Anitua E.,BTI Biotechnology Institute IMASD |
Prado R.,BTI Biotechnology Institute IMASD |
Muruzabal F.,BTI Biotechnology Institute IMASD |
Andia I.,BTI Biotechnology Institute IMASD
Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery | Year: 2010
Purpose: To investigate whether the application of a particular platelet-rich plasma preparation rich in growth factors (PRGF) during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery gives a potential advantage for better tendon graft ligamentization. Methods: This study included 37 volunteers who underwent either conventional (control group, n = 15) or PRGF-assisted (n = 22) ACL reconstruction with an autogenous hamstring and required second-look arthroscopy to remove hardware or loose bodies, treat meniscal tears or plica syndrome, or resect cyclops lesions at 6 to 24 months after ACL surgery. The gross morphologies of the grafts were evaluated on second-look arthroscopy by use of the full arthroscopic score (0 to 4 points) to evaluate graft thickness and apparent tension (0 to 2 points) plus synovial coverage (0 to 2 points). At the same time, biopsy specimens were harvested uniformly from the grafted tendons. In these specimens the histologic transformation of the tendon graft to ACL-like tissue was evaluated by use of the Ligament Tissue Maturity Index, and a score to assess the progression of new connective tissue enveloping the graft was created by use of 3 criteria previously used to characterize changes during ligament healing: cellularity, vascularity, and collagen properties. Results: The overall arthroscopic evaluation of PRGF-treated grafts showed an excellent rating in 57.1% of the knees (score of 4) and a fair rating in 42.9% (score of 2 or 3). In contrast, evaluation of untreated grafts showed an excellent rating in 33.3% of the knees, a fair rating in 46.7%, and a poor rating in 20% (score of 0 or 1). Overall, arthroscopic evaluations were not statistically different between PRGF and control groups (P = .051). PRGF treatment influenced the histologic characteristics of the tendon graft, resulting in tissue that was more mature than in controls (P = .024). Histologically evident newly formed connective tissue enveloping the graft was present in 77.3% of PRGF-treated grafts and 40% of controls. The appearance of the connective tissue envelope changed with increasing time from surgery. On the basis of the histologic findings, we suggest that the remodeling of PRGF-treated grafts involves the formation of synovial-like tissue enveloping the graft. This tissue is eventually integrated in the remodeled tendon graft, conferring a similar appearance to the normal ACL. Conclusions: The use of PRGF influenced the histologic characteristics of tendon grafts, resulting in more remodeling compared with untreated grafts. We have shown temporal histologic changes during the 6- to 24-month postoperative period of graft maturation, with newly formed connective tissue enveloping most grafts treated with PRGF. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study. © 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America.
Comparison of intra-articular injections of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF-Endoret) versus durolane hyaluronic acid in the treatment of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial
Vaquerizo V.,University of Alcalá |
Plasencia M.A.,University of Alcalá |
Arribas I.,University of Alcalá |
Seijas R.,Hospital Quiron Barcelona |
And 3 more authors.
Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery | Year: 2013
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety in a randomized, clinical trial of 3 injections of PRGF-Endoret (BTI Biotechnology Institute, Vitoria, Spain) versus one single intra-articular injection of Durolane hyaluronic acid (HA) (Q-MED AB, Uppsala, Sweden) as a treatment for reducing symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods Ninety-six patients with symptomatic knee OA were randomly assigned to receive PRGF-Endoret (3 injections on a weekly basis) or one infiltration with Durolane HA. The primary outcome measures were a 30% decrease and a 50% decrease in the summed score for the pain, physical function, and stiffness subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Lequesne scores from baseline to weeks 24 and 48. The percentage of OMERACT-OARSI (Outcome Measures for Rheumatology Committee and Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials Response Criteria Initiative) responders was also documented. As secondary outcomes, pain, stiffness, and physical function by use of the WOMAC and the Lequesne score were considered and overall safety of the injection themselves. Results The mean age of the patients was 63.6 years. Treatment with PRGF-Endoret was significantly more efficient than treatment with Durolane HA in reducing knee pain and stiffness and improving physical function in patients with knee OA. The rate of response to PRGF-Endoret was significantly higher than the rate of response to HA for all the scores including pain, stiffness, and physical function on the WOMAC, Lequesne index, and OMERACT-OARSI responders at 24 and 48 weeks. Adverse events were mild and evenly distributed between the groups. Conclusions Our findings show that PRGF-Endoret is safe and significantly superior to Durolane HA in primary and secondary efficacy analysis both at 24 and 48 weeks; provides a significant clinical improvement, reducing patients' pain and improving joint stiffness and physical function with respect to basal levels in patients with knee OA; and should be considered in the treatment of patients with knee OA. Level of Evidence Level I, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. © 2013 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America.