progression by controlling residual malignant cells and slowing tumour growth. REVLIMID® has been shown to increase progression-free survival after ASCT in clinical trials. Having a licensed therapy for use in this very important setting means we now have the opportunity to delay disease progression by sustaining the response,” says Professor Michel Attal, Executive Director of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole and Institut Claudius Regaud, France. The EC decision to approve REVLIMID® as monotherapy for multiple myeloma in the post-ASCT setting was based on the results of two cooperative group-led studies, CALGB 1001049 and IFM 2005-02.10 In both studies, the primary efficacy endpoint in the study was progression-free survival (PFS) from transplant to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. REVLIMID® monotherapy as maintenance treatment post-ASCT significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with multiple myeloma, leading to the studies being unblinded based on passing their pre-specified boundary for superiority at interim analysis. The updated PFS, using a cut-off of 1 February 2016 continues to show a PFS advantage: Individual studies were not powered for an overall survival (OS) endpoint. Using a cut-off of 1 February 2016, a descriptive analysis showed that the median overall survival in the CALGB 100104 was 111.0 months (95% CI, 101.8, not estimable) for patients who received REVLIMID versus 84.2 (95% CI 71.0, 102.7) in the placebo arm (HR=0.61; 95% CI 0.46, 0.81; p<0.001). In the IFM 2005-02 study, median overall survival was 105.9 months (95% CI, 88.8, not estimable) for patients who received REVLIMID versus 88.1 (95% CI 80.7, 108.4) in the placebo arm (HR=0.90; 95% CI 0.72, 1.13; p=0.355, not significant). In both of these phase III studies, the safety profile was in line with other clinical data in newly diagnosed non-stem cell transplant and a post-approval safety study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The most commonly reported adverse events in these two studies were haematological, and included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The most commonly reported non-haematological adverse events were infections. An increased incidence rate of haematological second primary malignancies (SPMs) was also observed in the REVLIMID® group compared with the placebo group in both studies. However, the EC decision confirms that the benefit-risk ratio for REVLIMID® is positive in this expanded indication. Tuomo Pätsi, President of Celgene European and International Operations, said, “ We are glad to provide a treatment option for these patients with multiple myeloma, who have previously had no licensed medicine available to them for maintenance treatment following ASCT. This latest approval underlines the important role of REVLIMID® in the treatment of multiple myeloma, extending its use across the disease spectrum, and demonstrating our commitment to multiple myeloma patients. We continue to invest in research and development as we strive to turn multiple myeloma – and other currently incurable diseases – into manageable conditions.” The EC decision for the use of REVLIMID® as monotherapy for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who have undergone ASCT follows the positive opinion issued by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) in January 2017. Celgene announced on 22 February 2017 that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has expanded the existing indication for REVLIMID® to include use for patients with multiple myeloma as maintenance therapy following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the U.S. CALGB 100104 was a phase III, randomised, controlled, double-blind, multi-centre study conducted in 47 centres in the United States. A total of 460 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma – aged between 18 and 70 years – who achieved at least stable disease or better 100 days after undergoing autologous stem cell transplant, were randomised to receive either REVLIMID® maintenance (10 mg/day for 3 months, then 15 mg/day) or placebo, until disease progression, intolerable side effects or death. IFM 2005-02 was a phase III, controlled, double-blind, multi-centre study conducted in 77 centres across 3 countries in Europe. A total of 614 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma, who were younger than 65 years without signs of disease progression within 6 months of undergoing autologous stem cell transplant, were then randomised to receive a 2-month consolidation regimen of REVLIMID® monotherapy, 25 mg per day on 21/28 days, followed by either REVLIMID® maintenance (10 mg/day for 3 months, then 15 mg/day) or placebo, until disease progression, intolerable side effects or death. REVLIMID® as combination therapy is approved in Europe, in the United States, in Japan and in around 25 other countries for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) who are not eligible for transplant. REVLIMID® is also approved in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with MM who have received at least one prior therapy in nearly 70 countries, encompassing Europe, the Americas, the Middle-East and Asia, and in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients whose disease has progressed after one therapy in Australia and New Zealand. REVLIMID® is also approved in the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand and several Latin American countries, as well as Malaysia and Israel, for transfusion-dependent anaemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities and in Europe for the treatment of patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS associated with an isolated deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality when other therapeutic options are insufficient or inadequate. In addition, REVLIMID® is approved in Europe and in the United States for the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) whose disease has relapsed or progressed after two prior therapies, one of which included bortezomib. In Switzerland, REVLIMID is indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL after prior therapy that included bortezomib and chemotherapy/rituximab. REVLIMID is not indicated and is not recommended for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) outside of controlled clinical trials. REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients in the formulation. REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) is contraindicated during pregnancy, and also in women of childbearing potential unless all of the conditions of the Pregnancy Prevention Programme are met. Pregnancy: the conditions of the Pregnancy Prevention Programme must be fulfilled for all patients unless there is reliable evidence that the patient does not have childbearing potential. Cardiovascular disorders: patients with known risk factors for myocardial infarction or thromboembolism should be closely monitored. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia: complete blood cell counts should be performed every week for the first 8 weeks of treatment and monthly thereafter to monitor for cytopenias. A dose reduction may be required. Infection with or without neutropenia: all patients should be advised to seek medical attention promptly at the first sign of infection. Renal impairment: monitoring of renal function is advised in patients with renal impairment. Thyroid disorders: optimal control of co-morbid conditions influencing thyroid function is recommended before start of treatment. Baseline and ongoing monitoring of thyroid function is recommended. Tumour lysis syndrome: patients with high tumour burden prior to treatment should be monitored closely and appropriate precautions taken. Allergic reactions: patients who had previous allergic reactions while treated with thalidomide should be monitored closely. Severe skin reactions: REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) must be discontinued for exfoliative or bullous rash, or if SJS or TEN is suspected, and should not be resumed following discontinuation for these reactions. Interruption or discontinuation of lenalidomide should be considered for other forms of skin reaction depending on severity. Patients with a history of severe rash associated with thalidomide treatment should not receive lenalidomide. Lactose intolerance: patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take this medicinal product. Second primary malignancies (SPM): the risk of occurrence of hematologic SPM must be taken into account before initiating treatment with REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) either in combination with melphalan or immediately following high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Physicians should carefully evaluate patients before and during treatment using standard cancer screening for occurrence of SPM and institute treatment as indicated. Hepatic disorders: dose adjustments should be made in patients with renal impairment. Monitoring of liver function is recommended, particularly when there is a history of or concurrent viral liver infection or when REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) is combined with medicinal products known to be associated with liver dysfunction. Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: patients should be carefully assessed for their ability to tolerate REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) in combination, with consideration to age, ISS stage III, ECOG PS≤2 or CLcr<60 mL/min. Summary of the safety profile in multiple myeloma Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: patients who have undergone ASCT treated with REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) maintenance: Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: patients who are not eligible for transplant treated with REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) in combination with low dose dexamethasone: Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: patients who are not eligible for ASCT treated with REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) in combination with melphalan and prednisone: Patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy: Paediatric population: REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) should not be used in children and adolescents from birth to less than 18 years. Older people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: for patients older than 75 years of age treated with REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone, the starting dose of dexamethasone is 20 mg/day on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day treatment cycle. No dose adjustment is proposed for patients older than 75 years who are treated with REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) in combination with melphalan and prednisone. Older people with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy: care should be taken in dose selection and it would be prudent to monitor renal function. Patients with renal impairment: care should be taken in dose selection and monitoring of renal function is advised. No dose adjustments are required for patients with mild renal impairment and multiple myeloma. Dose adjustments are recommended at the start of therapy and throughout treatment for patients with moderate or severe impaired renal function or end stage renal disease. Patients with hepatic impairment: REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) has not formally been studied in patients with impaired hepatic function and there are no specific dose recommendations. Please refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics for full European prescribing information. Celgene International Sàrl, located in Boudry, Switzerland, is a wholly-owned subsidiary and International Headquarters of Celgene Corporation. Celgene Corporation, headquartered in Summit, New Jersey, is an integrated global pharmaceutical company engaged primarily in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases through next-generation solutions in protein homeostasis, immuno-oncology, epigenetics, immunology and neuro-inflammation. For more information, please visit www.celgene.com. Follow Celgene on Social Media: @Celgene, Pinterest, LinkedIn, FaceBook and YouTube. This press release contains forward-looking statements, which are generally statements that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the words "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "intends," "estimates," "plans," "will," “outlook” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s current plans, estimates, assumptions and projections, and speak only as of the date they are made. Celgene undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in light of new information or future events, except as otherwise required by law. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond Celgene’s control. Actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of the impact of a number of factors, many of which are discussed in more detail in Celgene’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All registered trademarks are owned by Celgene Corporation. 9 McCarthy PL, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1770-1781. CALGB is the cooperative group Cancer and Leukemia Group B (now known as Alliance). 10 Attal M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1782-1791. IFM is the cooperative group Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.
Sakurada A.,Ontario Cancer Institute |
Ludkovski O.,Ontario Cancer Institute |
Liu N.,Ontario Cancer Institute |
Maitre A.L.,Queen's University |
And 6 more authors.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | Year: 2011
PURPOSE: Patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations may have a more favorable prognosis and greater response to chemotherapy. The effect of EGFR mutation and gene copy on patients with early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma receiving adjuvant chemotherapy has not been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor samples from NCIC Clinical Trials Group JBR.10, an adjuvant trial of vinorelbine/cisplatin adjuvant chemotherapy [ACT] versus observation (OBS), were analyzed for EGFR mutation by multiple sensitive methods and copy number by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Their prognostic and predictive roles were explored in correlation with survival. RESULTS: Mutation results were available in 221 OBS and 215 ACT and fluorescent in situ hybridization results in 159 OBS and 163 ACT patients. Mutations were identified in 43 (27 OBS and 16 ACT) patients (36 sensitizing exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations). Compared with wild-type, sensitizing mutations were not significantly prognostic in OBS patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.63, p = 0.53). Although the presence of sensitizing mutations resulted in relatively greater benefit in ACT patients (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.11-1.70, p = 0.22) compared with wild-type patients (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.58-1.06, p = 0.12), this quantitative difference was not significant (interaction p = 0.50). Similarly, high EGFR copy was neither significantly prognostic nor predictive, although quantitatively it was associated with greater benefit from ACT. CONCLUSIONS: Trends toward longer survival and a greater benefit from chemotherapy were observed in patients with exon 19/21 mutations and high EGFR copy, although the differences were not statistically significant. The interpretation of the results was limited by the low EGFR mutation rate in this study of mainly white patients. Copyright © 2010 by the international Association fot the Study of lung Cancer.
Peppercorn J.,Duke University |
Shapira I.,Hofstra University |
Deshields T.,Barnes Jewish Hospital |
Kroetz D.,University of California at San Francisco |
And 6 more authors.
Cancer | Year: 2012
BACKGROUND: The rapid pace of genetics research, coupled with evolving standards for informed consent, can create ethical challenges regarding future use of tissue or information from completed clinical trials. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Oncology Cooperative Group was faced with an ethical dilemma regarding sharing genetic data from a completed genome-wide association study (GWAS) that was conducted as part of a large, multicenter breast cancer clinical trial with a national database: the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes National Center for Biotechnology Information (dbGaP). METHODS: The CALGB Ethics Committee conducted a series of multidisciplinary meetings and teleconferences involving patient advocates, bioethicists, clinical researchers, and clinical oncologists to evaluate the ethical issues raised by this case and to identify lessons for improving informed consent to future genetics research in oncology trials. RESULTS: The Ethics Committee recommended that GWAS data be provided to dbGaP consistent with documented consent for future use of tissue among trial participants. Ethical issues, including adequacy of informed consent to future research, limitations of privacy in modern genetics research, the potential impact of population-based genetics research on health disparities, and recontact of research participants for clinical care or further research, were identified as major ethical considerations in this area. CONCLUSIONS: Although modern standards for informed consent should not prohibit research or sharing of data consistent with participant's intent and the public interest, there is an urgent need for national consensus on the appropriate use of archived tissue and standardized informed consent for future research among cancer clinical trial participants. Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.
News Article | November 7, 2016
Eleven Presentations Evaluating Marketed and Investigational Compounds for Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Presentations Include a Sub-Analysis of Phase 3 Data for Vyxeos (CPX-351), an investigational product for the treatment of AML Patients DUBLIN, Nov. 7, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (Nasdaq: JAZZ) announced today that eleven abstracts, including four oral presentations, supporting the company's hematology and oncology portfolio will be presented at the 58th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition in San Diego, California, December 3-6, 2016. "The data presentations at ASH reflect our efforts in advancing our diversified pipeline of programs in hematology and oncology, including rare blood disorders such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and AML, and in complications of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) such as hepatic VOD," said Karen Smith, M.D., Ph.D., global head of research and development and chief medical officer at Jazz Pharmaceuticals. "Of note, we look forward to sharing a post-hoc sub-analysis of Phase 3 survival data following allogeneic HSCT in older high-risk AML patients that compares CPX-351, also known as Vyxeos, with the standard of care." The following oral and poster presentations focusing on Defitelio® (defibrotide sodium) injection, Erwinaze® (asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi) and CPX-351(cytarabine and daunorubicin liposome injection) will be presented at ASH. Additionally, one Jazz-sponsored Investigator Initiated Research poster presentation focusing on CPX-351 as an investigational agent for the treatment of AML will be presented at ASH. Full details of the ASH 2016 annual meeting can be found here (http://www.hematology.org/Annual-Meeting/) and abstracts can be found here (https://ash.confex.com/ash/2016/webprogram/start.html). About Defitelio1 In the U.S., Defitelio® (defibrotide sodium) injection 80mg/mL received FDA marketing approval on March 30, 2016 for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), also known as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), with renal or pulmonary dysfunction following hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and is the first and only FDA-approved therapy for patients with this rare, potentially fatal complication. Defitelio is contraindicated in patients currently taking anticoagulants or fibrinolytics and in patients who are allergic to Defitelio or any of its ingredients. Defitelio may increase the risk of bleeding and should be withheld or stopped if significant bleeding occurs. Patients should be monitored for allergic reactions, especially if there is a history of previous exposure to Defitelio. The most common side effects of Defitelio are decreased blood pressure, diarrhea, vomiting, nausea and nose bleeds. Please see full for Defitelio. (https://defitelio.com/DefitelioPI.pdf) In Europe, defibrotide is marketed under the name Defitelio®▼(defibrotide). In October 2013, the European Commission granted marketing authorization to Defitelio under exceptional circumstances for the treatment of severe VOD in patients undergoing HSCT therapy. It is the first and only approved treatment in Europe for severe VOD. In Europe, Defitelio is indicated in patients over one month of age. It is not indicated in patients with hypersensitivity to defibrotide or any of its excipients or with concomitant use of thrombolytic therapy. ▼This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the national reporting system found under section 4.8 of the SmPC. (http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=/pages/medicines/human/medicines/002393/human_med_001646.jsp) About VOD HSCT is an aggressive, potentially curative procedure to treat patients with malignant and non-cancerous hematologic disorders such as leukemia, lymphoma and aplastic anemia, and congenital immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders.2 VOD is a rare complication of HSCT, which occurs in approximately 9-14% of HSCT patients.3,4 Hepatic VOD, also known as SOS, is an early and life-threatening complication affecting the sinusoidal endothelial cells of the liver, which can typically occur within the first 21 days following HSCT.4,5 Hepatic VOD progresses to multi-organ dysfunction in approximately 30-50% of cases.5 VOD with multi-organ dysfunction (MOD) is associated with an overall mortality (death) rate of 84%.3 MOD is characterized by the presence of renal or pulmonary dysfunction.6,7 VOD is often characterized by sudden weight gain, hepatomegaly (abnormally enlarged liver), and elevated bilirubin.6,7 About Erwinaze Erwinaze® (asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi) is currently approved in the U.S. for administration via intramuscular injection or via intravenous infusion in conjunction with chemotherapy. It is indicated as a component of a multi-agent chemotherapeutic regimen for the treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have developed hypersensitivity to E. coli-derived asparaginase.8 Erwinaze is derived from the bacterium Erwinia chrysanthemi and is therefore immunologically distinct from E. coli-derived asparaginase and suitable for patients with hypersensitivity to E. coli-derived treatments9. Outside of the U.S., Erwinaze is sold under the name Erwinase®. Please consult local labeling for product information specific to your country. Erwinaze is contraindicated in patients who have had serious allergic reactions to Erwinaze, or had serious swelling of the pancreas, serious blood clots, or serious bleeding with past L-asparaginase treatment. Erwinaze should be discontinued if any of the following occur: serious allergic reactions, including a feeling of tightness in the throat, unusual swelling/redness in the throat and/or tongue, or trouble bleeding; or severe inflammation of the pancreas. Glucose intolerance has been reported, which in some cases may be irreversible. If blood clots of bleeding occur, discontinue Erwinaze until symptoms resolve. The most common side effects of Erwinaze are allergic reactions, too much sugar in the blood, fever, swelling of the pancreas, local reactions (swelling, rash, etc. where the needle entered the skin), vomiting, nausea, blood clots, liver problems, stomach pain/discomfort, and diarrhea. Please see full Prescribing Information for Erwinaze. (https://www.jazzpharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/erwinaze-en-PI.pdf) About Vyxeos (CPX-351) CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin liposome injection) is an investigational product being evaluated for the treatment of AML and is a combination of cytarabine and daunorubicin encapsulated within a nano-scale liposome at a 5:1 molar ratio. The proposed trade name, Vyxeos™, is conditionally approved by the FDA and is subject to confirmation upon approval of the NDA. CPX-351 was granted orphan drug status by the FDA and the European Commission for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. CPX-351 was granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for the treatment of adults with therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes and was also granted Fast Track designation by the FDA for the treatment of older patients with secondary AML. On October 3, 2016 Jazz announced the initiation of a rolling submission of a New Drug Application (NDA) to the FDA, seeking marketing approval of CPX-351 for the treatment of AML. About Acute Myeloid Leukemia Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly progressing and life-threatening blood cancer that rises in frequency with age.16 The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be 19,950 new cases of AML and 10,430 deaths from AML in the U.S. in 2016.10 In the European Union, the number of new cases is estimated to be 20,100 in 2016.11 The median age at diagnosis is 67 and with rising age there is progressive worsening of prognosis.10,12 Advancing age is associated with increasing risk of specific chromosomal/mutational changes and risk of pre-malignant marrow disorders which give rise to more aggressive and less responsive forms of AML.13,14 As patients age there is also reduced tolerance for intensive chemotherapy.15 As a consequence, advances in supportive care, intensive chemotherapy, and bone marrow transplantation have primarily benefitted younger patients with approximately one third of patients 18-60 years of age achieving cure.13,15 Older patients have not achieved higher rates of cure or improved upon a 5-year survival rate of 10-20% in spite of 40 years of research.15,16 About Jazz Pharmaceuticals Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc (Nasdaq: JAZZ) is an international biopharmaceutical company focused on improving patients' lives by identifying, developing and commercializing meaningful products that address unmet medical needs. The company has a diverse portfolio of products and product candidates, with a focus in the areas of sleep and hematology/oncology. In these areas, Jazz Pharmaceuticals markets Xyrem® (sodium oxybate) oral solution, Erwinaze® (asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi) and Defitelio® (defibrotide sodium) in the U.S. and markets Erwinase® and Defitelio® (defibrotide) in countries outside the U.S. For more information, please visit www.jazzpharmaceuticals.com. References: 1 Defitelio (defibrotide sodium) [package insert]. Palo Alto, CA: Jazz Pharmaceuticals; March 30, 2016. 2 Ikehara S. New strategies for BMT and organ transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2002;76(Suppl 1):161-4. 3 Coppell JA, Richardson PG, Soiffer R, et al. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease following stem cell transplantation: incidence, clinical course, and outcome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16(2):157-168. 4 Tsirigotis PD, Resnick IB, Avni B, et al. Incidence and risk factors for moderate-to-severe veno-occlusive disease of the liver after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(11):1389-1392. 5 Carreras E, Díaz-Beyá M, Rosiñol L, et al. The incidence of veno-occlusive disease following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has diminished and the outcome improved over the last decade. Biol Blood MarrowTransplant. 2011;17(11):1713-1720. 6 Carreras E. How I manage sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after haematopoietic cell transplantation. Brit J Haematol. 2015 Feb.; 168 (4); 481-91. 7 Mohty M, Malard F, Abecassis M, et al. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno‐occlusive disease: current situation and perspectives—a position statement from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(6):781‐789. 8 Erwinaze® (asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi) [prescribing information]. Palo Alto, CA: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., December 2014. 9 Pieters R, Hunger SP, Boos J, et al. L-asparaginase treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a focus on Erwinia asparaginase. Cancer. 2011 Jan 15; 117(2): 238–249. 10 American Cancer Society. Leukemia--Acute Myeloid (Myelogenous). Detailed Guide. What are the key statistics about acute myeloid leukemia? http://www.cancer.org/cancer/leukemia-acutemyeloidaml/detailedguide/leukemia-acute-myeloid-myelogenous-key-statistics. Last revised February 22, 2016. Accessed November 3, 2016. 11 Decisions Research Group. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. https://decisionresourcesgroup.com/report/141439-biopharma-acute-myeloid-leukemia/. Published November 2015. Accessed November 3, 2016. 12 Baer M, George S, Sanford B, et al. Escalation of daunorubicin and addition of etoposide in the ADE regimen in acute myeloid leukemia patients aged 60 years and older: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9720. Leukemia. 2011;25(5):10.1038/leu.2011.9. doi:10.1038/leu.2011.9. 13 Ferrara F, Schiffer CA. Acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):484-495. 14 Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010 Jan 21;115(3):453-474. 15 Stone RM, O'Donnell MR, Sekeres MA. Acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2004:98-117. 16 Kadia TM, Ravandi F, Cortes J, Kantarjian H. New drugs in acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):770-778.
Von Mehren M.,Chase Medical |
Rankin C.,Southwest Oncology Group |
Goldblum J.R.,Cleveland Clinic |
Demetri G.D.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute |
And 5 more authors.
Cancer | Year: 2012
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) have limited therapeutic options. Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of raf, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 (VEGFR1) through 3, platelet-derived growth factor B, fms-like tyrosine kinase 3, and c-kit, and some of these may be relevant in STS. METHODS: The authors tested sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in patients with advanced vascular sarcoma (VS), high-grade liposarcomas, and leiomyosarcomas who had received 0 or 1 previous regimens for advanced disease. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were accrued to the study, and 37 were evaluable for toxicity and response. There were no unexpected side effects and no confirmed responses. The median progression-free survival was 3 months, and the median overall survival was 17 months. Six of 8 patients in the VS cohort had prolonged clinical benefit (stable disease or better), resulting in a median progression-free survival of 5 months compared with 2 to 3 months for the patients who had liposarcoma and leiomyosarcomas. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib at the dose and schedule studied did not result in any responses in the VS, liposarcoma, or leiomyosarcoma cohort according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. © 2011 American Cancer Society.
Powell B.L.,Cancer and Leukemia Group B |
Moser B.,Cancer and Leukemia Group B |
Stock W.,Cancer and Leukemia Group B |
Gallagher R.E.,Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group |
And 10 more authors.
Blood | Year: 2010
Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) is a highly effective treatment for patients with relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); its role as consolidation treatment for patients in first remission has not been defined. We randomized 481 patients (age ≥ 15 years) with untreated APL to either a standard induction regimen of tretinoin, cytarabine, and daunorubicin, followed by 2 courses of consolidation therapy with tretinoin plus daunorubicin, or to the same induction and consolidation regimen plus two 25-day courses of As2O3 consolidation immediately after induction. After consolidation, patients were randomly assigned to one year of maintenance therapy with either tretinoin alone or in combination with methotrexate and mercaptopurine. Ninety percent of patients on each arm achieved remission and were eligible to receive their assigned consolidation therapy. Event-free survival, the primary end point, was significantly better for patients assigned to receive As2O3 consolidation, 80% compared with 63% at 3 years (stratified logrank test, P < .0001). Survival, a secondary end point, was better in the As2O3 arm, 86% compared with 81% at 3 years (P = .059). Disease-free survival, a secondary end point, was significantly better in the As2O3 arm, 90% compared with 70% at 3 years (P < .0001). The addition of As2O3 consolidation to standard induction and consolidation therapy significantly improves event-free and disease-free survival in adults with newly diagnosed APL. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00003934). © 2010 by The American Society of Hematology.
La Comision Europea aprueba REVLIMIDR lenalidomida como terapia de mantenimiento en pacientes con Mieloma Multiple de nuevo diagnostico tras recibir un Trasplante Autologo de Progenitores Hematopoyeticos
News Article | February 24, 2017
Los estudios individuales no tenían como prioridad analizar la supervivencia global (SG). Un análisis descriptivo de los datos del ensayo CALGB 100104, a fecha de 1 de febrero de 2016, mostró que la mediana de SG fue de 111,0 meses (IC 95%, 101,8; no estimable) para los pacientes que recibieron lenalidomida frente a 84,2 (IC del 95% 71,0; 102,7) en el grupo de placebo (HR = 0,61; IC del 95%: 0,46; 0,81; p <0,001). En el estudio IFM 2005-02, la mediana de SG fue de 105,9 meses (IC 95%, 88,8; no estimable) con lenalidomida y de 88,1 (IC 95%: 80,7; 108,4) en el grupo de placebo (HR = 0,90; IC del 95% 0,72; 1,13; p = 0,355). Estos ensayos mostraron un perfil de seguridad de lenalidomida similar al observado en otros ensayos en pacientes con Mieloma Múltiple de nuevo diagnóstico no candidatos a TAPH y en los estudios post autorización en pacientes con Mieloma Múltiple en recaída o refractario. Los efectos adversos hematológicos más frecuentes observados fueron neutropenia y trombocitopenia. Dentro de los no hematológicos, los más comunes fueron infecciones. En ambos ensayos se observó un aumento de incidencia de segundas neoplasias primarias en el brazo de lenalidomida. No obstante, la opinión positiva del CHMP confirma una relación beneficio-riesgo de lenalidomida positiva para esta nueva indicación. 8 McCarthy PL, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1770-1781. CALGB is the cooperative group Cancer and Leukemia Group B (now known as Alliance). 9 Attal M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1782-1791. IFM is the cooperative group Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.