Academic Center for General Practice

Leuven, Belgium

Academic Center for General Practice

Leuven, Belgium
SEARCH FILTERS
Time filter
Source Type

Storms H.,Hasselt University | Claes N.,Hasselt University | Aertgeerts B.,Catholic University of Leuven | Aertgeerts B.,Academic Center for General Practice | Van Den Broucke S.,Catholic University of Louvain
BMC Public Health | Year: 2017

Background: Health literacy (HL) is defined as necessary competencies to make well-informed decisions. As patients’ decision making is a key element of patient-centered health care, insight in patients’ HL might help healthcare professionals to organize their care accordingly. This is particularly true for people in a vulnerable situation, potentially with limited HL, who are, for instance, at greater risk of having limited access to care [1, 2]. As HL correlates with education, instruments should allow inclusion of low literate people. To that end, the relatively new instrument, HLS-EU-Q47, was subjected to a comprehensibility test, its shorter version, HLS-EU-Q16, was not. Therefore, the goal of this study was to examine feasibility of HLS-EU-Q16 (in Dutch) for use in a population of people with low literacy. Methods: Purposive sampling of adults with low (yearly) income (< €16,965.47) and limited education (maximum high school), with Dutch language proficiency. Exclusion criteria were: psychiatric, neurodegenerative diseases or impairments. To determine suitability (length, comprehension and layout) participants were randomly distributed either HLS-EU-Q16 or a modified version and were interviewed directly afterwards by one researcher. To determine feasibility a qualitative approach was chosen: cognitive interviews were carried out using the verbal probing technique. Results: Thirteen participants completed HLS-EU-Q16 (n = 7) or the modified version (n = 6). Questions about ‘disease prevention’ or ‘appraisal’ of information are frequently reported to be incomprehensible. Difficulties are attributed to vocabulary, sentence structure and the decision process (abstraction, distinguishing ‘appraising’ from ‘applying’ information, indecisive on the appropriate response). Conclusions: HLS-EU-Q16 is a suitable instrument to determine HL in people with limited literacy. However, to facilitate the use and interpretation, some questions would benefit from minor adjustments: by simplifying wording or providing explanatory, contextual information. © 2017 The Author(s).


Peters S.,Academic Center for General Practice | Clarebout G.,Maastricht University | van Nuland M.,Academic Center for General Practice | Aertgeerts B.,Academic Center for General Practice | Roex A.,Academic Center for General Practice
Teaching and Learning in Medicine | Year: 2017

Phenomenon: Transfer of learning between classroom and workplace appears to be difficult. Various conceptions about learning in either the classroom or the workplace exist among stakeholders, yet little is known about their conceptions of the transfer of learning between both settings. This study explored stakeholders' conceptions about transfer of learning between classroom-based learning and workplace practice. Approach: Homogeneous focus groups with students, medical teachers, and workplace supervisors were conducted using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Findings: The 54 participants' conceptions mainly related to their beliefs about who was responsible for (a) preparing for transfer of learning, (b) being at the workplace and connecting back to classroom-based learning, and (c) reflecting on transfer of learning and continuing the process. A continuum was recognized between those who held medical teachers/workplace supervisors responsible and those who held students responsible. Insights: There appears to be a variety of conceptions about who is responsible for enabling the transfer process. These conceptions may influence learning and instructional activities. Hence, it may be necessary to make these beliefs explicit in order to better align stakeholders' conceptions. To this end, the conceptual framework created in this study may be a useful tool. © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC


Boshuizen H.C.,PO box 1 3720 BA | Boshuizen H.C.,Wageningen University | Poos M.J.J.C.,PO box 1 3720 BA | van den Akker M.,Maastricht University | And 6 more authors.
Population Health Metrics | Year: 2017

Background: Morbidity estimates between different GP registration networks show large, unexplained variations. This research explores the potential of modeling differences between networks in distinguishing new (incident) cases from existing (prevalent) cases in obtaining more reliable estimates. Methods: Data from five Dutch GP registration networks and data on four chronic diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], diabetes, heart failure, and osteoarthritis of the knee) were used. A joint model (DisMod model) was fitted using all information on morbidity (incidence and prevalence) and mortality in each network, including a factor for misclassification of prevalent cases as incident cases. Results: The observed estimates vary considerably between networks. Using disease modeling including a misclassification term improved the consistency between prevalence and incidence rates, but did not systematically decrease the variation between networks. Osteoarthritis of the knee showed large modeled misclassifications, especially in episode of care-based registries. Conclusion: Registries that code episodes of care rather than disease generally provide lower estimates of the prevalence of chronic diseases requiring low levels of health care such as osteoarthritis. For other diseases, modeling misclassification rates does not systematically decrease the variation between registration networks. Using disease modeling provides insight in the reliability of estimates. © 2017 The Author(s).


Van Mechelen W.,Academic Center for General Practice
Palliative medicine | Year: 2013

The lack of a clear definition of the palliative care patient hampers the comparison of results across different studies and impedes implementation of research findings in everyday practice. The aim of this article is to propose minimum characteristics that define a palliative care patient. The design involved a systematic review of medical literature searching randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in palliative care for clear descriptions of their palliative care patients. We systematically describe relevant characteristics of the study populations of 60 eligible RCTs. Data sources: The data sources used were MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PSYCHINFO, including all non-cancer RCTs (1 January 1995-4 March 2010) and an equivalent number of the most recent cancer RCTs (1 January 2003-4 March 2010). Half of the non-cancer studies were excluded because they did not relate to palliative care. We conclude that published RCTs have no clear definitions of their palliative care patients and illustrate the diversity of this patient, the lack of consensus concerning the attributes of illnesses needing palliation and the ambiguous use of the adjective 'palliative'. We propose elements of the patients' health status (e.g. a progressive, life-threatening disease with no possibility of obtaining remission or stabilisation, or modifying the course of the illness) and the care delivered to them (e.g. a holistic interdisciplinary approach that focuses on supporting the quality of the end of life) to be included in the definition of a palliative care patient. We also suggest considering the patients' readiness to accept palliative care and a vision of palliative care shared by the patient and all caregivers involved as potentially important elements in this definition.


Arnaud J.,French Institute of Health and Medical Research | Arnaud J.,Grenoble University Hospital Center | de Lorgeril M.,CNRS Complex Medical Engineering Laboratory | Akbaraly T.,Montpellier University | And 43 more authors.
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases | Year: 2012

Background and aims: The European 'IMMIDIET' study was designed to evaluate the effect of genetic and dietary habit interactions on cardiovascular disease risk factors in non-diabetic subjects. Copper, zinc and selenium are involved in redox balance and modifications of their homeostasis could be associated with metabolic syndrome. Because few studies have dealt with trace element status in metabolic syndrome with conflicting results, we aimed at investigating the relationships between plasma copper, zinc and selenium concentrations and metabolic syndrome in the IMMIDIET population. Methods and results: Male-female couples born and living in Abruzzo, Italy (n = 271); Limburg, Belgium (n = 267), southwest part of London, England (n = 263) and 205 Italian-Belgian mixed couples living in Belgium were enrolled. Data on medical history, hypertension and blood lipid profile, medication use, smoking and alcohol habits, physical activity and socioeconomic status were collected using a standardised questionnaire. Anthropometric, blood pressure, glucose, insulin, lipid profile and copper, zinc and selenium measurements were performed. Participants were classified in two groups according to the presence of metabolic syndrome (Yes/No).Comparison between these two groups, performed separately in men and women, indicated no association in men whereas, in women, metabolic syndrome was associated with higher plasma selenium concentrations (odds ratio (OR) = 1.55(1.28-1.89)); this association remained significant after adjustment for age, group, social status, physical activity, energy intake, alcohol consumption, smoking and hormonal status (OR = 1.33 (1.06-1.67)). Conclusion: Our results indicate gender differences in the association between plasma selenium concentration and metabolic syndrome without diabetes and may suggest a sub-clinical deleterious effect of high selenium status in women. © 2010 Elsevier B.V..


Howick J.,University of Oxford | Cals J.W.L.,Maastricht University | Jones C.,University of Oxford | Price C.P.,University of Oxford | And 14 more authors.
BMJ Open | Year: 2014

Objective: Despite the growing number of point-of-care (POC) tests available, little research has assessed primary care clinician need for such tests. We therefore aimed to determine which POC tests they actually use or would like to use (if not currently available in their practice). Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Primary care in Australia, Belgium (Flanders region only), the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. Participants: Primary care doctors (general practitioners, family physicians). Main measures: We asked respondents to (1) identify conditions for which a POC test could help inform diagnosis, (2) from a list of tests provided: evaluate which POC tests they currently use (and how frequently) and (3) determine which tests (from that same list) they would like to use in the future (and how frequently). Results: 2770 primary care clinicians across five countries responded. Respondents in all countries wanted POC tests to help them diagnose acute conditions (infections, acute cardiac disease, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), and some chronic conditions (diabetes, anaemia). Based on the list of POC tests provided, the most common tests currently used were: urine pregnancy, urine leucocytes or nitrite and blood glucose. The most commonly reported tests respondents expressed a wish to use in the future were: D-dimer, troponin and chlamydia. The UK and the USA reported a higher actual and desired use for POC tests than Australia, Belgium and the Netherlands. Our limited data suggest (but do not confirm) representativeness. Conclusions: Primary care clinicians in all five countries expressed a desire for POC tests to help them diagnose a range of acute and chronic conditions. Rates of current reported use and desired future use were generally high for a small selection of POC tests, but varied across countries. Future research is warranted to explore how specific POC tests might improve primary care.


De Hert M.,University Psychiatric Center Zorg Ku Leuven | Van Bos L.,University Psychiatric Center Zorg Ku Leuven | Sweers K.,University Psychiatric Center Zorg Ku Leuven | Wampers M.,University Psychiatric Center Zorg Ku Leuven | And 4 more authors.
PLoS ONE | Year: 2015

Introduction When psychiatric patients express a wish for euthanasia, this should first and foremost be interpreted as a cry for help. Due to their close day-to-day relationship, psychiatric nurses may play an important and central role in responding to such requests. However, little is known about nurses' attitudes towards euthanasia motivated by unbearable mental suffering. Objectives The aim of this study was to provide insight into the attitudes and actions taken by psychiatric nurses when confronted with a patient's euthanasia request based on unbearable mental suffering (UMS). Method A questionnaire was sent to 11 psychiatric hospitals in the Flemish part of Belgium. Results The overall response rate was 70% (N = 627). Psychiatric nurses were frequently confronted with a request for euthanasia, either directly (N = 329,53%) or through a colleague (N = 427, 69%). A majority (N = 536, 84%) did not object to euthanasia in a psychiatrically ill population with UMS. Confounding factors were the psychiatric diagnosis and the type of ward where the nurses were working. Most participants acknowledged a lack of knowledge and skills to adequately address the euthanasia request (N = 434,71%). Nearly unanimously (N = 618, 99%), study participants indicated that dealing with euthanasia requests and other end-of-life issues should be part of the formal training of nurses. Conclusion The results highlight the need for ethically sound and comprehensive provision of care. Psychiatric nurses play an important role in dealing with the complex issue of requests for euthanasia. There is also a need for education, training and clear guidelines on the level of health care organizations. © 2015 De Hert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


PubMed | University of Amsterdam, University of Washington, Academic Center for General Practice, University of Groningen and 6 more.
Type: Journal Article | Journal: BMJ open | Year: 2014

Despite the growing number of point-of-care (POC) tests available, little research has assessed primary care clinician need for such tests. We therefore aimed to determine which POC tests they actually use or would like to use (if not currently available in their practice).Cross-sectional survey.Primary care in Australia, Belgium (Flanders region only), the Netherlands, the UK and the USA.Primary care doctors (general practitioners, family physicians).We asked respondents to (1) identify conditions for which a POC test could help inform diagnosis, (2) from a list of tests provided: evaluate which POC tests they currently use (and how frequently) and (3) determine which tests (from that same list) they would like to use in the future (and how frequently).2770 primary care clinicians across five countries responded. Respondents in all countries wanted POC tests to help them diagnose acute conditions (infections, acute cardiac disease, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), and some chronic conditions (diabetes, anaemia). Based on the list of POC tests provided, the most common tests currently used were: urine pregnancy, urine leucocytes or nitrite and blood glucose. The most commonly reported tests respondents expressed a wish to use in the future were: D-dimer, troponin and chlamydia. The UK and the USA reported a higher actual and desired use for POC tests than Australia, Belgium and the Netherlands. Our limited data suggest (but do not confirm) representativeness.Primary care clinicians in all five countries expressed a desire for POC tests to help them diagnose a range of acute and chronic conditions. Rates of current reported use and desired future use were generally high for a small selection of POC tests, but varied across countries. Future research is warranted to explore how specific POC tests might improve primary care.


PubMed | Academic Center for General Practice
Type: Journal Article | Journal: Palliative medicine | Year: 2013

The lack of a clear definition of the palliative care patient hampers the comparison of results across different studies and impedes implementation of research findings in everyday practice.The aim of this article is to propose minimum characteristics that define a palliative care patient.The design involved a systematic review of medical literature searching randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in palliative care for clear descriptions of their palliative care patients. We systematically describe relevant characteristics of the study populations of 60 eligible RCTs.The data sources used were MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PSYCHINFO, including all non-cancer RCTs (1 January 1995-4 March 2010) and an equivalent number of the most recent cancer RCTs (1 January 2003-4 March 2010).Half of the non-cancer studies were excluded because they did not relate to palliative care. We conclude that published RCTs have no clear definitions of their palliative care patients and illustrate the diversity of this patient, the lack of consensus concerning the attributes of illnesses needing palliation and the ambiguous use of the adjective palliative.We propose elements of the patients health status (e.g. a progressive, life-threatening disease with no possibility of obtaining remission or stabilisation, or modifying the course of the illness) and the care delivered to them (e.g. a holistic interdisciplinary approach that focuses on supporting the quality of the end of life) to be included in the definition of a palliative care patient. We also suggest considering the patients readiness to accept palliative care and a vision of palliative care shared by the patient and all caregivers involved as potentially important elements in this definition.


Heselmans A.,Academic Center for General Practice | Van Krieken J.,AZ Sint Maarten General Hospital | Ramaekers D.,Center for Health Services and Nursing Research
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics | Year: 2015

What is known and objective Drug-related problems (DRPs) occur frequently in hospitalized patients. Patient discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a non-ICU ward is one of the most challenging and high-risk transitions of care due to the number of medications, and the complexity and acuity of the medical conditions that characterize this patient group. Pharmacists could play an important role in preventing DRPs. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact on the number and severity of drug-related problems by assigning a clinical pharmacist to the transfer process from ICU to wards. Methods The study was a randomized controlled multicentre trial conducted at the Hospital Network of Antwerp between December 2010 and January 2012. The clinical pharmacist performed a medical review in both the intervention and control group. Recommendations for drug therapy changes were immediately communicated in the intervention group but were kept blinded in the control group. The primary outcome was expressed as the number of implemented recommendations for drug therapy changes. Differences between groups were calculated using mixed effects binary logistic regression. Results Drug-related problems were found in the medical records of 360 of the 600 participants (60%). A total of 743 recommendations could be made, 375 in the intervention group and 368 in the control group. 54·1% of these problems were adjusted on time in the intervention group vs. 12·8% in the control group. Of 743 recommendations, 24·8% were judged by the expert group as major, 13·1% as moderate, 53.4% as minor and 8·9% as having no clinical impact. The odds of implementing recommendations of drug therapy changes in the intervention group were 10 times the odds of implementing recommendations of drug therapy changes in the control group (odds ratio = 10·1; 95%CI [6·3-16·1]; P < 0·001), even after accounting for differences in types of DRP between the groups (odds ratio = 15·6; 95%CI [9·4-25·9]; P < 0·001). What is new and conclusion The integration of a clinical pharmacist at the transfer point from ICU to ward led to a significant reduction in DRPs. The odds of implementing recommendations of drug therapy changes in the intervention group were significant higher than the odds of implementing recommendations of drug therapy changes in the control group. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Loading Academic Center for General Practice collaborators
Loading Academic Center for General Practice collaborators