Entity

Time filter

Source Type

Kopparberg, Sweden

Three metal-rich, acidic mine waters (from Bersbo and Ljusnarsberg, Sweden) were mixed with alkaline fly ash leachates in various proportions, representing a pH titration. Changes in pH and the loss of metals in solution due to precipitation of solid phases were tracked. Mineral equilibria and changes in pH and alkalinity were simulated using the geochemical code PHREEQC and the MINTEQv4 database, and the measured and simulated pH responses were compared. The formation of solid precipitates corresponded to fairly well-defined pH-buffering regions, reflecting the mine water compositions (notably the levels of Fe, Al, and Mn). Zn precipitation had a distinct buffering effect at near-neutral pH for the mine waters not dominated by iron. The formation of solid Mg phases (carbonate, as well as hydroxide) was indicated at high pH (above 9), but not formation of solid Ca phases, despite high sulfate levels. The phases that precipitated were various amorphous mixtures, mostly of the metals Fe, Al, Mn, Zn, and Mg. For the Fe-rich mine water, pH was poorly simulated with a simple MIX model, while alkalinity predictions agreed reasonably well with measured data. For the Al-rich mine waters, the simulated pH responses agreed well with the measurements. In an additional step, geochemical simulations were performed where selected proxy phases for major elements were forced to precipitate; this significantly improved the pH and alkalinity predictions. This approach may be more efficient than performing mixing experiments and titrations. © 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Source


Sartz L.,Bergskraft Bergslagen AB | Sartz L.,Orebro University | Backstrom M.,Bergskraft Bergslagen AB | Backstrom M.,Orebro University
Mine Water and the Environment | Year: 2013

Bone meal was used to treat two different mine waters: acidic (pH 4.5) mine water containing high concentrations of Fe and Al and neutral/slightly alkaline (pH 7) mine water. Original primary contaminants in both waters were Pb and Zn. The contaminants were dissolved in the acidic mine water and mostly suspended in the neutral mine water. Flow through the filter treating the acidic mine water was relatively low (0.1 L/min), but increased towards the end of the test period. Removal of Pb and Cu was very good in the acidic mine water (around 80 %); removal of Zn was slightly less (60 %) due to the final pH (≈6-6.5). Flow through the filter treating the neutral mine water was initially significantly higher (5 L/min) and the removal of Pb and Zn was less compared to the acidic mine water (50 % for Pb and 35 % for Zn). The major reason for the difference in metal removal in the two mine waters was the difference in Fe and Al sorption sites, flow rate, and pH; in order for the bone meal to dissolve and form metal phosphate, the pH has to be <7. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Source

Discover hidden collaborations