Petersen Z.,Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Unit ADARU |
Nilsson M.,Umea University |
Steyn K.,University of Cape Town |
Emmelin M.,Lund University
Midwifery | Year: 2013
Introduction: previous research has suggested that pregnant women prefer a person-centred approach for smoking cessation interventions. However few studies have illustrated the mechanism through which such an approach has an influence on quitting or reduction rates among pregnant women in resource poor settings. Purpose: to explore the role of different components included in a smoking cessation intervention delivered to disadvantaged pregnant women with high smoking rates attending public health antenatal clinics in South Africa. Methods: a qualitative design consisting of focus-group discussion with women exposed to the intervention was used. Women were purposively selected from four antenatal clinics and one tertiary hospital to represent different experiences of the intervention. Focus group discussions with four groups of smokers and four groups of quitters were conducted and a total of 41 women were interviewed. Data were analysed using content analysis. Main findings: the main theme describing the intervention effect that emerged from the interviews was, 'Making identification with change possible'. The categories 'An impulse for change', 'An achievable recipe', 'A physical reminder' and 'A compassionate companion' further described how each intervention component was perceived by women and how it contributed to behaviour change. Conclusions: behaviour change interventions that are directly informed by the target population with regards to its design, content and delivery offer great opportunities for positive behaviour change. Women positively evaluated all the components employed in this intervention but rated the social support they received from peer-counsellors as the overriding aspect of the intervention. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Parry C.,Stellenbosch University |
Burnhams N.H.,Alcohol and Drug Abuse Research Unit ADARU |
London L.,University of Cape Town
South African Medical Journal | Year: 2012
Evidence from burden of disease and economic costing studies amply indicate that the public health burden from hazardous and harmful use of alcohol in South Africa warrants drastic action. Evidence that banning alcohol advertising is likely to be an effective intervention is reflected in WHO strategy documents on non-communicable diseases and harmful use of alcohol. Studies on young people furthermore support arguments refuting the claim that advertising only influences brand choice. Given the weakness of relying on industry self-regulation, the government is considering legislation to ban alcohol advertising, resulting in heated debate. Tobacco control and studies investigating the effect of alcohol advertising bans on consumption and alcoholrelated deaths point to the effectiveness of such action - ideally supplemented by other policy interventions. Arguments against an advertising ban include possible communication sector job losses, but these are likely to have been exaggerated. Banning alcohol advertising will necessitate greater scrutiny of digital media, satellite television and merchandising to reduce the likelihood of subverting the ban.