Toulouse, France
Toulouse, France

Time filter

Source Type

This report studies sales (consumption) of Electronic Nose in United States market, focuses on the top players, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player, covering Split by product types, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Electronic Nose in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: http://globalqyresearch.com/united-states-electronic-nose-market-report-2016 United States Electronic Nose Market Report 2016 1 Electronic Nose Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Electronic Nose 1.2 Classification of Electronic Nose 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Electronic Nose 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 United States Market Size Sales (Value) and Revenue (Volume) of Electronic Nose (2011-2021) 1.4.1 United States Electronic Nose Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.4.2 United States Electronic Nose Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 5 United States Electronic Nose Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 5.1 Airsense Analytics GmbH 5.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 5.1.2 Electronic Nose Product Type, Application and Specification 5.1.2.1 Type I 5.1.2.2 Type II 5.1.3 Airsense Analytics GmbH Electronic Nose Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.2 Alpha MOS SA 5.2.2 Electronic Nose Product Type, Application and Specification 5.2.2.1 Type I 5.2.2.2 Type II 5.2.3 Alpha MOS SA Electronic Nose Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.3 Smiths Detection Inc. 5.3.2 Electronic Nose Product Type, Application and Specification 5.3.2.1 Type I 5.3.2.2 Type II 5.3.3 Smiths Detection Inc. Electronic Nose Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.4 Electronic Sensor Technology 5.4.2 Electronic Nose Product Type, Application and Specification 5.4.2.1 Type I 5.4.2.2 Type II 5.4.3 Electronic Sensor Technology Electronic Nose Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.5 Gerstel 5.5.2 Electronic Nose Product Type, Application and Specification 5.5.2.1 Type I 5.5.2.2 Type II 5.5.3 Gerstel Electronic Nose Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 5.6 Brechbuhler 5.6.2 Electronic Nose Product Type, Application and Specification 5.6.2.1 Type I 5.6.2.2 Type II 5.6.3 Brechbuhler Electronic Nose Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 5.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview Global QYResearch is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.


News Article | February 16, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

This report studies sales (consumption) of Digital Scent Technology in Global market, especially in United States, China, Europe and Japan, focuses on top players in these regions/countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these regions, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Digital Scent Technology in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like Split by product Types, with sales, revenue, price and gross margin, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into E-nose Scent synthesizer Split by applications, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Digital Scent Technology in each application, can be divided into Entertainment Education Healthcare Food & Beverage Other Global Digital Scent Technology Sales Market Report 2017 1 Digital Scent Technology Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Digital Scent Technology 1.2 Classification of Digital Scent Technology 1.2.1 E-nose 1.2.2 Scent synthesizer 1.3 Application of Digital Scent Technology 1.3.1 Entertainment 1.3.2 Education 1.3.3 Healthcare 1.3.4 Food & Beverage 1.3.5 Other 1.4 Digital Scent Technology Market by Regions 1.4.1 United States Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value and Volume) of Digital Scent Technology (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Global Digital Scent Technology Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Global Digital Scent Technology Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 9 Global Digital Scent Technology Manufacturers Analysis 9.1 Alpha MOS 9.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.1.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.1.2.1 E-nose 9.1.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.1.3 Alpha MOS Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.2 Electronics Sensor Technology 9.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.2.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.2.2.1 E-nose 9.2.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.2.3 Electronics Sensor Technology Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.3 AIRSENSE Analytics 9.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.3.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.3.2.1 E-nose 9.3.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.3.3 AIRSENSE Analytics Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.4 Owlstone 9.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.4.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.4.2.1 E-nose 9.4.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.4.3 Owlstone Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.5 Owlstone 9.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.5.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.5.2.1 E-nose 9.5.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.5.3 Owlstone Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.6 Scent Sciences 9.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.6.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.6.2.1 E-nose 9.6.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.6.3 Scent Sciences Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.7 G.A.S. 9.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.7.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.7.2.1 E-nose 9.7.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.7.3 G.A.S. Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 9.8 Sensigent 9.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 9.8.2 Digital Scent Technology Product Type, Application and Specification 9.8.2.1 E-nose 9.8.2.2 Scent synthesizer 9.8.3 Sensigent Digital Scent Technology Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 9.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview For more information, please visit https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/901055-global-digital-scent-technology-sales-market-report-2017


— Global Chemical Sensors Market (Optical, Electrochemical, Biochemical) Analysis By Type, By Application, By Region, By Country (2016-2021) report says Global Chemical Sensors market is projected to exhibit a CAGR of 10.15% during 2016 - 2021. Global Chemical Sensors Market has been segmented on basis of Type (Electrochemical, Optical Chemical, Biochemical and Other); By Application (Medical, Automotive, Environmental Monitoring and Other); By Region (North America, Europe, APAC and ROW) and By Country (U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany, China, India, Japan, Brazil and Saudi Arabia). Browse 134 Figures, 10 Companies, spread across 162 pages available at http://www.reportsnreports.com/reports/750657-global-chemical-sensors-market-optical-electrochemical-biochemical-analysis-by-type-by-application-by-region-by-country-2016-2021-by-type-electrochemical-optical-chemical-biochemical-and-other-by-di-arabia.html. Electrochemical sensors hold the major percentage share in the total chemical sensors market, biochemical sensor is projected to display a faster growth in the future owing to the increasing diabetes prevalence in the population coupled with growing home &point-of-care testing and monitoring tools demand. Among the regions, APAC is predicted to advance at the highest rate, mainly driven by the pouring number of vehicle production, growing healthcare infrastructure and shift of manufacturing facilities in low-cost countries in the region. Global Chemical Sensors Market is forecasted to grow at a CAGR of 10.15% during 2016 – 2021. The strong growth in Chemical Sensors industry is driven by the surging demand from medical and automotive sectors. Apart from that, the uncovering of the wide range of applications in allied industries including chemical processing, food & beverage processing, environmental sector and defense has been impelling growth in the chemical sensors market. A comprehensive research report created through extensive primary research (inputs from industry experts, companies, stakeholders) and secondary research, the report aims to present the analysis of global Chemical Sensors market on the basis of Type (Electrochemical, Optical Chemical, Biochemical and Other); By Application (Medical, Automotive, Environmental Monitoring and Other); By Region (North America, Europe, APAC and ROW) and By Country (U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany, China, India, Japan, Brazil and Saudi Arabia). Scope of the Chemical Sensors Market Report By Type: Electrochemical Sensors, Optical Chemical Sensors, Biochemical Sensors, Others By Application: Medical, Automotive, Environmental Monitoring, Other By Region: North America, Europe, APAC, ROW By Country: US, Canada, Germany, U.K., China, India, Japan, Brazil, Saudi Arabia Company Profiling are Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Emerson Electric Co., HORIBA, Ltd., Siemens AG, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated., Smith’s Group plc., Nova Biomedical Corporation, Alpha MOS, Figaro Engineering Inc. and RAE Systems. Table of Contents 1. Research Methodology 2. Executive Summary 3. Strategic Recommendation 4. Chemical Sensors Overview 5. Global Chemical Sensors Market: Growth and Forecast 6. Global Chemical Sensors Market, By Type (Electro Chemical, Optical Chemical, Bio Chemical and Other) 7. Global Chemical Sensors Market-By Application (Medical, Automotive, Environmental and Other) 8. Global Chemical Sensors Market: Regional Analysis 9. Market Dynamics 10. Market Trends 11. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis – Chemical Sensors Market 12. SWOT Analysis – Chemical Sensors Market 13. Competitive Landscape 14. Policy and Regulatory Landscape 15. Company Profiling About Us ReportsnReports.com is your single source for all market research needs. Our database includes 500,000+ market research reports from over 95 leading global publishers & in-depth market research studies of over 5000 micro markets. For more information, please visit http://www.reportsnreports.com/reports/750657-global-chemical-sensors-market-optical-electrochemical-biochemical-analysis-by-type-by-application-by-region-by-country-2016-2021-by-type-electrochemical-optical-chemical-biochemical-and-other-by-di-arabia.html


Le Vot C.,University Pierre and Marie Curie | Afonso C.,University Pierre and Marie Curie | Beaugrand C.,Alpha Mos | Tabet J.-C.,University Pierre and Marie Curie
International Journal of Mass Spectrometry | Year: 2011

A Qh-FT-ICR equipped with an electrospray source has been recently coupled, in our laboratory, with a metastable atom bombardment (MAB) source. In this Penning ionization source, the gas phase sample is bombarded with a beam of metastable atoms in vacuum. Compared to EI, the MAB source allows the control of the internal energy and selective ionization by the use of different gases (rare gases and N2). The FT-ICR provides accurate mass measurements thanks to its ultra-high resolution. After the adaptation of the MAB/EI source and its implementation in the FT-ICR instrument, several optimizations were carried out in order to obtain a detectable signal. The ion beam generated by the dual MAB/EI source was characterized through the study of ion kinetic energy distribution. The FTICR instrument was equipped initially with ESI source and ion funnel optics. The design of the optic lenses and applied potentials used for ions transmission from the homemade EI/MAB dual source to the ESI optics was developed using SIMION simulations. The RF and DC potentials applied to the ion funnels were tuned in order to achieve transmission of low m/z ions with a pressure of 10-3 mBar compared to the 1 mBar used in normal ESI operation. © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Patent
Alpha M.O.S. and French National Center for Scientific Research | Date: 2012-12-12

A multi-storey gas sensor is constructed by stacking chemoresistor type gas sensing elements (CH1,CH2) and providing holes through each sensing element, at least in the region where the sensing layer (52) is formed, so that gas can pass from one sensing element to the next, through the sensing layers (52). A rich set of measurements can be obtained, enabling the characterisation/analysis of a gas under test with increased accuracy and/or the tailoring of the measurements to the particular gas-sensing application: notably by selecting appropriate combinations of materials for the sensing layers of the different gas-sensing elements and by varying the operating conditions applicable to the different gas-sensing elements notably by: taking measurements at respective times when different combinations of sensing layers in the stack are activated, at times when given sensing layers are heated to different temperatures or according to different heating profiles, and/or when selected sensing layers are exposed to UV light. Sensor sensitivity and selectivity can be increased by applying UV pulses of controlled duration. For miniaturization, and increased measurement-speed, each sensing element (CH1,CH2) may have a micro-hotplate architecture.


Maniruzzaman M.,University of Greenwich | Boateng J.S.,University of Greenwich | Bonnefille M.,Alpha M.O.S. | Aranyos A.,Alpha M.O.S. | And 2 more authors.
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics | Year: 2012

The purpose of this study was the in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the masking efficiency of hot melt extruded paracetamol (PMOL) formulations. Extruded granules containing high PMOL loadings in Eudragit EPO® (EPO) or Kollidon® VA64 (VA64) were prepared by hot-melt extrusion (HME). The taste masking effect of the processed formulation was evaluated in vivo by a panel of six healthy human volunteers. In addition, in vitro evaluation was carried out by an Astree e-tongue equipped with seven sensors. Taste sensing technology demonstrated taste improvement for both polymers by correlating the data obtained for the placebo polymers and the pure APIs alone. The best masking effect was observed for VA64 at 30% PMOL loading. The e-tongue results were in good agreement with the in vivo evaluation. In vitro dissolution of the extruded granules showed rapid PMOL releases. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Food & Beverage companies need to design new products rapidly and constantly, having greater health benefits without changing taste or flavor nor increasing costs. To test sensory attributes, electronic sensory instruments can be used. This article presents 3 major applications of the electronic tongue in sensory profiling, taste benchmarking during product development and process monitoring based on taste. Over comparing 14 balsamic vinegars, it was observed that commercial brands were significantly different from traditional products. Traditional vinegars had equivalent saltiness whereas higher differences were perceptible between commercial products. The traditional vinegar with the highest level of quality showed lower sourness and umami taste. With the aim to re-develop an orange nectar, a prototype formulation was compared to two targets (competitive nectar and natural orange juice). This allowed to validate that the prototype better matched the competitive product than the current nectar of the supplier. To check that texture agents addition had no impact on the taste of 3 types of curry sauces, the electronic tongue was used to assess the products without and with additive. The instrument determined that on Green curry sauce, no significant taste change was observed, whereas for Red and Masaman curry, taste modification was perceptible.


Patent
Alpha M.O.S. | Date: 2016-11-09

The invention relates to a method (200) for the identification of an analyte in a sample fluid sensed by at least two sensors of different types. Sensors of different types may comprise gas chromatography sensors, CMOS gas sensors, or a combination thereof. In a first step, the two sensors provide a first and a second set of measured values (210) comprising at least one peak of a physical parameter representative of the concentration of the analyte, said physical parameter varying according to parameters like time, temperature, or wavelength. The method further comprises a step (220) of accessing a database of reference values, for example the NIST database. Said database contains reference values of parameters at which a peak occurs for an analyte. In the next step (230) the database is searched for reference values which are close to the measured values of the two different types of sensors and analytes whose reference values match the experimental values for two different types of sensors are identified.


Patent
Alpha M.O.S. | Date: 2016-08-31

The invention discloses a device for identifying fluids or measuring their concentration. The device is configured to capture fluid sensing signals and sent to processing capabilities to be annotated, pre-processed and fed to databases of datasets and models which have learning capabilities. The device has a stick or stylus form factor which is makes it fit to be used by health care professionals or by the general public. Advantageously, the stick can be used to capture data from gas and liquid, being possibly phases of the same analyte. The device can be a package containing all processing capabilities being configured to be autonomous. It can operate in conjunction with an intermediary device of a smart phone, a PC or a POCT type. The system comprising autonomous fluid sensory devices, intermediary devices and database servers can operate in a learning mode or in a use mode. Measurements can be filtered, and normalized to statistically eliminate the differences in measurements due to bad operational conditions, differences of device configurations or differences of local parameters (temperature, hygrometry, flow rate, etc...)


Trademark
Alpha M.O.S. | Date: 2010-05-25

Chromatography apparatus for laboratory use, for quality control at the plant level for on-field use, namely, apparatus and Instruments for chromatographic analysis: electronic systems comprising electronic sensors, detectors for the detection, study, analysis and recognition of odors, volatile substances, tastes and flavors.

Loading Alpha MOS collaborators
Loading Alpha MOS collaborators