AEC

Chiba, Japan
Chiba, Japan
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

News Article | July 17, 2017
Site: www.prweb.com

Introduction: This Company has grown to be one of the leading providers of waste management services. It services large and small retail properties, shopping malls, multifamily properties, prison complexes and construction sites. The firm audits, recommends and implements cost savings in their waste management processes and procedures. Based on their size and their ability to command competitive pricing, the business engages and manages various third party service providers through long term contracts. Situation: Through their exclusive use of subcontractors and their unique invoicing procedures, this company was essentially locked out of the traditional factoring and ABL market. They needed a flexible solution and a firm willing to understand their business and their growth prospects. With the need to finance their growing business they turned to AEC. Solution: Recommended by their investment banker, AEC provided the Company with an expandable $575,000 Factoring and Cash-Flow Advance Facility. Realizing that a factoring facility was simply not enough, AEC provided and additional fully funded term advance against their present and future cash flow. This unique financing structure gave the Company the working capital it needed to onboard a number of new large clients and helped maintain their dominance in their highly competitive market. AEC was able to efficiently close and fund the transaction in a matter of weeks which has allowed the company to continue its growth initiative while it continued to diversify their client base. “AEC understands the void that exists in the traditional ABL and factoring market and aims to fulfill it by providing that crucial incremental working capital the small and mid-sized business community need – and doing it quickly,” said Steven Feldman, Managing Director of AEC. “We were told that we really made a difference with this relatively small project and helped a small company grow,” said Jack Doueck, Principal of AEC. About AEC: AEC is a commercial finance company which provides working capital financing ranging from $500,000 to $10 million to small and middle market manufacturers, distributors, and service companies nationwide. Based in New York, AEC is committed to helping businesses increase their capacity for business transactions. AEC’s programs provide companies with capital in a fraction of the time it would take to process a loan through the bank and in many cases, provide significantly higher proceeds than the traditional factoring companies and asset based lenders.


News Article | February 20, 2017
Site: marketersmedia.com

This report studies Nano Satellite in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Lockheed Martin Northrop Grumman Planet Labs Surrey Satellite Technologies Spire Global Dauria Aerospace Tyvak CubeSat NANOSATELLITE COMPANIES AEC-Able Engineering AeroAstro Aeroflex Aerojet Airbus Defence and Space Aitech Alenia Spazio APCO Technologies Ardé ATK Austrian Aerospace Boeing Space Systems CAEN Aerospace Raytheon PCI Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like North America Europe China Japan Southeast Asia India Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Communications Satellite Positioning Satellite Others Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in each application, can be divided into Government Military Others Global Nano Satellite Market Research Report 2017 1 Nano Satellite Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Nano Satellite 1.2 Nano Satellite Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Nano Satellite by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Communications Satellite 1.2.3 Positioning Satellite 1.2.4 Others 1.3 Nano Satellite Segment by Application 1.3.1 Nano Satellite Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Government 1.3.3 Military 1.3.4 Others 1.4 Nano Satellite Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Nano Satellite (2012-2022) 2 Global Nano Satellite Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Nano Satellite Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.2 Global Nano Satellite Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.3 Global Nano Satellite Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.4 Manufacturers Nano Satellite Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Nano Satellite Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Nano Satellite Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Nano Satellite Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers …………. 7 Global Nano Satellite Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Lockheed Martin 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.1.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.1.3 Lockheed Martin Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Northrop Grumman 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.2.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.2.3 Northrop Grumman Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Planet Labs 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.3.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.3.3 Planet Labs Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Surrey Satellite Technologies 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.4.2.2 Positioning Satellite ..…..Continued Any Query?, Ask Here @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/975255-global-nano-satellite-market-research-report-2017 For more information, please visit http://www.wiseguyreports.com


This report studies Nano Satellite in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with capacity, production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Nano Satellite in each application, can be divided into Global Nano Satellite Market Research Report 2017 1 Nano Satellite Market Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Nano Satellite 1.2 Nano Satellite Segment by Type 1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Nano Satellite by Type in 2015 1.2.2 Communications Satellite 1.2.3 Positioning Satellite 1.2.4 Others 1.3 Nano Satellite Segment by Application 1.3.1 Nano Satellite Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015 1.3.2 Government 1.3.3 Military 1.3.4 Others 1.4 Nano Satellite Market by Region 1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Nano Satellite (2012-2022) 2 Global Nano Satellite Market Competition by Manufacturers 2.1 Global Nano Satellite Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.2 Global Nano Satellite Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.3 Global Nano Satellite Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016) 2.4 Manufacturers Nano Satellite Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type 2.5 Nano Satellite Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.5.1 Nano Satellite Market Concentration Rate 2.5.2 Nano Satellite Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers 2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 3 Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2012-2017) 3.1 Global Nano Satellite Production by Region (2012-2017) 3.2 Global Nano Satellite Production Market Share by Region (2012-2017) 3.3 Global Nano Satellite Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2012-2017) 3.4 Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.5 North America Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.6 Europe Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.7 China Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.8 Japan Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.9 Southeast Asia Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 3.10 India Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017) 5 Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type 5.1 Global Nano Satellite Production and Market Share by Type (2012-2017) 5.2 Global Nano Satellite Revenue and Market Share by Type (2012-2017) 5.3 Global Nano Satellite Price by Type (2012-2017) 5.4 Global Nano Satellite Production Growth by Type (2012-2017) 6 Global Nano Satellite Market Analysis by Application 6.1 Global Nano Satellite Consumption and Market Share by Application (2012-2017) 6.2 Global Nano Satellite Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2012-2017) 6.3 Market Drivers and Opportunities 6.3.1 Potential Applications 6.3.2 Emerging Markets/Countries 7 Global Nano Satellite Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis 7.1 Lockheed Martin 7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.1.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.1.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.1.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.1.3 Lockheed Martin Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.2 Northrop Grumman 7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.2.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.2.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.2.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.2.3 Northrop Grumman Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.3 Planet Labs 7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.3.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.3.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.3.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.3.3 Planet Labs Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.4 Surrey Satellite Technologies 7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.4.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.4.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.4.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.4.3 Surrey Satellite Technologies Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.5 Spire Global 7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.5.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.5.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.5.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.5.3 Spire Global Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.6 Dauria Aerospace 7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.6.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.6.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.6.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.6.3 Dauria Aerospace Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.7 Tyvak 7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.7.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.7.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.7.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.7.3 Tyvak Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.8 CubeSat 7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.8.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.8.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.8.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.8.3 CubeSat Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.9 NANOSATELLITE COMPANIES 7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.9.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.9.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.9.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.9.3 NANOSATELLITE COMPANIES Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.10 AEC-Able Engineering 7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors 7.10.2 Nano Satellite Product Type, Application and Specification 7.10.2.1 Communications Satellite 7.10.2.2 Positioning Satellite 7.10.3 AEC-Able Engineering Nano Satellite Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016) 7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview 7.11 AeroAstro 7.12 Aeroflex 7.13 Aerojet 7.14 Airbus Defence and Space 7.15 Aitech 7.16 Alenia Spazio 7.17 APCO Technologies 7.18 Ardé 7.19 ATK 7.20 Austrian Aerospace 7.21 Boeing Space Systems 7.22 CAEN Aerospace 7.23 Raytheon 7.24 PCI For more information, please visit http://www.wiseguyreports.com


News Article | February 15, 2017
Site: www.prweb.com

Vector Solutions, the leader in eLearning and performance support solutions for the architecture, engineering, construction (AEC), industrial, public safety and IT infrastructure/security segments, is pleased to announce the promotion of Nancy D. Allen to Senior Vice President of Sales for RedVector. Allen will lead the Enterprise Sales teams for RedVector’s AEC and industrial segments, and for Vector Solutions’ newest brand, LearnSmart, which supports project management, IT and network security professionals. Allen’s leadership skills, detailed sales process and motivation helped lead her division to an impressive 64% year-over-year growth, making it the top division in the company in 2016. “Nancy is a high energy, customer-first sales leader with a tenacity that is second to none,” said Dave Brown, Vector Solutions Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing. “Her commitment to excellence will continue to positively impact the RedVector team and our clients. We congratulate her on her promotion and we are looking forward to future success under her direction.” Allen came to RedVector in 2015 after a long career with Konica Minolta, where she was the National Vice President of Vertical Markets. Nancy has a BA in business from Ole Miss, an MBA from the University of South Florida and is Lean Six Sigma certified from Villanova University. She lives in Tampa Bay with her husband Jason and has 6 children. She also serves many local charitable organizations and is a member of the Northeast Exchange club and a board member for the Tampa Bay Council of the Navy League. About Vector Solutions Vector Solutions sets the standard for excellence in delivering online continuing education, training and performance support solutions to the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industries, as well as industrial, public safety and IT fields. Through its brands RedVector, TargetSolutions and LearnSmart, Vector Solutions offers individual courses as well as and large-scale corporate training solutions via a state-of-the-art Learning Management System. With an online library exceeding 5,000 courses authored by more than 200 subject matter experts, Vector Solutions serves professionals and firms across the globe. The recipient of numerous community honors and industry awards, Vector Solutions was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Tampa, Florida. For more information, call 1-866-546-1212 or visit http://www.Vector-Solutions.com.


Qualified to AEC-Q200, the new Automotive Grade Accu-P Series SMD capacitors deliver the industry's tightest capacitive tolerances, in addition to exceptionally repeatable performance, extremely high stability, & remarkably low ESR & high Q at high frequencies FOUNTAIN INN, SC--(Marketwired - February 09, 2017) - AVX Corporation ( : AVX), a leading manufacturer and supplier of passive components and interconnect solutions, has released a new series of SMD thin film chip capacitors especially designed to meet demanding performance specifications in automotive signal and power applications. Qualified to AEC-Q200, AVX's new Automotive Grade Accu-P® Series capacitors deliver the tightest tolerances of any capacitor available on today's market (down to ±0.01pF), in addition to exceptionally repeatable performance, remarkably low ESR and high Q at high frequencies (including VHF, UHF, and RF bands), and extremely high stability with respect to temperature, time, frequency, and voltage variation when compared to ceramic capacitor technologies. Based on well-established thin film technology and materials, the new Automotive Grade Accu-P Series capacitors are also subjected to a litany of test and quality control procedures in accordance with ISO 9001, CECC, IECQ, and USA MIL -- including on-line process control procedures, accelerated life, dampness, and heat testing, and final quality inspections for capacitance, proof voltage, IR and breakdown voltage distribution, temperature coefficient, solderability, and dimensional, mechanical, and temperature stability -- which makes them ideal for use in automotive signal and power applications that require extremely high accuracy, such as: in-vehicle and vehicle-to-vehicle communications systems, vehicle location and alarm systems, GPS, in-cabin wireless LANs, and mobile communications including navigation, traffic information, and connected security systems. "Designed to exhibit ideal performance characteristics in high frequency signal and power applications, Accu-P Series capacitors virtually eliminate the variances in dielectric quality, electrode conductivity, and physical size that are inherent to ceramic capacitor technologies," said Larry Eisenberger, principal technical marketing engineer, AVX. "Named for the extreme accuracy they deliver in even demanding applications, Automotive Grade Accu-P Series SMD thin film chip capacitors feature high-purity electrodes for very low and repeatable ESR; high-purity, low-K dielectric for a high breakdown field, high IR, and low losses to frequencies above 40GHz; and very tight dimensional control for uniform unit-to-unit inductance." Automotive Grade Accu-P Series capacitors are currently available in three standard case sizes (0402, 0603, and 0805), six rated voltages (10V, 16V, 25V, 50V, 100V, and 200V), and two dielectric temperature coefficients (0±30ppm/°C and 0±60ppm/°C) with capacitance values spanning 0.05pF to 68pF, and capacitive tolerances from ±0.01pF to ±5%. Rated for use in operating temperatures spanning -55°C to +125°C, the ruggedly constructed series also offers four termination compositions, including RoHS compliant and lead-free compatible options, and nickel/solder-coated terminations that provide excellent solderability and leach resistance. Designed for soldering onto flexible or alumina circuit boards, Automotive Grade Accu-P Series capacitors can withstand the time and temperature profiles used in both wave and reflow soldering methods. Shipped on 7" or 13" reels, the components should be handled with plastic-tipped tweezers, vacuum pick-ups, or other pick-and-place machinery. Lead-time for the series is currently 10 weeks. For more information about AVX's new Automotive Grade Accu-P Series SMD thin film chip capacitors for automotive signal and power applications, please visit http://www.avx.com/products/rfmicrowave/capacitors/automotive-grade-accu-p/ to access the product datasheet, catalog, part number information, and design tools. For all other inquiries, please visit www.avx.com, call 864-967-2150, or write to One AVX Boulevard, Fountain Inn, S.C. 29644. AVX Corporation is a leading international manufacturer and supplier of electronic passive components and interconnect solutions with 20 manufacturing and warehouse facilities in 11 countries around the world. AVX offers a broad range of devices including capacitors, resistors, filters, timing and circuit protection devices, and connectors. The company is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange ( : AVX). A member of the Kyocera Group since 1990, AVX is also the only company authorized to supply Kyocera's electronic devices to the Americas and Europe. Established in 1959 and based in Kyoto, Japan, Kyocera Corporation is a leading international supplier of connectors, capacitors, ceramic resonators, surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters and duplexers, and crystal oscillators and timing devices.


News Article | February 15, 2017
Site: cerncourier.com

On 21 November, CERN signed an agreement with Sekhar Basu, chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and secretary of the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) of the government of India, to admit India as an associate Member State. India has been a partner of CERN for more than 50 years, during which it has made substantial contributions to the construction of the LHC and to the ALICE and CMS experiments, as well as Tier-2 centres for the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid. A co-operation agreement was signed in 1991, but India’s relationship with CERN goes back much further, with Indian institutes having provided components for the LEP collider and one of its four detectors, L3, in addition to the WA93 and WA89 detectors. The success of the DAE–CERN partnership regarding the LHC has also led to co-operation on novel accelerator technologies through DAE’s participation in CERN’s Linac4, SPL and CTF3 projects. India also participates in the COMPASS, ISOLDE and nTOF experiments at CERN. In recognition of these substantial contributions, India was granted observer status at CERN Council in 2002. When it enters into force, associate membership will allow India to take part in CERN Council meetings and its committees, and will make Indian scientists eligible for staff appointments. “Becoming associate member of CERN will enhance participation of young scientists and engineers in various CERN projects and bring back knowledge for deployment in the domestic programmes,” says Basu. “It will also provide opportunities to Indian industries to participate directly in CERN projects.”


News Article | February 20, 2017
Site: www.theguardian.com

Malcolm Turnbull has hit back at suggestions that his house’s large personal rooftop solar and battery system sends a message contrary to the government’s endorsement of “clean coal”. He rejected the idea that he had ever been critical of the renewables sector and dismissed his treasurer’s brandishing of a lump of coal in question time as “theatrics”. “It’s not a question of beliefs, saying ‘Do you believe in renewables?’,” the prime minister said. “It’s like saying ‘Do you believe in tables?’ Renewables are there, they are doing well, they have got certain characteristics and you have to design your grid to take account of that.” As his energy and environment minister, Josh Frydenberg, raised the prospect of changing the mandate of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to accommodate coal, the prime minister said he had always been objective about energy. Asked whether his solar panels were enough to provide power to three average homes, Turnbull agreed that his personal 14.5kW system on the roof of his Point Piper home, with battery storage, was a “large array”. Turnbull went on to explain his position on climate change and his government’s energy policy. “I believe that climate change is a threat that we have to deal with,” Turnbull told ABC Perth. “I believe that we have to reduce our emissions. I believe that we need to ensure that we use all technologies to generate energy.” A week ago, when blackouts were occurring in South Australia and were threatening other states, Renew Economy reported that Turnbull could rest easy, knowing his solar storage system would cover any energy usage in his own house. “I have never disparaged the renewables sector,” he said on Monday. “This is where, with great respect, journalists sometimes hear what they want to hear rather than what people are saying. “When I spoke at the press club, I made the point of the importance of renewables, I made the point of how the cost of renewables is coming down. The cost per watt of solar panels is a fraction of what it was 10 years ago. “However, the issue with variable renewables – by which I mean principally solar and wind – is that they don’t generate electricity all the time.” Turnbull said he was the first political leader in Australia to talk about the importance of storage, including pumped hydro and batteries. Last week the CEFC granted a $54m loan to a large-scale solar development which it says has the potential for pumped hydro storage. He also said more gas needed to become available as a back-up. But his finance minister, Mathias Cormann, who has dual responsibility for appointing members of the CEFC board, rejected outright the opinion of the CEFC chief executive, Oliver Yates, that coal investments were very risky for the taxpayer. Yates told a Senate committee that the CEFC would not likely invest in coal technology. Yates is due to step down within weeks, a position to be filled by Cormann and Frydenberg. “We don’t agree with [Yates], obviously,” Cormann told the ABC. “I mean what is risky right now, and the experience in South Australia, of course, has shown that, is the reckless and ideological pursuit of state-based 50% renewable energy targets, which have put the stability of our energy system at risk.” Cormann blamed previous Labor policy for the lack of investment appetite for coal-fired power. “The reason why there’s been, you know, obviously no appetite for private-sector investment is because of the policy settings that have been progressively put in place by Labor and Green governments,” Cormann said. “If you look at other parts around the world, high-energy, high energy-efficient and low-emission technologies when it comes to coal have been deployed, are being deployed, are being considered and, you know, we think that that needs to be considered in Australia too.” The Australian Energy Council, representing 21 major electricity and natural gas businesses, has said there is no appetite for new coal-fired power in Australia. “While lower-emissions coal-fired power stations could be considered theoretically, in practice there is no current investment appetite to develop new coal-fired power in Australia,” the AEC chief executive, Matthew Warren, has stated. “The industry’s investment focus has shifted to a combination of … lower-emissions gas generation, renewables and enabling technologies like storage.”


News Article | February 27, 2017
Site: www.prweb.com

The threat of nuclear warfare has long plagued this world. In July of 1962, Dot Clayton went to work for a company involved in the underground testing of nuclear weapons. Years later, when her co-workers began dying, Dot started searching for answers. In “Dying for Answers: Expendable Workers of the Cold War Nuclear Testing,” Clayton exposes the critical decisions made by agencies involved in the nuclear testing during the Cold War. “This is a true story about the Nevada Test Site (NTS), government cover-ups, denials and disinformation by the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), later known as the Department of Energy,” Clayton said. “The information contained regards radiation exposure to employees, obtained from previously classified employment records.” Clayton’s husband, Glenn, an NTS employee, died in 1999. After months of refusal by the Department of Energy to release Glenn’s employment records, Clayton was finally able to obtain them, through the Freedom of Information Act, exactly a year after his death. The previously classified government records detail Glenn’s excessive, deadly exposure to radiation through his employment at NTS and his involvement in the underground testing of nuclear bombs. “These people were dedicated to their country and to their employer,” Clayton said. “Both of whom failed to protect them.” “Dying for Answers” By Dot Clayton ISBN: 978-1-4897-1052-9 Available at the LifeRich Publishing and Amazon About the author In the early years of the nuclear bomb testing, Dot Clayton went to work at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), located sixty-nine miles north of Las Vegas. She was employed by an engineering company responsible for the survey work in preparation for nuclear bomb tests. She witnessed, first-hand, the devastation of those tests, as workers began dying from all types of cancer.


News Article | February 20, 2017
Site: www.prnewswire.com

ATLANTA, Feb. 20, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Applied Software®, a leading systems integrator in the AEC, construction and manufacturing industries, announced today its partnership with Xinaps, developer of a suite of plug-ins that ensures data quality validation and compliance with local...


News Article | February 23, 2017
Site: www.prweb.com

Car Wars is pleased to announce, along with PCG Companies, the Automotive Engagement Conference (AEC) Tour will be hosting seven events in seven major cities across the nation. The tour will kickoff in Atlanta, Georgia on March 23, 2017 at the Marriott Century City Hotel. The AEC, national tour is geared toward teaching automotive dealers how to leverage Google Analytics, measure online consumer engagement and upgrade attribution models to sell more cars in a digital age. Car Wars is partnering with AEC to educate dealers on how to get smart with their marketing spend, maximize customer opportunities and improve phone processes. Car Wars’ call tracking and marketing analytics software actively helps more than 9,000 dealerships to Own the Phone. Cassie Broemmer, Vice President of Business Development, will be representing Car Wars by leading workshops at each event. Broemmer is regarded as one of the foremost experts in the fields of automotive marketing and customer communication. She is a frequent speaker at industry events and is constantly sought after as a progressive thought leader. Broemmer’s sessions will enlighten dealers on how to utilize their most important conversion channel: the phone. Attendees will walk away knowing how to transform their team into phone experts, re-evaluate their marketing investments and, immediately, start driving more booked appointments at their dealerships. "I am ready to get this tour on the road. Dealerships need to Own the Phone. I love getting to show dealers how they can get smart with their marketing spend, maximize customer opportunities and improve phone processes,” said Broemmer. The AEC Tour is structured to empower dealers to hold all marketing agencies, website providers, third-party website tools and OEM approved vendors to a single set of metrics that are easily inspected and actionable. Following the tour’s opening event in Atlanta, the AEC will make stops in Detroit, Tysons Corner, Dallas, Teaneck, New Jersey, Los Angeles and Chicago through June (with additional date requests being considered). Tickets to attend cost $50 per person. Attendees will leave with over $300 worth of educational resources, featuring two new books from PCG Companies along with access to online training courses in Google Analytics and Online Marketing for Managers. To learn more and register to the event closest to you, please visit https://goo.gl/Pb4uwh. Car Wars, based in Dallas, Texas, is the premier call tracking provider for more than 9,000 automotive dealerships. Their team of 90,000 human reviewers track and record every inbound and outbound call at a dealership. The platform provides insight into how every call is handled, alerts dealers when a missed opportunity needs attention and, ultimately, helps stores improve phone performance. Dealers turn to Car Wars when they’re overwhelmed by the phone. Car Wars fosters a thriving phone culture centered around accountability and converts more phone calls into booked appointments. PCG Companies is composed of an award-winning digital marketing agency, consulting firm, and online training platform located in Monmouth County, NJ. PCG’s roots began in digital marketing for the automotive industry, and their mission, Advocate-Educate-Elevate, embodies their core ideals; to advocate for transparency, educate the public on the ever-changing digital landscape, and elevate their clients’ to success. PCG has also expanded to automotive product research, as well as data reporting for automotive dealers with their tool, VistaDash. For more information, please visit http://www.pcgcompanies.com.

Loading AEC collaborators
Loading AEC collaborators