Entity

Time filter

Source Type

Parkville, Australia

Jacobs S.E.,Neonatal Services | Jacobs S.E.,Critical Care and Neurosciences Group | Tobin J.M.,North West Academic Center | Donath S.,Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit | And 7 more authors.
Pediatrics | Year: 2013

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Late-onset sepsis frequently complicates prematurity, contributing to morbidity and mortality. Probiotics may reduce mortality and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm infants, with unclear effect on late-onset sepsis. This study aimed to determine the effect of administering a specific combination of probiotics to very preterm infants on culture-proven late-onset sepsis. METHODS: A prospective multicenter, double-blinded, placebocontrolled, randomized trial compared daily administration of a probiotic combination (Bifidobacterium infantis, Streptococcus thermophilus, and Bifidobacterium lactis, containing 1 3 109 total organisms) with placebo (maltodextrin) in infants born before 32 completed weeks' gestation weighing ,1500 g. The primary outcome was at least 1 episode of definite late-onset sepsis. RESULTS: Between October 2007 and November 2011, 1099 very preterm infants from Australia and New Zealand were randomized. Rates of definite late-onset sepsis (16.2%), NEC of Bell stage 2 or more (4.4%), and mortality (5.1%) were low in controls, with high breast milk feeding rates (96.9%). No significant difference in definite late-onset sepsis or all-cause mortality was found, but this probiotic combination reduced NEC of Bell stage 2 or more (2.0% versus 4.4%; relative risk 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.93, P = .03; number needed to treat 43, 95% confidence interval 23 to 333). CONCLUSIONS: The probiotics B infantis, S thermophilus, and B lactis significantly reduced NEC of Bell stage 2 or more in very preterm infants, but not definite late-onset sepsis or mortality. Treatment with this combination of probiotics appears to be safe. Pediatrics 2013;132:1055- 1062. © 2013 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Source


Hillman R.J.,University of Sydney | Van Leeuwen M.T.,University of New South Wales | Vajdic C.M.,University of New South Wales | McHugh L.,University of Sydney | And 7 more authors.
Sexual Health | Year: 2012

Background We report the prevalence and predictors for high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN) in community-based cohorts of HIV-negative and HIV-positive homosexual men in Sydney, Australia. Methods: A cross-sectional study of consecutive participants in both cohorts was performed in 2005 (204 HIV-negative and 128 HIV-positive men). Anal swabs collected by a research nurse underwent cytological analysis, using the ThinPrep procedure, and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. Participants who had cytological abnormalities other than low-grade squamous epithelial lesions (SIL) were referred for high resolution anoscopy (HRA). Results: A total of 114 men had cytological abnormalities (24.3% of HIV-negative and 57.5% of HIV-positive men, odds ratio (OR)≤4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.57-6.90). However, only three (2.3%) HIV-positive men and no HIV-negative men had high-grade SIL on anal cytology. Seventy-seven men were referred for HRA, of whom 63 (81.8%) attended. Histologically confirmed HGAIN was detected in 21 (33.3%). The prevalence of HGAIN was higher in HIV-positive men (10.8%) than in HIV-negative men (5.0%, OR≤2.29, 95% CI 0.93-5.63, P≤0.071). HGAIN was not related to age but was strongly associated with the detection of high-risk types of anal HPV (OR≤10.1, 95% CI 1.33-76.2) rather than low-risk types (OR≤1.97, 95% CI 0.74-5.25). Conclusion: HGAIN was prevalent in homosexual men across all age groups and was more than twice as common in HIV-positive men compared with HIV-negative men. The presence of high-risk anal HPV was highly predictive of HGAIN. Journal compilation CSIRO © 2012. Source


Hickey L.,Bio 21 Institute | Jacobs S.E.,Neonatal Services | Jacobs S.E.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute | Jacobs S.E.,University of Melbourne | And 3 more authors.
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health | Year: 2012

Probiotics are micro-organisms that confer health benefits on the host. Postulated mechanisms include: increasing resistance of the mucosal barrier to migration of bacteria and their toxins by strengthening intestinal cell junctions, modification of host response to microbial products, augmentation of immunoglobulin A mucosal responses, enhancement of enteral nutrition to inhibit the growth of pathogens; production of antimicrobial proteins; and competitive exclusion of potential pathogens. Published meta-analyses and systematic reviews report the effects of probiotics on important clinical outcomes in neonates. This paper will review the evidence for probiotic supplementation in neonatology, with a focus on preterm infants. © 2012 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (Royal Australasian College of Physicians). Source


Tabrizi S.N.,Bio 21 Institute | Tabrizi S.N.,University of Melbourne | Unemo M.,Orebro University | Limnios A.E.,Collaborating Center for | And 5 more authors.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology | Year: 2011

Molecular detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extragenital samples may result in false-positive results due to cross-reaction with commensal Neisseria species or Neisseria meningitidis. This study examined 450 characterized clinical culture isolates, comprising 216 N. gonorrhoeae isolates and 234 isolates of nongonococcal Neisseria species (n = 218) and 16 isolates of other closely related bacteria, with six commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). The six NAATs tested were Gen-Probe APTIMA COMBO 2 and APTIMA GC, Roche COBAS Amplicor CT/NG and COBAS 4800 CT/NG tests, BD ProbeTec GC Qx amplified DNA assay, and Abbott RealTime CT/NG test. All assays except COBAS Amplicor CT/NG test where four (1.9%) isolates were not detected showed a positive result with all N. gonorrhoeae isolates (n = 216). Among the 234 nongonococcal isolates examined, initial results from all assays displayed some false-positive results due to cross-reactions. Specifically, the COBAS Amplicor and ProbeTec tests showed the highest number of falsepositive results, detecting 33 (14.1%) and 26 (11%) nongonococcal Neisseria isolates, respectively. On the first testing, APTIMA COMBO 2, APTIMA GC, Abbott RealTime, and Roche COBAS 4800 showed lower level of cross-reactions with five (2.1%), four (1.7%), two (1%), and two (1%) of the isolates showing low-level positivity, respectively. Upon retesting of these nine nongonococcal isolates using freshly cultured colonies, none were positive by the APTIMA COMBO 2, Abbott RealTime, or COBAS 4800 test. In conclusion, the COBAS Amplicor and ProbeTec tests displayed high number of false-positive results, while the remaining NAATs showed only sporadic low-level false-positive results. Supplementary testing for confirmation of N. gonorrhoeae NAATs remains recommended with all samples tested, in particular those from extragenital sites. Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Source


Garland S.M.,Bio 21 Institute | Garland S.M.,University of Melbourne | Garland S.M.,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute | Tobin J.M.,University of Melbourne | And 12 more authors.
BMC Infectious Diseases | Year: 2011

Background: Late onset sepsis is a frequent complication of prematurity associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The commensal bacteria of the gastrointestinal tract play a key role in the development of healthy immune responses. Healthy term infants acquire these commensal organisms rapidly after birth. However, colonisation in preterm infants is adversely affected by delivery mode, antibiotic treatment and the intensive care environment. Altered microbiota composition may lead to increased colonisation with pathogenic bacteria, poor immune development and susceptibility to sepsis in the preterm infant.Probiotics are live microorganisms, which when administered in adequate amounts confer health benefits on the host. Amongst numerous bacteriocidal and nutritional roles, they may also favourably modulate host immune responses in local and remote tissues. Meta-analyses of probiotic supplementation in preterm infants report a reduction in mortality and necrotising enterocolitis. Studies with sepsis as an outcome have reported mixed results to date.Allergic diseases are increasing in incidence in "westernised" countries. There is evidence that probiotics may reduce the incidence of these diseases by altering the intestinal microbiota to influence immune function.Methods/Design: This is a multi-centre, randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled trial investigating supplementing preterm infants born at < 32 weeks' gestation weighing < 1500 g, with a probiotic combination (Bifidobacterium infantis, Streptococcus thermophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis). A total of 1,100 subjects are being recruited in Australia and New Zealand. Infants commence the allocated intervention from soon after the start of feeds until discharge home or term corrected age. The primary outcome is the incidence of at least one episode of definite (blood culture positive) late onset sepsis before 40 weeks corrected age or discharge home. Secondary outcomes include: Necrotising enterocolitis, mortality, antibiotic usage, time to establish full enteral feeds, duration of hospital stay, growth measurements at 6 and 12 months' corrected age and evidence of atopic conditions at 12 months' corrected age.Discussion: Results from previous studies on the use of probiotics to prevent diseases in preterm infants are promising. However, a large clinical trial is required to address outstanding issues regarding safety and efficacy in this vulnerable population. This study will address these important issues.Trial registration: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR): ACTRN012607000144415. The product "ABC Dophilus Probiotic Powder for Infants®", Solgar, USA has its 3 probiotics strains registered with the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures) as BB-12 15954, B-02 96579, Th-4 15957. © 2011 Garland et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Source

Discover hidden collaborations