Redmond, WA, United States
Redmond, WA, United States

Time filter

Source Type

STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss., May 04, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerojet Rocketdyne, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AJRD), recently conducted hot-fire tests to validate the design of the preburner for the AR1 rocket engine, which represents the nation’s lowest-risk, lowest-cost-to-the-taxpayer and fastest path to replacing the Russian-built RD-180 engine currently used to launch most U.S. national security payloads into space. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ea1d6ba5-5369-4e8f-8a5c-90afcd0a64f6. “This important milestone keeps AR1 squarely on track for flight readiness in 2019,” said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. “Our proven design process and demonstrated manufacturing approaches are key contributors to Aerojet Rocketdyne’s unmatched record of mission success. When replacing the Russian-made engines on current launch vehicles, mission success has to be the country’s number one priority.” The preburner, a critical component that drives the engine’s turbomachinery, was built using state-of-the-art techniques, including 3-D printing which features Aerojet Rocketdyne’s proprietary Mondaloy™ high-strength, burn resistant nickel-based super alloy. With the design now confirmed, Aerojet Rocket has cleared one of the major technological hurdles to fulfill the congressional mandate to end U.S. dependence on Russian engine technology for military launches. “Due to the hot, oxygen-rich environment inside a staged combustion engine like the AR1, burn resistant materials are necessary to ensure safe operation of the engine under all conditions,” said Julie Van Kleeck, vice president of Advanced Space and Launch Programs and Strategy. “Mondaloy 200™ alloy is the perfect material to use in the AR1, particularly when combined with 3-D printing, because it eliminates the need for exotic metal coatings currently used in the Russian-made RD-180 engine that the AR1 is designed to replace.” The AR1 engine development is using the same rigorous methodology the company has used for its previous successful engine development programs, such as the RS-68, J-2X, RL10, and RS-25. Prior to full engine testing, the company is testing critical components and systems to validate the flight designs, ensuring that they are each robust prior to completing the flight engine design. Hundreds of component and subsystem tests along with manufacturing demonstrations have already occurred on the AR1 engine in advance of full engine testing. This approach minimizes changes once engine-level testing begins. The engine design team has now successfully completed a series of 22 component Critical Design Reviews leading up to an engine system Critical Design Review to support engine qualification and certification in 2019. Aerojet Rocketdyne is an innovative company delivering solutions that create value for its customers in the aerospace and defense markets. The company is a world-recognized aerospace and defense leader that provides propulsion and energetics to the space, missile defense and strategic systems, tactical systems and armaments areas, in support of domestic and international markets. Additional information about Aerojet Rocketdyne can be obtained by visiting our websites at www.Rocket.com and www.AerojetRocketdyne.com.


STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss., May 04, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerojet Rocketdyne, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AJRD), recently conducted hot-fire tests to validate the design of the preburner for the AR1 rocket engine, which represents the nation’s lowest-risk, lowest-cost-to-the-taxpayer and fastest path to replacing the Russian-built RD-180 engine currently used to launch most U.S. national security payloads into space. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ea1d6ba5-5369-4e8f-8a5c-90afcd0a64f6. “This important milestone keeps AR1 squarely on track for flight readiness in 2019,” said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. “Our proven design process and demonstrated manufacturing approaches are key contributors to Aerojet Rocketdyne’s unmatched record of mission success. When replacing the Russian-made engines on current launch vehicles, mission success has to be the country’s number one priority.” The preburner, a critical component that drives the engine’s turbomachinery, was built using state-of-the-art techniques, including 3-D printing which features Aerojet Rocketdyne’s proprietary Mondaloy™ high-strength, burn resistant nickel-based super alloy. With the design now confirmed, Aerojet Rocket has cleared one of the major technological hurdles to fulfill the congressional mandate to end U.S. dependence on Russian engine technology for military launches. “Due to the hot, oxygen-rich environment inside a staged combustion engine like the AR1, burn resistant materials are necessary to ensure safe operation of the engine under all conditions,” said Julie Van Kleeck, vice president of Advanced Space and Launch Programs and Strategy. “Mondaloy 200™ alloy is the perfect material to use in the AR1, particularly when combined with 3-D printing, because it eliminates the need for exotic metal coatings currently used in the Russian-made RD-180 engine that the AR1 is designed to replace.” The AR1 engine development is using the same rigorous methodology the company has used for its previous successful engine development programs, such as the RS-68, J-2X, RL10, and RS-25. Prior to full engine testing, the company is testing critical components and systems to validate the flight designs, ensuring that they are each robust prior to completing the flight engine design. Hundreds of component and subsystem tests along with manufacturing demonstrations have already occurred on the AR1 engine in advance of full engine testing. This approach minimizes changes once engine-level testing begins. The engine design team has now successfully completed a series of 22 component Critical Design Reviews leading up to an engine system Critical Design Review to support engine qualification and certification in 2019. Aerojet Rocketdyne is an innovative company delivering solutions that create value for its customers in the aerospace and defense markets. The company is a world-recognized aerospace and defense leader that provides propulsion and energetics to the space, missile defense and strategic systems, tactical systems and armaments areas, in support of domestic and international markets. Additional information about Aerojet Rocketdyne can be obtained by visiting our websites at www.Rocket.com and www.AerojetRocketdyne.com.


STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss., May 04, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerojet Rocketdyne, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AJRD), recently conducted hot-fire tests to validate the design of the preburner for the AR1 rocket engine, which represents the nation’s lowest-risk, lowest-cost-to-the-taxpayer and fastest path to replacing the Russian-built RD-180 engine currently used to launch most U.S. national security payloads into space. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ea1d6ba5-5369-4e8f-8a5c-90afcd0a64f6. “This important milestone keeps AR1 squarely on track for flight readiness in 2019,” said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. “Our proven design process and demonstrated manufacturing approaches are key contributors to Aerojet Rocketdyne’s unmatched record of mission success. When replacing the Russian-made engines on current launch vehicles, mission success has to be the country’s number one priority.” The preburner, a critical component that drives the engine’s turbomachinery, was built using state-of-the-art techniques, including 3-D printing which features Aerojet Rocketdyne’s proprietary Mondaloy™ high-strength, burn resistant nickel-based super alloy. With the design now confirmed, Aerojet Rocket has cleared one of the major technological hurdles to fulfill the congressional mandate to end U.S. dependence on Russian engine technology for military launches. “Due to the hot, oxygen-rich environment inside a staged combustion engine like the AR1, burn resistant materials are necessary to ensure safe operation of the engine under all conditions,” said Julie Van Kleeck, vice president of Advanced Space and Launch Programs and Strategy. “Mondaloy 200™ alloy is the perfect material to use in the AR1, particularly when combined with 3-D printing, because it eliminates the need for exotic metal coatings currently used in the Russian-made RD-180 engine that the AR1 is designed to replace.” The AR1 engine development is using the same rigorous methodology the company has used for its previous successful engine development programs, such as the RS-68, J-2X, RL10, and RS-25. Prior to full engine testing, the company is testing critical components and systems to validate the flight designs, ensuring that they are each robust prior to completing the flight engine design. Hundreds of component and subsystem tests along with manufacturing demonstrations have already occurred on the AR1 engine in advance of full engine testing. This approach minimizes changes once engine-level testing begins. The engine design team has now successfully completed a series of 22 component Critical Design Reviews leading up to an engine system Critical Design Review to support engine qualification and certification in 2019. Aerojet Rocketdyne is an innovative company delivering solutions that create value for its customers in the aerospace and defense markets. The company is a world-recognized aerospace and defense leader that provides propulsion and energetics to the space, missile defense and strategic systems, tactical systems and armaments areas, in support of domestic and international markets. Additional information about Aerojet Rocketdyne can be obtained by visiting our websites at www.Rocket.com and www.AerojetRocketdyne.com.


STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss., May 04, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerojet Rocketdyne, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AJRD), recently conducted hot-fire tests to validate the design of the preburner for the AR1 rocket engine, which represents the nation’s lowest-risk, lowest-cost-to-the-taxpayer and fastest path to replacing the Russian-built RD-180 engine currently used to launch most U.S. national security payloads into space. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ea1d6ba5-5369-4e8f-8a5c-90afcd0a64f6. “This important milestone keeps AR1 squarely on track for flight readiness in 2019,” said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. “Our proven design process and demonstrated manufacturing approaches are key contributors to Aerojet Rocketdyne’s unmatched record of mission success. When replacing the Russian-made engines on current launch vehicles, mission success has to be the country’s number one priority.” The preburner, a critical component that drives the engine’s turbomachinery, was built using state-of-the-art techniques, including 3-D printing which features Aerojet Rocketdyne’s proprietary Mondaloy™ high-strength, burn resistant nickel-based super alloy. With the design now confirmed, Aerojet Rocket has cleared one of the major technological hurdles to fulfill the congressional mandate to end U.S. dependence on Russian engine technology for military launches. “Due to the hot, oxygen-rich environment inside a staged combustion engine like the AR1, burn resistant materials are necessary to ensure safe operation of the engine under all conditions,” said Julie Van Kleeck, vice president of Advanced Space and Launch Programs and Strategy. “Mondaloy 200™ alloy is the perfect material to use in the AR1, particularly when combined with 3-D printing, because it eliminates the need for exotic metal coatings currently used in the Russian-made RD-180 engine that the AR1 is designed to replace.” The AR1 engine development is using the same rigorous methodology the company has used for its previous successful engine development programs, such as the RS-68, J-2X, RL10, and RS-25. Prior to full engine testing, the company is testing critical components and systems to validate the flight designs, ensuring that they are each robust prior to completing the flight engine design. Hundreds of component and subsystem tests along with manufacturing demonstrations have already occurred on the AR1 engine in advance of full engine testing. This approach minimizes changes once engine-level testing begins. The engine design team has now successfully completed a series of 22 component Critical Design Reviews leading up to an engine system Critical Design Review to support engine qualification and certification in 2019. Aerojet Rocketdyne is an innovative company delivering solutions that create value for its customers in the aerospace and defense markets. The company is a world-recognized aerospace and defense leader that provides propulsion and energetics to the space, missile defense and strategic systems, tactical systems and armaments areas, in support of domestic and international markets. Additional information about Aerojet Rocketdyne can be obtained by visiting our websites at www.Rocket.com and www.AerojetRocketdyne.com.


STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss., May 04, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Aerojet Rocketdyne, a subsidiary of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AJRD), recently conducted hot-fire tests to validate the design of the preburner for the AR1 rocket engine, which represents the nation’s lowest-risk, lowest-cost-to-the-taxpayer and fastest path to replacing the Russian-built RD-180 engine currently used to launch most U.S. national security payloads into space. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ea1d6ba5-5369-4e8f-8a5c-90afcd0a64f6. “This important milestone keeps AR1 squarely on track for flight readiness in 2019,” said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. “Our proven design process and demonstrated manufacturing approaches are key contributors to Aerojet Rocketdyne’s unmatched record of mission success. When replacing the Russian-made engines on current launch vehicles, mission success has to be the country’s number one priority.” The preburner, a critical component that drives the engine’s turbomachinery, was built using state-of-the-art techniques, including 3-D printing which features Aerojet Rocketdyne’s proprietary Mondaloy™ high-strength, burn resistant nickel-based super alloy. With the design now confirmed, Aerojet Rocket has cleared one of the major technological hurdles to fulfill the congressional mandate to end U.S. dependence on Russian engine technology for military launches. “Due to the hot, oxygen-rich environment inside a staged combustion engine like the AR1, burn resistant materials are necessary to ensure safe operation of the engine under all conditions,” said Julie Van Kleeck, vice president of Advanced Space and Launch Programs and Strategy. “Mondaloy 200™ alloy is the perfect material to use in the AR1, particularly when combined with 3-D printing, because it eliminates the need for exotic metal coatings currently used in the Russian-made RD-180 engine that the AR1 is designed to replace.” The AR1 engine development is using the same rigorous methodology the company has used for its previous successful engine development programs, such as the RS-68, J-2X, RL10, and RS-25. Prior to full engine testing, the company is testing critical components and systems to validate the flight designs, ensuring that they are each robust prior to completing the flight engine design. Hundreds of component and subsystem tests along with manufacturing demonstrations have already occurred on the AR1 engine in advance of full engine testing. This approach minimizes changes once engine-level testing begins. The engine design team has now successfully completed a series of 22 component Critical Design Reviews leading up to an engine system Critical Design Review to support engine qualification and certification in 2019. Aerojet Rocketdyne is an innovative company delivering solutions that create value for its customers in the aerospace and defense markets. The company is a world-recognized aerospace and defense leader that provides propulsion and energetics to the space, missile defense and strategic systems, tactical systems and armaments areas, in support of domestic and international markets. Additional information about Aerojet Rocketdyne can be obtained by visiting our websites at www.Rocket.com and www.AerojetRocketdyne.com.


News Article | May 4, 2017
Site: spaceref.biz

Aerojet Rocketdyne recently conducted hot-fire tests to validate the design of the preburner for the AR1 rocket engine, which represents the nation's lowest-risk, lowest-cost-to-the-taxpayer and fastest path to replacing the Russian-built RD-180 engine currently used to launch most U.S. national security payloads into space. "This important milestone keeps AR1 squarely on track for flight readiness in 2019," said Aerojet Rocketdyne CEO and President Eileen Drake. "Our proven design process and demonstrated manufacturing approaches are key contributors to Aerojet Rocketdyne's unmatched record of mission success. When replacing the Russian-made engines on current launch vehicles, mission success has to be the country's number one priority." The preburner, a critical component that drives the engine's turbomachinery, was built using state-of-the-art techniques, including 3-D printing which features Aerojet Rocketdyne's proprietary Mondaloy™ high-strength, burn resistant nickel-based super alloy. With the design now confirmed, Aerojet Rocket has cleared one of the major technological hurdles to fulfill the congressional mandate to end U.S. dependence on Russian engine technology for military launches. "Due to the hot, oxygen-rich environment inside a staged combustion engine like the AR1, burn resistant materials are necessary to ensure safe operation of the engine under all conditions," said Julie Van Kleeck, vice president of Advanced Space and Launch Programs and Strategy. "Mondaloy 200™ alloy is the perfect material to use in the AR1, particularly when combined with 3-D printing, because it eliminates the need for exotic metal coatings currently used in the Russian-made RD-180 engine that the AR1 is designed to replace." The AR1 engine development is using the same rigorous methodology the company has used for its previous successful engine development programs, such as the RS-68, J-2X, RL10, and RS-25. Prior to full engine testing, the company is testing critical components and systems to validate the flight designs, ensuring that they are each robust prior to completing the flight engine design. Hundreds of component and subsystem tests along with manufacturing demonstrations have already occurred on the AR1 engine in advance of full engine testing. This approach minimizes changes once engine-level testing begins. The engine design team has now successfully completed a series of 22 component Critical Design Reviews leading up to an engine system Critical Design Review to support engine qualification and certification in 2019. Aerojet Rocketdyne is an innovative company delivering solutions that create value for its customers in the aerospace and defense markets. The company is a world-recognized aerospace and defense leader that provides propulsion and energetics to the space, missile defense and strategic systems, tactical systems and armaments areas, in support of domestic and international markets. Additional information about Aerojet Rocketdyne can be obtained by visiting our websites at www.Rocket.com and www.AerojetRocketdyne.com. Please follow SpaceRef on Twitter and Like us on Facebook.


News Article | February 20, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

This report studies Nano Satellite in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman Planet Labs Surrey Satellite Technologies Spire Global Dauria Aerospace Tyvak CubeSat NANOSATELLITE COMPANIES AEC-Able Engineering AeroAstro Aeroflex Aerojet Airbus Defence and Space Aitech Alenia Spazio APCO Technologies Ardé ATK Austrian Aerospace Boeing Space Systems CAEN Aerospace Raytheon PCI Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Communications Satellite Positioning Satellite Others Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in each application, can be divided into Government Military Others Global Nano Satellite Market Research Report 2017 1 Nano Satellite Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Nano Satellite 1.2 Nano Satellite Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Nano Satellite by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Communications Satellite 1.2.3 Positioning Satellite 1.2.4 Others 1.3 Nano Satellite Segment by Application 1.3.1 Nano Satellite Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Government 1.3.3 Military 1.3.4 Others 1.4 Nano Satellite Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Nano Satellite (2012-2022) 2 Global Nano Satellite Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Nano Satellite Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.2 Global Nano Satellite Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.3 Global Nano Satellite Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.4 Manufacturers Nano Satellite Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Nano Satellite Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Nano Satellite Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Nano Satellite Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers …………. 7 Global Nano Satellite Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Lockheed Martin 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.1.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.1.3 Lockheed Martin Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Northrop Grumman 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.2.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.2.3 Northrop Grumman Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Planet Labs 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.3.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.3.3 Planet Labs Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Surrey Satellite Technologies 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.4.2.2 Positioning Satellite ..…..Continued Any Query?, Ask Here @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/975255-global-nano-satellite-market-research-report-2017 For more information, please visit http://www.wiseguyreports.com


This report studies Nano Satellite in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in each application, can be divided into Global Nano Satellite Market Research Report 2017 1 Nano Satellite Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Nano Satellite 1.2 Nano Satellite Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Nano Satellite by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Communications Satellite 1.2.3 Positioning Satellite 1.2.4 Others 1.3 Nano Satellite Segment by Application 1.3.1 Nano Satellite Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Government 1.3.3 Military 1.3.4 Others 1.4 Nano Satellite Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Nano Satellite (2012-2022) 2 Global Nano Satellite Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Nano Satellite Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.2 Global Nano Satellite Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.3 Global Nano Satellite Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.4 Manufacturers Nano Satellite Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Nano Satellite Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Nano Satellite Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Nano Satellite Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers 2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2012-2017) 3.1 Global Nano Satellite Production by Region (2012-2017) 3.2 Global Nano Satellite Production Market Share by Region (2012-2017) 3.3 Global Nano Satellite Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2012-2017) 3.4 Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.5 North America Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.6 Europe Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.7 China Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.8 Japan Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.9 Southeast Asia Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.10 India Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 5 Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type 5.1 Global Nano Satellite Production and Market Share by Type (2012-2017) 5.2 Global Nano Satellite Revenue and Market Share by Type (2012-2017) 5.3 Global Nano Satellite Price by Type (2012-2017) 5.4 Global Nano Satellite Production Growth by Type (2012-2017) 6 Global Nano Satellite Market Analysis by Application 6.1 Global Nano Satellite Consumption and Market Share by Application (2012-2017) 6.2 Global Nano Satellite Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2012-2017) 6.3 Market Drivers and Opportunities 6.3.1 Potential Applications 6.3.2 Emerging Markets/Countries 7 Global Nano Satellite Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Lockheed Martin 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.1.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.1.3 Lockheed Martin Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Northrop Grumman 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.2.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.2.3 Northrop Grumman Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Planet Labs 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.3.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.3.3 Planet Labs Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Surrey Satellite Technologies 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.4.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.4.3 Surrey Satellite Technologies Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Spire Global 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.5.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.5.3 Spire Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Dauria Aerospace 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.6.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.6.3 Dauria Aerospace Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Tyvak 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.7.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.7.3 Tyvak Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 CubeSat 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.8.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.8.3 CubeSat Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 NANOSATELLITE COMPANIES 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.9.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.9.3 NANOSATELLITE COMPANIES Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 AEC-Able Engineering 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.10.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.10.3 AEC-Able Engineering Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 AeroAstro 7.12 Aeroflex 7.13 Aerojet 7.14 Airbus Defence and Space 7.15 Aitech 7.16 Alenia Spazio 7.17 APCO Technologies 7.18 Ardé 7.19 ATK 7.20 Austrian Aerospace 7.21 Boeing Space Systems 7.22 CAEN Aerospace 7.23 Raytheon 7.24 PCI For more information, please visit http://www.wiseguyreports.com


News Article | January 6, 2016
Site: news.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc on Tuesday said it has won a $6 million contract from the U.S. Air Force to define the standards that will be used to qualify components made using 3-D printing for use in liquid-fueled rocket engine applications. The award is part of a larger drive by the U.S. military to end its reliance on Russian-built RD-180 rocket engines now used on the Atlas 5 rocket built by United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co. The Air Force plans to award additional, larger contracts for U.S.-developed propulsion systems later this year. Aerojet said it would draw upon its extensive experience with 3-D printing, or additive manufacturing, to draw up the standards that would be used to qualify 3-D printed rocket engine components for flight. Aerojet is developing its AR1 engine as an alternative to the RD-180 engine. New rocket engine designs like the AR1 are increasingly using 3-D printing technology because it reduces the amount of time and money required for the engines. The use of additive manufacturing technology reduces the cost to produce components, shortens build times and provides flexibility to engineers to design components that were once impossible to build using traditional manufacturing techniques. The contract calls for Aerojet to define the rigorous engineering and inspection processes to be followed when producing and testing 3-D printed components to ensure they meet the stringent requirements of aerospace systems. In 2014, Aerojet successfully tested an engine made entirely with additive manufacturing that had a thrust of 5,000 pounds. A year later, it used additive manufacturing to replicate the injector of the gas generator used on the Apollo-era F-1 rocket engine to demonstrate that a proven design can be built at a competitive cost without sacrificing performance.


This report studies sales (consumption) of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in Europe market, especially in Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Benelux and Spain, focuses on top players in these countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these Countries, covering Market Segment by Countries, this report splits Europe into several key Countries, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in these countries, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like Split by product type, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Type I Type II Type III Split by application, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in each application, can be divided into Application 1 Application 2 Application 3 View Full Report With Complete TOC, List Of Figure and Table: http://globalqyresearch.com/europe-terminal-high-altitude-area-defense-thaad-market-report-2016 Europe Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Market Report 2016 1 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) 1.2 Classification of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) 1.2.1 Type I 1.2.2 Type II 1.2.3 Type III 1.3 Application of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) 1.3.1 Application 1 1.3.2 Application 2 1.3.3 Application 3 1.4 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Market by Countries 1.4.1 Germany Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.2 France Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.3 UK Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.4 Russia Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.5 Italy Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.6 Spain Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.4.7 Benelux Status and Prospect (2011-2021) 1.5 Europe Market Size (Value and Volume) of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) (2011-2021) 1.5.1 Europe Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 1.5.2 Europe Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021) 10 Europe Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Manufacturers Analysis 10.1 Lockheed Martin Space Systems 10.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 10.1.2 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Product Type, Application and Specification 10.1.2.1 Type I 10.1.2.2 Type II 10.1.3 Lockheed Martin Space Systems Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 10.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 10.2 Caterpillar Defense 10.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 10.2.2 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Product Type, Application and Specification 10.2.2.1 Type I 10.2.2.2 Type II 10.2.3 Caterpillar Defense Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 10.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 10.3 Aerojet 10.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 10.3.2 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Product Type, Application and Specification 10.3.2.1 Type I 10.3.2.2 Type II 10.3.3 Aerojet Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 10.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 10.4 Raytheon 10.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 10.4.2 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Product Type, Application and Specification 10.4.2.1 Type I 10.4.2.2 Type II 10.4.3 Raytheon Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 10.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 10.5 Honeywell 10.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors 10.5.2 Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Product Type, Application and Specification 10.5.2.1 Type I 10.5.2.2 Type II 10.5.3 Honeywell Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016) 10.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview Global QYResearch is the one spot destination for all your research needs. Global QYResearch holds the repository of quality research reports from numerous publishers across the globe. Our inventory of research reports caters to various industry verticals including Healthcare, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Technology and Media, Chemicals, Materials, Energy, Heavy Industry, etc. With the complete information about the publishers and the industries they cater to for developing market research reports, we help our clients in making purchase decision by understanding their requirements and suggesting best possible collection matching their needs.

Loading Aerojet collaborators
Loading Aerojet collaborators