Meijwaard S.C.,Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care |
Kikkert M.,Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care |
De Mooij L.D.,Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care |
Lommerse N.M.,Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care |
And 8 more authors.
PLoS ONE | Year: 2015
Background: Crime victimisation is a serious problem in psychiatric patients. However, research has focused on patients with severe mental illness and few studies exist that address victimisation in other outpatient groups, such as patients with depression. Due to large differences in methodology of the studies that address crime victimisation, a comparison of prevalence between psychiatric diagnostic groups is hard to make. Objectives of this study were to determine and compare one-year prevalence of violent and non-violent criminal victimisation among outpatients from different diagnostic psychiatric groups and to examine prevalence differences with the general population. Method: Criminal victimisation prevalence was measured in 300 outpatients living in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with outpatients with depressive disorder (n = 102), substance use disorder (SUD, n = 106) and severe mental illness (SMI, n = 92) using a National Crime Victimisation Survey, and compared with a matched general population sample (n = 10865). Results: Of all outpatients, 61% reported experiencing some kind of victimisation over the past year; 33% reported violent victimisation (3.5 times more than the general population) and 36% reported property crimes (1.2 times more than the general population). Outpatients with depression (67%) and SUD (76%) were victimised more often than SMI outpatients (39%). Younger age and hostile behaviour were associated with violent victimisation, while being male and living alone were associated with non-violent victimisation. Moreover, SUD was associated with both violent and non-violent victimisation. Conclusion: Outpatients with depression, SUD, and SMI are at increased risk of victimisation compared to the general population. Furthermore, our results indicate that victimisation of violent and non-violent crimes is more common in outpatients with depression and SUD than in outpatients with SMI living independently in the community. © 2015 Meijwaard et al.
Costa D.,University of Porto |
Matanov A.,Queen Mary, University of London |
Canavan R.,National University of Ireland |
Gabor E.,National Institute for Health Development |
And 12 more authors.
BMC Health Services Research | Year: 2014
Background: Different service characteristics are known to influence mental health care delivery. Much less is known about the impact of contextual factors, such as the socioeconomic circumstances, on the provision of care to socially marginalized groups.The objectives of this work were to assess the organisational characteristics of services providing mental health care for marginalized groups in 14 European capital cities and to explore the associations between organisational quality, service features and country-level characteristics. Methods. 617 services were assessed in two highly deprived areas in 14 European capital cities. A Quality Index of Service Organisation (QISO) was developed and applied across all sites. Service characteristics and country level socioeconomic indicators were tested and related with the Index using linear regressions and random intercept linear models. Results: The mean (standard deviation) of the QISO score (minimum = 0; maximum = 15) varied from 8.63 (2.23) in Ireland to 12.40 (2.07) in Hungary. The number of different programmes provided was the only service characteristic significantly correlated with the QISO (p < 0.05). The national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was inversely associated with the QISO. Nearly 15% of the variance of the QISO was attributed to country-level variables, with GDP explaining 12% of this variance. Conclusions: Socioeconomic contextual factors, in particular the national GDP are likely to influence the organisational quality of services providing mental health care for marginalized groups. Such factors should be considered in international comparative studies. Their significance for different types of services should be explored in further research. © 2014 Costa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Goedhard L.E.,Altrecht Institute for Mental Health Care |
Goedhard L.E.,Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical science UIPS |
Stolker J.J.,Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical science UIPS |
Stolker J.J.,Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care |
And 7 more authors.
Pharmacopsychiatry | Year: 2010
Introduction: In a previous review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the pharmacotherapeutic management of aggression, it was shown that there is only weak evidence of effectiveness. In the present study we aim to determine comparability of patients included in these RCTs and patients of psychiatric long-stay wards. Methods: Exclusion criteria that were used in at least 20% of the RCTs were applied to a sample of aggressive inpatients from clinical practice, in order to find what proportion of these patients would be eligible to participate in the reviewed, high quality RCTs. Results: Only 30% of aggressive psychiatric patients as seen in clinical practice would be eligible to participate in a typical randomized controlled trial based on the most frequently applied exclusion criteria. Discussion: The low comparability of patients included in RCTs with those seen in clinical practice may decrease the generalizability of the findings form RCTs to clinical practice. © 2010 Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York.
Scheifes A.,Altrecht Institute for Mental Health Care |
Scheifes A.,Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical science |
Stolker J.J.,Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical science |
Stolker J.J.,Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care |
And 6 more authors.
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research | Year: 2011
Background Behavioural problems are common in people with intellectual disability (ID) and are often treated with antipsychotics. Aim To establish the frequency and characteristics of people with ID included in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on antipsychotic treatment for behavioural problems, and to investigate the quality of these RCTs. Methods A literature search in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane was performed and reviewed. Results People with ID participated in 27 of the 100 included RCTs. The RCTs were of good quality but smaller compared with trials in patients with dementia or schizophrenia (average sample sizes=55, 124 and 374). In 13/27 trials no clear definition of ID was given. Over 25 different outcome measures were used to assess behavioural problems. Conclusions Studies in which people with ID are included are of a sufficient quality, but of a small size. The heterogeneity in the characteristics of the ID population included as well as in the applied assessment instruments makes performing meta-analyses unfeasible. © 2010 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.