Mayfield West, Australia
Mayfield West, Australia

Time filter

Source Type

Kheir M.,IMS Connector Systems GmbH | Kroger T.,Bradken | Hoft M.,University of Kiel
IEEE Access | Year: 2017

Modern wireless communication systems typically employ multiple frequency bands for several standards. A new class of miniaturized ring filters with tuning capability is introduced for this purpose. The proposed filter structure is based on a single multi-mode resonator with variable section impedances in microstrip technology. The bandwidth of the filter can be significantly extended to cover the whole ultra wideband (UWB) frequency range with high adjustability. Moreover, a tunable bandnotch is introduced within the filter response, which can be arbitrarily placed according to the required application. Varactor and PIN diodes are also utilized to facilitate a high tuning capability throughout the different filter characteristics with respect to bandwidth, center frequency, and bandnotch frequency. Based on the symmetry of the filter, even-odd mode analysis is applied to investigate the different filter design characteristics. In addition, a comprehensive transmission line model is investigated within this paper which showed excellent agreements with full-wave simulations and measurements. The implemented UWB filter is investigated with respect to its frequency-domain characteristics and group delay response. The realized filter has a fractional bandwidth of more than 119% with a low group delay. All measured results are in a very good agreement with analysis and simulations. The overall filter dimensions, including housing, do not exceed 25 mm × 25 mm. © 2013 IEEE.


News Article | May 16, 2017
Site: www.businesswire.com

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Scout RFP, a leader in the cloud-based strategic e-sourcing space, is pleased to introduce a new procurement industry resource created by Harvard Business Review Analytic Services. The new research paper explores the critical role that sourcing, procurement, and supply chain management play in enterprise success. It includes insights from leaders at Accenture, Adobe, Bradken Limited, Deloitte, Intuit, Levi Strauss & Co., Owens Corning, Uber, and VSP Global. Click here to download the research. Today’s high-performing procurement teams have evolved into an essential contributor to enterprise revenue success. To maximize potential, the enterprise must embrace solutions that enable visibility, collaboration, and automation across sourcing processes. Fortunately, cloud platforms have evolved to facilitate the optimization of supplier and stakeholder relationships, allowing the enterprise to drive better outcomes. “Sourcing is something that’s almost entirely within our control. Not only are we delivering a prize in the form of substantial added value to the business, we can chase that prize at our own pace,” Paul Zuckerman, CEO of Bradken, says in the report. “Inflection points don’t usually look inspirational at first glance, but leveraging the familiar is what we did to reinvent ourselves and it paid off.” The report focuses on the enterprise-wide benefits that truly strategic sourcing provides. “Digital disruption has meant that enterprises now have to optimize performance across all areas of the business to stay competitive,” said Scout RFP’s CEO Alex Yakubovich. “High-performing companies are solving business problems and improving speed to market, so much so that companies that focus on strategic sourcing enjoy not just enhanced profitability, but a range of positive results including improved cash and working-capital performance.” Strategic sourcing improves outcomes across the business. Among its many benefits, it bridges the gap between businesses and their suppliers, drives efficiencies, helps businesses pursue proven processes from an enterprise perspective, solves business problems, improves speed to market, encourages constructive competition, manages supplier-related risk, and ensures compliance. “It’s not just about cost savings—which was the traditional mindset of the procurement function,” Neil Aronson, head of global strategic sourcing at the San Francisco-based online transportation network firm Uber Technologies Inc., says in the report. “It’s about continually improving and re-evaluating how we’re buying to make sure we’re getting the best outcomes. The sourcing function brings a rigorous process to bear to drive value beyond cost savings.” Scout, also known as Scout RFP, provides a new breed of cloud-based strategic sourcing solutions that help organizations achieve better outcomes and make a bigger impact. Leading brands like Intuit, CEMEX, Splunk, Jo-Ann Stores, ServiceNow, Cerner Corporation, EasyJet, and Zebra Technologies trust Scout’s automated sourcing and auction platform to deliver greater value through collaborative business engagement. 26,000 active users across 89 countries have chosen Scout’s simple, effective interface to streamline supplier selection, centralize data, and make more informed purchasing decisions, faster. Scout is headquartered in San Francisco, and funded by New Enterprise Associates (NEA) and GV (formerly Google Ventures). To learn more, please visit scoutrfp.com and follow us on Twitter @scoutrfp or LinkedIn.


News Article | May 24, 2017
Site: www.businesswire.com

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Scout RFP, a leader in cloud-based strategic e-sourcing solutions, announced today that it has been named one of Gartner’s 2017 “Cool Vendors” in Procurement and Sourcing Technology.1 The report identifies interesting, new and innovative vendors, products and services. It also explores key findings and recommendations for procurement and IT leaders to keep their businesses compliant and operating at peak performance. A complimentary copy of Gartner’s report can be found here. The Gartner report recognizes “vendors delighting customers with innovation and positive business impacts.” Gartner goes on to share, the technology solutions of the evaluated “vendors bring a refreshingly new, disruptive approach to solving age-old problems in the procurement and sourcing domain.”1 Scout’s cloud-based eSourcing platform enables companies to streamline supplier selection, centralize data, and make faster, more informed purchasing decisions. Its strategic sourcing, pipeline, intake, and eAuction tools help procurement professionals source fast and make a bigger business impact. “We are thrilled to receive the Cool Vendor recognition from Gartner and feel it validates our vision,” said Scout RFP CEO Alex Yakubovich. “Over the last 17 months, we’ve experienced rapid growth and are excited that our customers’ feedback matches Gartner’s assessment. Scout has been deployed globally by some of the world’s leading enterprises and our sourcing platform is enabling the enterprise to execute truly strategic sourcing.” Scout’s inclusion on Gartner’s Cool Vendors list follows the release of its HBR Analytic Services procurement industry research, which explores the critical roles that sourcing, procurement, and supply chain management play in enterprise success. The new research paper includes insights from leaders at Accenture, Adobe, Bradken Limited, Deloitte, Intuit, Levi Strauss & Co., Owens Corning, Uber, and VSP Global. Click here to access Gartner’s 2017 Cool Vendors in Procurement and Sourcing Technology report. For more information on Scout RFP, visit www.scoutrfp.com or watch the product overview video. 1 Gartner, Cool Vendors in Procurement and Sourcing Technology, 2017, Desere Edwards, Deborah R Wilson, Magnus Bergfors, May 15, 2017 Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Scout, also known as Scout RFP, provides a new breed of cloud-based strategic sourcing solutions that help organizations achieve better outcomes and make a bigger impact. Leading brands like Intuit, CEMEX, Splunk, Jo-Ann Stores, ServiceNow, Cerner Corporation, EasyJet, and Zebra Technologies trust Scout’s automated sourcing and auction platform to deliver greater value through collaborative business engagement. 27,000 active users across 89 countries have chosen Scout’s simple, effective interface to streamline supplier selection, centralize data, and make more informed purchasing decisions, faster. Scout is headquartered in San Francisco, and funded by New Enterprise Associates (NEA) and GV (formerly Google Ventures). To learn more, please visit scoutrfp.com and follow us on Twitter @scoutrfp or LinkedIn.


Mostafavi S.S.,University of New South Wales | Zhang L.C.,University of New South Wales | Lunn J.,Bradken
Key Engineering Materials | Year: 2010

Edge chipping by an indenter has been used to investigate the fragmentation of brittle materials. This paper proposed a constitutive model for studying both the initiation and propagation of cracks during the chipping of concrete. The analysis was carried out by the finite element method using a commercially available code, LS-DYNA. The results showed that a zone with very high compressive stresses appears beneath the indenter and causes the material to break or crush. Most of the external work, about 78%, was dissipated in the crushing zone while only a small percentage (less than 17%) contributed to form chips/fragments. As the indentation proceeded, radian-median cracks initiated and propagated downward and parallel to the front surface of the material to form a half penny crack. The crack tips from both sides of the indenter on the surface would then deviate toward the free edge, leading to a chipping scallop at a critical load. © (2010) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.


Sivaneri N.T.,West Virginia University | Kavipurapu P.,Bradken
54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference | Year: 2013

The dynamic response of simply supported glass/epoxy composite beams subjected to moving loads in a hygrothermal environment is carried out using the general purpose finite element program ANSYS. The moving load model and the hygrothermal incorporation are validated separately by reproducing results available in the literature. The hygrothermal effect is introduced by using empirical relations for degrading the material stiffness properties of the matrix. The corresponding ply properties are calculated using the rule of mixtures. A parametric study is conducted by varying the fiber volume fraction and the fiber orientation of the angle plies in the laminate. The results indicate that the dynamic magnification factors generally increase due to hygrothermal effects but all the laminates considered do not behave in a similar manner. Thus it is possible to minimize the environmental effect by judiciously selecting the laminate configuration. © 2013 by Nithi Sivaneri.


Wu X.,Bradken | Wu X.,Shanxi Normal University | Wang F.,Shanxi Normal University | Wang C.,Shanxi Normal University
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | Year: 2015

The magnetic properties and reversal process of L10-FePt/Fe and L10-FePt exchange coupled graded nanodots were investigated using the object-oriented micromagnetic framework (OOMMF). It is indicated that the increase in anisotropy gradient span of L10-FePt section is favorable for the reduction in coercivity for L10-FePt/Fe graded nanodots. However, the low remanence magnetization and squareness ratio caused by the large gradient span is not popular for recording media. If the Fe soft section is removed, the low coercivity and high squareness ratio can be achieved simultaneously for L10-FePt graded nanodots with an appropriate gradient design. Therefore, the combination of exchange coupled graded structure and bit patterned media is an effective approach to balance the trilemma issues of current perpendicular magnetic recording media. © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


David D.,Steel Founders Society of America | Monroe R.,Steel Founders Society of America | Thomas E.,Bradken
Welding Journal | Year: 2015

AWS B2.1, D1.6, and a stringent standard such as ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code ( BPVC). Section IX recognize cast grades and allow the use of the same Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) as other similar steels in other product forms. AWS D1.1 should add cast grades. Its users can use prequalified WPS. The WPS is a document specifying how the welding process must be done to ensure sound and quality welds. These standards identify cast carbon grades as Groups I and II in their base metal grouping. The mechanical properties of these cast grades are also comparable to the prequalified base metals. Both ASME BPVC Section IX and ASTM A488 allow the qualification of welding of castings using wrought steel in the same P-number group.


News Article | November 4, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

Notes: Sales, means the sales volume of Armour Plate Revenue, means the sales value of Armour Plate This report studies sales (consumption) of Armour Plate in Global market, especially in USA, China, Europe, Japan, India and Southeast Asia, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering SSAB JFE ThyssenKrupp Dillinger ESSAR Steel Algoma Ruukki ArcelorMittal Bisalloy Bradken WUYANG Steel BAOSTEEL ANSTEEL WISCO Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Armour Plate in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like USA China Europe Japan India Southeast Asia Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Armour Plate in each application, can be divided into Military Armor cash carrier Application 3 Global Armour Plate Sales Market Report 2016 1 Armour Plate Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Armour Plate 1.2 Classification of Armour Plate 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Armour Plate 1.3.1 Military 1.3.2 Armor cash carrier 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Armour Plate Market by Regions 1.4.1 USA Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Armour Plate (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Armour Plate Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 2 Global Armour Plate Competition by Manufacturers, Type and Application 2.1 Global Armour Plate Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1.1 Global Armour Plate Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.1.2 Global Armour Plate Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) 2.2 Global Armour Plate (Volume and Value) by Type 2.2.1 Global Armour Plate Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.2.2 Global Armour Plate Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) 2.3 Global Armour Plate (Volume and Value) by Regions 2.3.1 Global Armour Plate Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.3.2 Global Armour Plate Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) 2.4 Global Armour Plate (Volume) by Application Figure Picture of Armour Plate Table Classification of Armour Plate Figure Global Sales Market Share of Armour Plate by Type in 2015 Figure Type I Picture Figure Type II Picture Table Applications of Armour Plate Figure Global Sales Market Share of Armour Plate by Application in 2015 Figure Military Examples Figure Armor cash carrier Examples Figure USA Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure China Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Europe Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Japan Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure India Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Southeast Asia Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Armour Plate Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Figure Global Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) Table Global Armour Plate Sales of Key Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Sales Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Figure 2015 Armour Plate Sales Share by Manufacturers Figure 2016 Armour Plate Sales Share by Manufacturers Table Global Armour Plate Revenue by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2011-2016) Table 2015 Global Armour Plate Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table 2016 Global Armour Plate Revenue Share by Manufacturers Table Global Armour Plate Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Sales Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Armour Plate by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Armour Plate Sales Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Revenue Share by Type (2011-2016) Figure Revenue Market Share of Armour Plate by Type (2011-2016) Figure Global Armour Plate Revenue Growth Rate by Type (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Sales and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Sales Share by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Armour Plate by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Global Armour Plate Sales Growth Rate by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Revenue and Market Share by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Revenue Share by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Revenue Market Share of Armour Plate by Regions (2011-2016) Figure Global Armour Plate Revenue Growth Rate by Regions (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Sales and Market Share by Application (2011-2016) Table Global Armour Plate Sales Share by Application (2011-2016) Figure Sales Market Share of Armour Plate by Application (2011-2016) Figure Global Armour Plate Sales Growth Rate by Application (2011-2016) Figure USA Armour Plate Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2016) Figure USA Armour Plate Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2016) Figure USA Armour Plate Sales Price Trend (2011-2016) Table USA Armour Plate Sales by Manufacturers (2011-2016) FOR ANY QUERY, REACH US @ Armour Plate Global Sales Market Research Report 2016


This report studies sales (consumption) of Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe, Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering  Sandvik Construction  Blair Rubber Company  Polycorp Ltd.  West American Rubber Company, LLC  Metso Oyj  The Trelleborg Group  ContiTech AG  FLSmidth & Co. A/S  The Weir Group PLC  CERATIZIT S.A  REMA TIP TOP AG  Raptor Mining Products Inc.  Densit (ITW Engineered Polymers)  Kingfisher Industrial  Kalenborn International GmbH & Co. KG  WPE Wear Protection Engineering GmbH  TEGA Industries LTD  Bradken Limited  Fuller Industrial  Industrial Lining Inc  Xervon GmbH  ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions AG  Fluor Corporation  SNC-Lavalin Group  Nilos GmbH & Co. KG  Plant Maintenance Service Corporation  Sulzer Ltd.  Bilfinger SE  Thejo Engineering Limited  CeramTec GmbH Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  United States  China  Europe  Japan Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Ceramic  Rubber  Steel  Plastic Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems in each application, can be divided into  Transportation & Automotive  Oil and Gas  Iron and steel  Mining  Power Plants  Wood, Pulp and Paper  Construction  Others (Planer mills, Agriculture & farming, F&B, Marine) Global Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales Market Report 2016  1 Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems  1.2 Classification of Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems  1.2.1 Ceramic  1.2.2 Rubber  1.2.3 Steel  1.2.4 Plastic  1.3 Application of Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems  1.3.1 Transportation & Automotive  1.3.2 Oil and Gas  1.3.3 Iron and steel  1.3.4 Mining  1.3.5 Power Plants  1.3.6 Wood, Pulp and Paper  1.3.7 Construction  1.3.8 Others (Planer mills, Agriculture & farming, F&B, Marine)  1.4 Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Market by Regions  1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems (2011-2021)  1.5.1 Global Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)  1.5.2 Global Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 7 Global Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Manufacturers Analysis  7.1 Sandvik Construction  7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.1.2 Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Product Type, Application and Specification  7.1.2.1 Type I  7.1.2.2 Type II  7.1.3 Sandvik Construction Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.2 Blair Rubber Company  7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.2.2 128 Product Type, Application and Specification  7.2.2.1 Type I  7.2.2.2 Type II  7.2.3 Blair Rubber Company Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.3 Polycorp Ltd.  7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.3.2 143 Product Type, Application and Specification  7.3.2.1 Type I  7.3.2.2 Type II  7.3.3 Polycorp Ltd. Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.4 West American Rubber Company, LLC  7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.4.2 Nov Product Type, Application and Specification  7.4.2.1 Type I  7.4.2.2 Type II  7.4.3 West American Rubber Company, LLC Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.5 Metso Oyj  7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.5.2 Product Type, Application and Specification  7.5.2.1 Type I  7.5.2.2 Type II  7.5.3 Metso Oyj Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.6 The Trelleborg Group  7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.6.2 Million USD Product Type, Application and Specification  7.6.2.1 Type I  7.6.2.2 Type II  7.6.3 The Trelleborg Group Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.7 ContiTech AG  7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.7.2 Machinery & Equipment Product Type, Application and Specification  7.7.2.1 Type I  7.7.2.2 Type II  7.7.3 ContiTech AG Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.8 FLSmidth & Co. A/S  7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.8.2 Product Type, Application and Specification  7.8.2.1 Type I  7.8.2.2 Type II  7.8.3 FLSmidth & Co. A/S Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.9 The Weir Group PLC  7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.9.2 Product Type, Application and Specification  7.9.2.1 Type I  7.9.2.2 Type II  7.9.3 The Weir Group PLC Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.10 CERATIZIT S.A  7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors  7.10.2 Product Type, Application and Specification  7.10.2.1 Type I  7.10.2.2 Type II  7.10.3 CERATIZIT S.A Heavy Duty Wear Protection Systems Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview  7.11 REMA TIP TOP AG  7.12 Raptor Mining Products Inc.  7.13 Densit (ITW Engineered Polymers)  7.14 Kingfisher Industrial  7.15 Kalenborn International GmbH & Co. KG  7.16 WPE Wear Protection Engineering GmbH  7.17 TEGA Industries LTD  7.18 Bradken Limited  7.19 Fuller Industrial  7.20 Industrial Lining Inc  7.21 Xervon GmbH  7.22 ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions AG  7.23 Fluor Corporation  7.24 SNC-Lavalin Group  7.25 Nilos GmbH & Co. KG  7.26 Plant Maintenance Service Corporation  7.27 Sulzer Ltd.  7.28 Bilfinger SE  7.29 Thejo Engineering Limited  7.30 CeramTec GmbH


News Article | November 7, 2016
Site: www.newsmaker.com.au

This report studies Armour Plate in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering  SSAB  JFE  ThyssenKrupp  Dillinger  ESSAR Steel Algoma  Ruukki  ArcelorMittal  Bisalloy  Bradken  WUYANG Steel  BAOSTEEL  ANSTEEL  WISCO  Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Armour Plate in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like  North America  Europe  China  Japan  Southeast Asia  India For more information or any query mail at [email protected] Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into  Type I  Type II  Type III  Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Armour Plate in each application, can be divided into  Military  Armor cash carrier  Application 3 Global Armour Plate Market Research Report 2016  1 Armour Plate Market Overview  1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Armour Plate  1.2 Armour Plate Segment by Type  1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Armour Plate by Type in 2015  1.2.2 Type I  1.2.3 Type II  1.2.4 Type III  1.3 Armour Plate Segment by Application  1.3.1 Armour Plate Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015  1.3.2 Military  1.3.3 Armor cash carrier  1.3.4 Application 3  1.4 Armour Plate Market by Region  1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)  1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Armour Plate (2011-2021) 2 Global Armour Plate Market Competition by Manufacturers  2.1 Global Armour Plate Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.2 Global Armour Plate Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.3 Global Armour Plate Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)  2.4 Manufacturers Armour Plate Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type  2.5 Armour Plate Market Competitive Situation and Trends  2.5.1 Armour Plate Market Concentration Rate  2.5.2 Armour Plate Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers  2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Armour Plate Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2011-2016)  3.1 Global Armour Plate Production by Region (2011-2016)  3.2 Global Armour Plate Production Market Share by Region (2011-2016)  3.3 Global Armour Plate Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2011-2016)  3.4 Global Armour Plate Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.5 North America Armour Plate Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.6 Europe Armour Plate Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.7 China Armour Plate Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.8 Japan Armour Plate Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.9 Southeast Asia Armour Plate Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)  3.10 India Armour Plate Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 4 Global Armour Plate Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.1 Global Armour Plate Consumption by Regions (2011-2016)  4.2 North America Armour Plate Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.3 Europe Armour Plate Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.4 China Armour Plate Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.5 Japan Armour Plate Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.6 Southeast Asia Armour Plate Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016)  4.7 India Armour Plate Production, Consumption, Export, Import by Regions (2011-2016) 5 Global Armour Plate Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type  5.1 Global Armour Plate Production and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  5.2 Global Armour Plate Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)  5.3 Global Armour Plate Price by Type (2011-2016)  5.4 Global Armour Plate Production Growth by Type (2011-2016) For more information or any query mail at [email protected] Wise Guy Reports is part of the Wise Guy Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and offers premium progressive statistical surveying, market research reports, analysis & forecast data for industries and governments around the globe. Wise Guy Reports features an exhaustive list of market research reports from hundreds of publishers worldwide. We boast a database spanning virtually every market category and an even more comprehensive collection of market research reports under these categories and sub-categories.

Loading Bradken collaborators
Loading Bradken collaborators